Naval Warfare during the American Revolution
© HistoryMaps

Thematic Articles

Naval Warfare during the American Revolution

Play button

Naval Warfare during the American Revolution

nono umasy



The American Revolution, spanning from 1775 to 1783, was a monumental conflict in which the thirteen American colonies fought to gain independence from British rule. This war, fueled by a desire for self-governance and freedom from oppressive British policies, significantly altered the political landscape of the New World. The importance of naval warfare during this revolution cannot be overstated, as control of the seas played a crucial role in the conflict's outcome.


Naval warfare during the American Revolution was pivotal in disrupting British supply lines, which were essential for maintaining British troops and their operations in the colonies. The British, relying heavily on supplies transported across the Atlantic, faced significant challenges when American privateers and the Continental Navy attacked their supply ships. These naval engagements weakened British logistical support and stretched their resources thin, making it more difficult for British forces to sustain prolonged military campaigns on American soil.


In the 18th century, naval power was a critical element of national strength and colonial expansion. The British Royal Navy was the preeminent naval force in the world, boasting a large fleet of well-armed and expertly manned ships. The dominance of the Royal Navy allowed Britain to project its power globally, protect its trade routes, and maintain its vast colonial empire. Other major powers, such as France and Spain, also maintained significant naval capabilities, leading to a constant struggle for naval supremacy. This era was characterized by the development of powerful ships of the line, advancements in naval tactics, and the establishment of naval bases and dockyards to support fleets.


I. Naval Warfare Before the Revolution



Pre-Revolutionary Naval Tactics

Before the American Revolution, naval tactics were heavily influenced by the dominant European powers, particularly Britain, France, and Spain. Naval warfare in this era was characterized by the use of large, heavily armed ships of the line, arranged in linear formations to maximize broadside firepower. This tactic, known as the line of battle, allowed fleets to concentrate their firepower while minimizing exposure to enemy guns. Fleet actions were often decisive, with the aim of achieving naval supremacy through the destruction or capture of enemy vessels.


European naval strategies significantly shaped American naval tactics. British naval doctrine, which emphasized discipline, gunnery, and seamanship, served as a model for the fledgling American navy. The French, with their innovative ship designs and emphasis on speed and maneuverability, also influenced American naval thinking. These European influences were evident in the tactics employed by American privateers and naval forces, who adopted and adapted European methods to suit their needs.


The American colonies had limited naval experience before the Revolution, primarily through privateering and small-scale maritime conflicts. Colonial privateers, who were essentially legalized pirates, had some success during earlier conflicts like the War of Jenkins' Ear (1739-1748) and the Seven Years' War (1756-1763). These privateers attacked enemy merchant ships, disrupting trade and capturing valuable cargo. Although these engagements were on a smaller scale, they provided the colonies with a pool of experienced seafarers and a nascent understanding of naval warfare.


Case studies of pre-revolutionary naval battles highlight this limited experience. For example, during the Seven Years' War, colonial privateers played a role in harassing French shipping along the North American coast. These engagements demonstrated the potential of using small, fast ships to disrupt enemy supply lines, a tactic that would later be crucial during the American Revolution.


II. The Continental Navy


Formation and Early Challenges

The origins of the Continental Navy date back to October 1775, when the Continental Congress recognized the necessity of establishing a naval force to challenge British supremacy on the seas. The decision was driven by the need to disrupt British supply lines, protect American merchant shipping, and support military operations along the coast. Congress authorized the acquisition and outfitting of several ships, marking the birth of the Continental Navy.


The nascent Continental Navy faced numerous challenges from the outset. One of the most significant obstacles was the lack of ships. At the time, the colonies had few vessels capable of engaging the well-equipped and experienced British Navy. Additionally, there was a severe shortage of trained personnel. Unlike their British counterparts, the Americans had limited experience in naval warfare, and there were few sailors or officers with the requisite skills. Resources were also scarce; the fledgling navy had to compete with the Continental Army for funding, supplies, and support.


To address these challenges, the Continental Congress formed the first Naval Committee in November 1775. This committee, consisting of prominent members like John Adams and Silas Deane, was tasked with overseeing the creation and management of the navy. The committee's responsibilities included selecting and purchasing ships, recruiting and training personnel, and developing naval strategies. This organizational structure was crucial in coordinating the efforts to build a functional and effective navy.


Under the authorizations from Congress on October 13 and October 30, 1775, the Naval Committee purchased four ships: the Alfred, Columbus, Cabot, and Andrew Doria. These vessels were named in honor of significant historical figures: the founder of the English navy, the discoverer of America, the first English explorer of America, and the notable Genoese admiral, respectively. The Alfred, originally the Black Prince and owned by Philadelphia merchant John Nixon, was the first ship bought, marking it as the first vessel in the American navy, with a burden of 220 tons.


By late January 1776, the Committee expanded the navy by acquiring four additional smaller vessels: the sloops Providence and Hornet, and the schooners Wasp and Fly. The Providence had previously been the Katy of the Rhode Island navy, while the Hornet and Wasp were procured in Baltimore. These eight ships formed the initial core of the Continental Navy.


©HistoryMaps


Evolution of the Continental Navy

As the Revolutionary War progressed, the Continental Navy gradually expanded. The initial fleet of converted merchant ships was supplemented by newly constructed warships, including frigates like the USS Randolph and the USS Hancock. The navy also began capturing British vessels, further bolstering its numbers and capabilities. Training programs were developed to improve the skills of sailors and officers, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the navy.


The organizational structure of the Continental Navy evolved to meet the demands of a growing force. A more formal naval command system was established, with defined ranks and a clearer chain of command. This structure improved coordination and operational efficiency, allowing the navy to conduct more complex and coordinated actions.


Several key pieces of legislation and policies enacted by Congress significantly shaped the development of the Continental Navy. The Naval Act of 1775 authorized the construction of the first warships and provided guidelines for their operation. Subsequent acts focused on the regulation of naval affairs, including the establishment of prize courts to adjudicate the capture of enemy vessels and the distribution of prize money to sailors, which served as an incentive for recruitment and engagement in combat.


Innovation was necessary for the Continental Navy to compete with the British. American naval architects focused on designing ships that were fast, maneuverable, and capable of carrying heavy armaments. This emphasis on speed and firepower allowed American ships to engage in hit-and-run tactics, disrupting British supply lines and avoiding direct confrontations with larger fleets.


Early naval engagements provided valuable lessons that shaped American naval strategy. The Battle of Nassau in 1776, one of the first major actions of the Continental Navy, demonstrated the potential of surprise attacks and amphibious operations. The successes of American privateers in capturing British merchant ships underscored the effectiveness of commerce raiding as a strategic tool. These initial skirmishes reinforced the importance of agility, innovation, and audacity in the face of a superior adversary, principles that would guide American naval strategy throughout the Revolution.


Key Figures


©HistoryMaps


John Paul Jones stands out as one of the most illustrious figures in the history of the Continental Navy. Born in Scotland in 1747, Jones began his maritime career at a young age. He joined the Continental Navy in 1775 and quickly made a name for himself through his daring and successful exploits. Jones is best known for his audacious raid on the British port of Whitehaven and his famous victory aboard the Bonhomme Richard against the HMS Serapis in 1779. His tenacity and tactical brilliance earned him the nickname "Father of the American Navy," and his contributions were instrumental in boosting American morale and prestige.


©HistoryMaps


Esek Hopkins, appointed as the first Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Navy in December 1775, played a pivotal role in its early operations. Hopkins had previously served in the merchant marine and had extensive seafaring experience. His leadership style was characterized by boldness and initiative, though it sometimes led to controversy. One of his significant actions was the raid on New Providence in the Bahamas in March 1776, where his forces captured valuable military supplies. Despite facing criticism and eventual dismissal, Hopkins' efforts laid the groundwork for the fledgling navy's future endeavors.


III. The British Navy


The Royal Navy, during the late 18th century, was one of the most powerful maritime forces in the world. Its strength lay not only in its formidable fleet but also in its innovative strategies and skilled commanders. By the time of the American Revolutionary War, the British Navy had established itself as a dominant force on the high seas, boasting advanced warships, experienced sailors, and a network of global bases that supported its operations.


The capabilities of the Royal Navy were significant. It possessed a large number of ships, ranging from smaller, agile frigates to massive ships of the line armed with numerous cannons. These ships were designed for both speed and firepower, allowing the Royal Navy to project its power across vast distances. The navy also benefited from advanced naval technologies of the time, including improved shipbuilding techniques and more effective cannon designs. This technological edge was crucial in maintaining the Royal Navy's superiority over its adversaries.


©HistoryMaps


Among the notable British naval commanders of this era were Admiral Richard Howe and Admiral George Rodney. Admiral Howe, known for his leadership during the early stages of the American Revolutionary War, played a critical role in blockading American ports and disrupting the supply lines of the Continental Army. His strategic acumen and ability to maintain fleet cohesion under pressure were pivotal in several key naval engagements. Admiral Rodney, on the other hand, is best remembered for his victory at the Battle of the Saintes in 1782. His innovative tactics, including the famous "breaking the line" maneuver, significantly disrupted the French fleet and secured a decisive British victory.


The British naval strategies during this period were multifaceted and aimed at leveraging their maritime superiority. One key strategy was the blockade, where British ships would prevent enemy vessels from entering or leaving ports, thereby choking off supplies and trade. This strategy was effectively employed along the American coastline, severely hampering the American war effort. Additionally, the Royal Navy focused on maintaining control of key strategic points and sea routes, ensuring that they could protect their own merchant shipping while disrupting that of their enemies. These strategies not only had direct military impacts but also exerted economic pressure on Britain's adversaries, contributing to their eventual capitulation.


Major naval battles and engagements highlighted the Royal Navy's prowess and the effectiveness of its strategies. The Battle of Charleston in 1780 was a significant engagement where the British Navy played a crucial role in the capture of the city. The successful blockade and bombardment by the Royal Navy forces led to the surrender of the American defenders, marking one of the war's most substantial British victories. Another notable engagement was the Battle of the Saintes in 1782, where Admiral Rodney's fleet decisively defeated the French Navy. This battle was instrumental in preventing French reinforcements from reaching the American continent and played a part in bringing the war to a close.


Challenges

Despite its strengths, the British Navy faced numerous challenges. Logistical difficulties were a constant issue, as maintaining a fleet across the vast expanse of the Atlantic Ocean required efficient supply lines and well-established bases. The harsh conditions at sea, including disease and adverse weather, took a toll on the sailors and ships alike. Additionally, the Royal Navy had to contend with the growing naval capabilities of its rivals, particularly the French and Spanish fleets, which sought to challenge British dominance. These adversarial forces often cooperated with the American revolutionaries, complicating British naval operations and stretching their resources thin.


IV. French Alliance & Spanish Involvement


Background of French Involvement in the American Revolution

The French involvement in the American Revolution was largely driven by France's desire to weaken its long-standing rival, Great Britain. Following the Seven Years' War (1756-1763), France had suffered significant territorial losses and sought an opportunity to restore its prestige and power. The American struggle for independence provided a perfect opportunity for France to strike at Britain indirectly. Initially, French support for the American cause was covert, involving financial aid and supplies, but it soon evolved into a formal military alliance.


Formation of the Franco-American Alliance

The formation of the Franco-American alliance was a significant turning point in the American Revolutionary War. After the American victory at the Battle of Saratoga in 1777, France saw the potential for a successful rebellion against Britain. Benjamin Franklin, serving as the American ambassador to France, played a crucial role in negotiating the alliance. The Treaty of Amity and Commerce and the Treaty of Alliance were signed in February 1778, formally establishing the Franco-American alliance. France committed to providing military support to the American cause, including troops, supplies, and, crucially, naval forces.


French Naval Leaders: Admiral d'Estaing, Admiral de Grasse

Two prominent French naval leaders during the American Revolutionary War were Admiral Charles Hector, comte d'Estaing, and Admiral François Joseph Paul, comte de Grasse. Admiral d'Estaing was among the first French commanders to arrive in America with a fleet. He participated in several key operations, including the failed Siege of Savannah in 1779. Despite his setbacks, d'Estaing's presence forced the British to divert resources to counter the French threat.


Admiral de Grasse played a decisive role in the later stages of the war. He is best known for his victory at the Battle of the Chesapeake in 1781. De Grasse's fleet blocked the British from relieving their forces at Yorktown, leading to General Cornwallis's surrender. This victory was pivotal in securing American independence.


Contributions to American Victory

The contributions of the French to the American victory were multifaceted. French financial aid, provided even before the formal alliance, was vital in sustaining the Continental Army. French troops, led by commanders like the Marquis de Lafayette, fought alongside American forces in key battles, bringing valuable experience and resources. However, the most significant contribution was the French naval support. French ships helped to protect American coastlines, disrupt British supply lines, and engage the British Navy directly.


The decisive French naval victory at the Battle of the Chesapeake ensured the success of the Siege of Yorktown, effectively sealing the fate of British forces in America. Without French intervention, it is unlikely that the American colonies could have achieved independence from Britain. The Franco-American alliance exemplified the importance of international support in revolutionary movements and highlighted the strategic significance of naval power in determining the outcome of wars.


Spanish Involvement

Spain and the Dutch Republic also played vital roles in the broader conflict, each contributing to the global dimension of the war. Spain, under King Charles III, entered the war against Britain in 1779, following the Treaty of Aranjuez with France. The Spanish aimed to regain territories lost to Britain and support the American cause indirectly by engaging British forces in other theaters.


Spain's involvement extended the war to global theaters, particularly in the Mediterranean and the Caribbean. The Siege of Gibraltar (1779-1783) saw Spanish and French forces attempting to capture this strategic British stronghold. Although the siege was ultimately unsuccessful, it tied down significant British forces. In the Caribbean, the Spanish recaptured Florida, winning battles such as the Siege of Pensacola in 1781, which further stretched British resources.


Spain’s contributions included the notable leadership of Bernardo de Gálvez, the Governor of Spanish Louisiana, who led successful campaigns against British forces along the Gulf Coast. Gálvez's victories in battles such as the Siege of Baton Rouge (1779) and the capture of Mobile (1780) helped secure the Gulf Coast for Spain and hinder British operations.


These joint operations and strategic collaborations between the French, Spanish, and Continental forces were instrumental in undermining British naval supremacy and securing American independence. The diplomatic efforts and military support from France and Spain not only bolstered the Continental Navy but also created a multifront conflict that the British were ill-prepared to handle, ultimately leading to their defeat.


V. Key Naval Battles and Campaigns of the American Revolution


The naval aspect of the American Revolution played a pivotal role in the struggle for independence, often overshadowed by the more well-known land battles. This chapter delves into the key naval battles and campaigns that significantly influenced the course of the war. These engagements showcased strategic ingenuity, the importance of controlling waterways, and the critical support provided by allied navies. Understanding these naval conflicts provides a comprehensive view of the multifaceted nature of the war effort and highlights the bravery and tactical prowess of those who fought at sea.



Battle of Valcour Island

The Battle of Valcour Island, fought on October 11, 1776, was a crucial early engagement during the American Revolution, taking place on Lake Champlain. The battle was strategically significant as it delayed the British advance from Canada, giving the American forces time to prepare for future confrontations.


The American forces, led by Benedict Arnold, recognized the importance of controlling Lake Champlain to prevent a British invasion from Canada into New York. Arnold hastily assembled a fleet of small ships, knowing that a delay would be more advantageous than outright victory. The British, under the command of General Sir Guy Carleton, aimed to secure the lake to provide a clear path for their troops.


Arnold's fleet positioned itself in a narrow strait between Valcour Island and the New York mainland, hoping to force the British into close-quarters combat. On October 11, the British fleet, led by Captain Thomas Pringle, engaged the American ships. Despite being heavily outgunned, Arnold's fleet fought valiantly, using the narrow waters to their advantage. The Americans inflicted significant damage but were ultimately overpowered.


Arnold managed a daring nighttime escape with the remnants of his fleet, although many ships were scuttled to prevent capture. The battle delayed the British advance by several months, which proved critical in the American defense of the Hudson Valley the following year.



Battle of Flamborough Head

The Battle of Flamborough Head, fought on September 23, 1779, was one of the most famous naval battles of the American Revolution. John Paul Jones, commanding the Bonhomme Richard, sought to disrupt British shipping and draw naval resources away from the American coast. The British ship Serapis, commanded by Captain Richard Pearson, engaged Jones off the coast of Flamborough Head in the North Sea.


Jones employed aggressive and unconventional tactics, closing with the Serapis to negate its superior firepower. The two ships became entangled, allowing Jones's crew to board the Serapis. Despite his ship being heavily damaged and on fire, Jones famously declared, "I have not yet begun to fight!" The battle turned in favor of the Americans, and Pearson was forced to surrender.


The victory at Flamborough Head had a profound impact on British morale and naval strategy. It demonstrated that the British Navy was not invincible and that American forces could strike effectively in British waters. The boldness of Jones's tactics inspired both American and European supporters, boosting the revolutionary cause.



Siege of Charleston

The Siege of Charleston, lasting from March 29 to May 12, 1780, was a significant British victory that highlighted the effectiveness of coordinated land and sea operations. The British, under the command of General Sir Henry Clinton and Admiral Mariot Arbuthnot, aimed to capture Charleston, South Carolina, a vital southern port. The British fleet established a blockade, cutting off supplies and reinforcements to the city.


British land forces encircled Charleston, while the naval blockade prevented any escape or relief for the defenders. The Continental Army, commanded by General Benjamin Lincoln, was trapped. After a prolonged siege, Lincoln was forced to surrender, resulting in the largest American capitulation of the war.


The fall of Charleston demonstrated the strategic importance of naval power in supporting land operations and controlling key ports. It also marked a turning point in the British southern campaign, although their ultimate failure to maintain control in the South would later become evident.



Battle of the Chesapeake

The Battle of the Chesapeake, fought on September 5, 1781, was a decisive naval engagement that directly influenced the outcome of the American Revolution. The French fleet, commanded by Admiral François Joseph Paul de Grasse, aimed to block the British fleet from reinforcing or evacuating British troops under General Cornwallis at Yorktown, Virginia. The British, led by Rear Admiral Thomas Graves, sought to break the French blockade.


The two fleets engaged off the Virginia Capes. The battle was tactically inconclusive, with neither side achieving a decisive victory. However, the strategic outcome was a major French success. De Grasse maintained control of the Chesapeake Bay, preventing the British from relieving Cornwallis.


This naval blockade was crucial to the American and French forces' victory at the Siege of Yorktown. Cornwallis's surrender on October 19, 1781, effectively ended major military operations in North America and paved the way for American independence. The Battle of the Chesapeake underscored the critical role of naval power in achieving strategic objectives and securing ultimate victory.


Jones raids and captures in European waters

John Paul Jones, a Scottish-American naval commander, played a pivotal role in the American Revolutionary War by taking the fight directly to British waters. His bold actions in Europe had significant strategic and symbolic importance, bolstering American morale and disrupting British commerce and military operations.


Jones is most famous for his daring raids and captures in European waters. One of his notable exploits was the capture of the HMS Drake off the coast of Ireland in April 1778. This victory was the first time an American warship defeated a British ship in British waters, striking a blow to British naval pride and demonstrating the reach and effectiveness of the fledgling Continental Navy.


In addition to naval engagements, Jones led raids on British coastal towns. One such raid occurred in Whitehaven, Cumbria, in April 1778. Jones and his men landed under the cover of darkness and attempted to set fire to the town's coal ships. Although the raid caused only minor damage, it spread fear and uncertainty along the British coast, illustrating that the war could reach British soil.


Jones's raids and victories in British waters struck at the heart of British confidence. His actions forced the British government and public to recognize that the American Revolution was not a distant conflict but one that could threaten their own shores. Jones's successes helped solidify French support for the American cause. France, already providing crucial aid and military support to the American revolutionaries, saw in Jones's victories the potential for a successful alliance against their common enemy, Britain.


VI. Logistics and Challenges: Supplying the Fleets


During the American Revolutionary War, supplying naval fleets with food, ammunition, and other essential supplies was a formidable challenge. The Continental Navy, hampered by limited resources and infrastructure, often struggled to procure and distribute necessary provisions. Rations primarily consisted of salted meat, hardtack, and dried peas, which were prone to spoilage and infestations. Freshwater storage was also problematic, as barrels often became contaminated. Ammunition, including gunpowder and cannonballs, was in short supply, necessitating careful rationing and reuse. The British Navy, though better supplied, faced logistical issues due to the vast distances from Britain to the American colonies. Supply lines were vulnerable to attacks by privateers and American forces, complicating the regular delivery of food, ammunition, and other vital materials.


Strategic Ports and Dockyards

Strategic ports and dockyards played a pivotal role in naval operations during the American Revolution. Control of these locations often dictated the success of naval campaigns, providing safe harbors, resupply points, and repair facilities essential for sustained naval operations.


Continental Navy Ports

The Continental Navy utilized key ports such as Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston for launching operations and repairs. These ports were chosen for their proximity to British shipping lanes and their ability to support naval logistics. These ports faced constant threats from British blockades and raids aimed at disrupting Continental naval operations and supply lines.


  • Boston: With its natural deep-water harbor, Boston was a crucial naval base, providing a launch point for privateers and warships.
  • Philadelphia: As the capital of the fledgling nation, Philadelphia offered significant shipbuilding and repair facilities, along with a strategic location along the Delaware River.
  • Charleston: This port served as a vital southern base, facilitating operations against British shipping in the Caribbean and along the southern coast.


British Navy Dockyards

The British Navy established major dockyards in Halifax, New York, and Jamaica. These dockyards served as bases for resupply, repair, and launching offensives. Each of these dockyards was fortified and equipped with the necessary infrastructure to support large fleets, ensuring the British could maintain a strong naval presence in the region.


  • Halifax: A fortified dockyard equipped to withstand attacks, Halifax played a key role in supporting the British fleet in North America.
  • New York: As a major strategic base, New York provided extensive infrastructure for the British Navy, enabling sustained operations along the American coast.
  • Jamaica: This dockyard was crucial for British naval operations in the Caribbean, offering facilities for repair and resupply of ships.


Shipyard during the American Revolution ©HistoryMaps.


Repairing Ships: Shipyards and Techniques

Ship repair was crucial to maintaining fleet readiness during the Revolutionary War. Both the Continental and British navies relied on shipyards for maintenance and emergency repairs. The Continental Navy, with limited shipyards, often used makeshift facilities in small ports. Techniques included careening, where ships were beached and tipped to expose their hulls for cleaning and repair. The British, with established dockyards in Halifax, New York, and the Caribbean, could perform more comprehensive repairs, including hull patching, mast replacements, and refitting. The use of copper sheathing on hulls, pioneered by the British, helped prevent biofouling and extended the operational life of ships. Despite these advancements, repairs were labor-intensive and time-consuming, often requiring skilled shipwrights and a steady supply of timber and other materials.


Overcoming Adverse Weather and Sea Conditions

Both the Continental and British navies had to navigate and operate in challenging weather and sea conditions. The Atlantic Ocean's treacherous storms, unpredictable currents, and dense fog posed significant risks to naval operations. Hurricanes in the Caribbean were particularly dangerous, causing shipwrecks and disrupting supply lines. Cold winters and ice in northern ports like Boston and Halifax hindered repairs and resupply efforts. To mitigate these challenges, navies relied on experienced navigators, weather forecasting methods, and robust ship designs capable of withstanding harsh conditions. Despite these efforts, adverse weather remained a constant threat, influencing the timing and success of naval campaigns.


VII. Naval Technology and Shipbuilding



Types of Ships

During the American Revolution, a variety of ships played crucial roles in naval warfare. These vessels ranged from nimble privateers to powerful frigates, each designed for specific tasks and combat scenarios.


Frigates: Frigates were among the most important warships in the Continental Navy. These ships were typically three-masted, with a single gun deck carrying around 28 to 44 cannons. Frigates like the USS Raleigh and the USS Randolph were designed for speed and maneuverability, making them ideal for both commerce raiding and fleet actions. Their design allowed them to engage enemy vessels of similar size and escape larger ships of the line when necessary.


Sloops: Sloops were smaller, single-masted vessels used primarily for reconnaissance, escort duties, and minor skirmishes. These ships carried fewer guns, usually between 10 and 18, and had shallow drafts, allowing them to operate in coastal waters and rivers. The USS Ranger, commanded by John Paul Jones, is a notable example of a sloop that achieved significant success during the war.


Privateers: Privateers were privately owned vessels authorized by the Continental Congress to capture enemy merchant ships. These ships varied widely in size and armament but were typically fast and lightly armed compared to naval warships. Privateers played a crucial role in disrupting British trade, capturing thousands of British vessels and contributing to the economic strain on Britain.


Innovations in Shipbuilding

American shipbuilders made significant advancements and adaptations during the Revolution, often drawing inspiration from foreign designs while addressing unique challenges posed by limited resources and different combat needs. One of the notable American innovations was the construction of ships with enhanced speed and maneuverability. Shipbuilders focused on creating vessels that could operate effectively in the diverse waters of the American coastline, from deep harbors to shallow rivers. The use of native American timber, such as white oak for hulls and pine for masts, provided durability and resilience in various conditions.


Techniques in shipbuilding evolved during the war, incorporating advancements in materials and construction methods. The frame-first method, where the ship's skeleton was constructed before the planking was added, became more widespread. This approach allowed for stronger and more durable vessels. The use of iron reinforcement in key structural areas improved the ships' resilience to damage. The introduction of specialized tools and improved sawmills also expedited the construction process, enabling quicker production of ships.


American shipbuilders often looked to European designs for inspiration, incorporating elements from British, French, and Dutch ships. The French, in particular, influenced American ship design, as seen in the construction of frigates like the USS Alliance, which borrowed heavily from French naval architecture. These influences helped the Americans create ships that were competitive with European vessels.


The Continental Navy initially relied on converted merchant vessels, but as the war progressed, purpose-built warships became more common. Frigates, with their balanced combination of speed, maneuverability, and firepower, were particularly favored. Notable examples include the USS Alliance and USS Constitution, which featured robust hulls and impressive armaments. The British Royal Navy also saw innovations, such as the development of more heavily armed ships-of-the-line, which were essential for maintaining naval dominance. These ships featured multiple gun decks and a higher number of cannons, allowing them to deliver devastating broadsides.


Shipbuilding

Shipbuilding during the Revolutionary War was concentrated in several key locations, each leveraging local resources and expertise. In the American colonies, major shipbuilding centers included Boston, Philadelphia, and Baltimore. These cities had established shipyards that produced both merchant and warships. American shipbuilders used a variety of techniques, often employing locally sourced timber, such as white oak for hulls and pine for masts. The British Royal Navy, with its extensive network of shipyards, built and maintained its fleet in locations such as Portsmouth, Plymouth, and Chatham in England, as well as overseas dockyards in Halifax and the Caribbean.


Resource constraints were a significant challenge for American shipbuilders. The colonies lacked the established shipyards, skilled labor, and materials available to European powers. To overcome these limitations, American shipbuilders utilized innovative methods, such as constructing ships in remote locations to avoid British blockades and using captured British ships as templates for new designs. Additionally, the Continental Congress and state governments provided funding and resources to support shipbuilding efforts, despite the economic hardships of the war.


Comparison with British Shipbuilding Techniques

British shipbuilding techniques were highly advanced and standardized, benefiting from a well-established naval infrastructure. The British Royal Navy had access to large, state-of-the-art shipyards and a steady supply of materials from their global empire. British ships were typically built for endurance and heavy combat, with ships of the line carrying up to 100 guns across multiple decks.


In contrast, American ships were often built for versatility and speed, as the Continental Navy and privateers needed to evade larger British fleets and conduct hit-and-run attacks. While the British focused on constructing large, heavily armed vessels, the Americans emphasized smaller, more agile ships that could navigate the challenging coastal and riverine environments of North America.


Armaments and Naval Innovations

Armaments during the Revolutionary War were a critical aspect of naval power. Ships were equipped with various types of cannons, including long guns and carronades. Long guns, with their extended range, were ideal for engaging enemies at a distance, while carronades, known for their shorter range and higher explosive power, were effective in close combat. The Continental Navy, limited in resources, often utilized a mix of captured British cannons and domestically produced weapons. Innovations in naval technology included improved gun carriages, which allowed for faster reloading and better accuracy. The use of heated shot, designed to set enemy ships on fire, was another significant development. Additionally, the introduction of copper sheathing on ship hulls, pioneered by the British, reduced biofouling and increased the speed and longevity of vessels.


VIII. Privateering during the American Revolution



Role of Privateers in the Revolution

Privateers were privately owned vessels authorized by a government to capture enemy ships during wartime. Unlike pirates, privateers operated under a "letter of marque," a legal document issued by a sovereign nation that granted them permission to conduct naval warfare against enemy merchant ships. This letter legitimized their actions, distinguishing them from unlawful pirates and providing a legal framework for their operations.


Patriot Privateers

Privateers significantly contributed to the American war effort by disrupting British supply lines and capturing valuable cargo. They supplemented the relatively small Continental Navy, adding hundreds of ships to the American naval presence. These private vessels harassed British merchant ships, capturing supplies, ammunition, and other goods critical to the British war effort. The economic strain caused by these captures forced Britain to divert naval resources to protect its merchant fleet, thereby reducing the pressure on American naval and ground forces.


By the end of the war, American privateers had captured around 2,000 British ships, significantly disrupting British trade. This threat led to a dramatic increase in insurance rates for British merchant vessels. The loss of merchant ships and cargoes reduced Britain's ability to supply its military forces and affected its overall economic health, weakening British resolve and contributing to the eventual decision to negotiate peace.


Privateering also provided a substantial boost to the American economy during the war. The captured goods and vessels were sold at auction, with proceeds distributed among the privateer owners and crews. This influx of wealth helped sustain the American war effort, providing funds for supplies, arms, and other necessities. The profits from privateering ventures incentivized investment in new ships and crews, creating a cycle of economic activity that supported the broader revolutionary cause.


Loyalist Privateers

Loyalist privateers also played a notable role during the American Revolution, often operating from British-controlled ports such as New York, Charleston, and Halifax. These privateers were American colonists who remained loyal to the British Crown and, like their Patriot counterparts, received letters of marque from the British government.


Loyalist privateers primarily targeted American merchant ships, disrupting trade and supply lines. This created a dual-front maritime conflict, with privateers on both sides attacking enemy commerce, leading to a complex and chaotic naval war environment. From 1776 to 1782, Loyalist privateers captured around 1,500 American vessels, creating shortages in supplies and increasing the cost of goods in American markets.


The activities of Loyalist privateers strained the Continental Navy, which had to divert resources to protect merchant shipping from their attacks. They also impacted the morale and economic conditions in the American colonies. By targeting American coastal towns and shipping routes, they forced local militias to defend these areas, diverting them from other military engagements.


The economic effects of privateering, both Patriot and Loyalist, were profound. The loss of ships and goods created supply shortages that affected both civilian and military populations in the colonies.


IX. Sailors and Marines


Recruitment and Training

Recruitment for the Continental Navy and Marine Corps during the American Revolution was a challenging process. The Continental Navy, established in 1775, relied heavily on volunteers, many of whom were drawn from coastal communities with maritime experience. Pressing, or forced enlistment, was also employed, though it was less common than in the British Navy. The Marine Corps, created in November 1775, recruited men from the colonies, often focusing on those with previous military experience.


Training for both sailors and marines was rudimentary compared to modern standards. Sailors learned essential skills such as knot tying, sail handling, and basic navigation through hands-on experience aboard ships. Marines, who served as shipboard infantry and participated in amphibious assaults, underwent basic infantry training, including marksmanship, drill, and boarding tactics. Training was conducted by experienced officers and non-commissioned officers, who passed on their knowledge through direct supervision and on-the-job instruction.


Daily Routines and Challenges Faced by Sailors and Marines

Life aboard ships during the American Revolution was arduous and demanding. Sailors and marines adhered to strict routines to maintain discipline and ensure the smooth operation of their vessels. Sailors were responsible for maintaining the ship, handling sails, navigating, and operating the ship's guns. They worked in shifts, or watches, ensuring that the ship was manned and operational at all times. Marines performed guard duty, manned the ship's armaments during engagements, and maintained discipline aboard the vessel. The work was physically demanding and often dangerous, particularly during rough weather or combat.


Health, Diet, and Living Conditions

Life aboard ship was communal, with sailors and marines sleeping in hammocks slung between decks. Meals, consisting primarily of salted meat, hardtack, and dried peas, were prepared in a communal galley. Freshwater was rationed, and the lack of fresh food often led to nutritional deficiencies such as scurvy. Leisure time was limited, but sailors and marines found ways to entertain themselves through singing, storytelling, and gambling.


The diet of sailors and marines consisted mainly of salted meat, hardtack (a type of dry biscuit), and dried peas or beans. Freshwater was scarce and often rationed, with beer or rum provided as a substitute. Living conditions were cramped, with sailors sleeping in hammocks strung up in the lower decks. These tight quarters facilitated the spread of disease and made for an uncomfortable and unhygienic living environment.


Challenges and Hardships

The challenges and hardships faced by sailors and marines during the American Revolution were numerous and severe. One of the most significant challenges was disease, which spread rapidly in the close quarters of a ship. Common illnesses included dysentery, smallpox, and scurvy, the latter resulting from a lack of fresh fruits and vegetables. Medical care was rudimentary, with ship's surgeons often lacking formal training and supplies.


Discipline aboard ships was strict, and punishments for infractions were harsh. Flogging, confinement, and even execution for severe offenses were used to maintain order and discipline. The harsh conditions, combined with the constant threat of battle, took a psychological toll on the crew.


Weather and environmental conditions also posed significant challenges. Sailors and marines had to contend with storms, high seas, and extreme temperatures, which could make daily tasks dangerous and exhausting. The physical demands of handling sails, operating guns, and maintaining the ship required significant strength and endurance.



Formation and Role of the Continental Marines

The Continental Marines were established on November 10, 1775, by a resolution of the Continental Congress, which called for the raising of two battalions of marines. The primary mission of the Marines was to serve as a landing force for naval operations, capable of conducting amphibious assaults, boarding actions, and providing security on ships.


One of the first missions of the Continental Marines was the raid on Nassau in the Bahamas in March 1776. Led by Captain Samuel Nicholas, the Marines captured the island and its valuable stores of gunpowder and munitions, providing a significant boost to the American war effort. Captain Samuel Nicholas, the first Commandant of the Marine Corps, played a crucial role in shaping the early Marine Corps. His leadership during the raid on Nassau and other engagements established the reputation of the Marines as a formidable fighting force. Other notable figures included Major William Ward Burrows, who later became the second Commandant and was instrumental in reorganizing and expanding the Marine Corps.


Fighting Tops depicting U.S. Continental Marines firing the 1766 Navy pattern Charleville musket on the USS Alliance in 1781 by Col Charles Waterhouse.


Evolution of Marine Corps Tactics and Organization

Throughout the Revolutionary War, the tactics and organization of the Marine Corps evolved. Initially focused on shipboard duties and amphibious operations, the Marines adapted to various combat scenarios. They participated in both naval engagements and land battles, showcasing their versatility and combat effectiveness.


The structure of the Marine Corps was relatively small compared to other military branches, but their specialized training and role in naval warfare made them a valuable asset. The Marines developed tactics for boarding enemy ships, securing beachheads during amphibious landings, and providing sharpshooting support during naval battles.


X. Aftermath and Legacy


Post-War Naval and Marine Developments

Following the American Revolution, the fledgling United States faced the challenge of protecting its interests without a strong naval force. The Continental Navy was disbanded, and the remaining ships were sold or scrapped. However, the need for a capable naval force soon became apparent, particularly with threats from Barbary pirates and the need to protect American merchant shipping.


Establishment of the U.S. Navy

The U.S. Navy was officially established with the Naval Act of 1794, which authorized the construction of six frigates, including the famous USS Constitution. These ships were designed to be heavily armed and fast, capable of defending American interests against both pirates and more powerful naval adversaries. The establishment of the U.S. Navy marked a commitment to maintaining a permanent naval force, with a focus on shipbuilding, naval infrastructure, and professional training.


Similarly, the Marine Corps was reestablished in 1798, ensuring the continued presence of marines in American military operations. The reestablished Marine Corps maintained the tradition of serving aboard naval vessels and participating in amphibious operations, building on the experiences and lessons learned during the Revolution.


The Revolutionary War provided several key lessons for American naval and marine forces. One significant lesson was the importance of flexibility and innovation in naval tactics. The use of privateers and the success of smaller, faster ships demonstrated the value of speed and maneuverability over sheer firepower. These lessons were applied in future conflicts, such as the Quasi-War with France and the War of 1812, where American naval forces often relied on hit-and-run tactics and strategic engagements.


The experience of coordinating naval and land operations also underscored the importance of joint operations. The success of combined forces during the Siege of Yorktown and other battles influenced the development of doctrines that emphasized the integration of naval and ground forces, a principle that continues to be a cornerstone of modern military strategy.


Long-term Impact on Naval and Amphibious Warfare

The American Revolution had a lasting impact on global naval and marine strategies. The effective use of privateers and smaller warships influenced naval tactics worldwide, highlighting the importance of economic warfare and the disruption of enemy supply lines. Nations began to recognize the value of maintaining versatile naval forces capable of both traditional fleet actions and unconventional warfare.


The success of the Continental Marines in amphibious operations also set a precedent for future marine forces. The integration of marines as specialized troops capable of operating both at sea and on land influenced the development of marine corps in other nations, emphasizing the role of marines in modern amphibious warfare.


The legacy of the Revolutionary War is deeply embedded in American naval and marine history. Figures like John Paul Jones and Samuel Nicholas are celebrated as pioneers who established the foundations of American naval and marine traditions. Their contributions laid the groundwork for the United States to become a dominant naval power, with a focus on innovation, flexibility, and joint operations.


The experiences and successes of the Revolutionary War informed the strategic doctrines and organizational structures of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, ensuring their preparedness for future conflicts. The lessons learned during the Revolution continue to influence American naval and marine tactics and strategies to this day.


Conclusion


The American Revolution showcased the critical role of naval and marine warfare in achieving independence. The Continental Navy and privateers disrupted British supply lines and captured valuable resources, which, along with key battles like Valcour Island, Flamborough Head, Charleston, and the Chesapeake, were essential to the American war effort. The involvement of foreign navies, particularly the French, provided crucial support that significantly influenced the war's outcome. Life aboard ships was challenging, but the dedication of sailors and marines, along with the leadership of figures like John Paul Jones and Samuel Nicholas, played a pivotal role. The post-war establishment of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps and the lessons learned from the Revolution shaped future naval strategies and tactics. Traditions such as the Marine Corps' birthday and ship christening ceremonies remain integral to naval culture.


Naval and marine warfare were instrumental in securing American independence, demonstrating the importance of disrupting enemy logistics, engaging in effective naval battles, and conducting amphibious operations. The support from foreign navies highlighted the value of international alliances. The American Revolution's legacy includes significant advancements in naval tactics, ship design, and the integration of marine forces, principles that continue to guide modern naval and marine strategies. These contributions underscore the enduring importance of naval power in achieving strategic military objectives.


Appendix I: Timeline of Major Naval Events During the American Revolution


1775

  • October 13, 1775: Continental Congress establishes the Continental Navy.
  • November 1775: Continental Navy’s first squadron, commanded by Commodore Esek Hopkins, sets sail from Philadelphia.
  • December 1775: The British Royal Navy imposes a blockade on the American coastline.

1776

  • March 3, 1776: The Continental Navy captures New Providence Island in the Bahamas, securing much-needed military supplies.
  • April 6, 1776: The Continental Congress authorizes privateering, allowing privately-owned ships to capture British merchant vessels.

1777

  • September 1777: British forces capture Philadelphia, leading to significant naval engagements in the Delaware River.

1778

  • February 6, 1778: France recognizes American independence and signs treaties of alliance and commerce with the United States.
  • March 1778: The Continental Navy’s frigate, USS Alfred, is captured by the British.
  • April 1778: Continental Navy Captain John Paul Jones captures the British ship Drake, demonstrating American naval capability.
  • July 1778: French Navy’s arrival in American waters disrupts British naval operations.
  • August 1778: The Battle of Rhode Island, with French naval forces playing a critical role.

1779

  • September 1779: John Paul Jones, commanding the Bonhomme Richard, wins a significant victory over the British warship HMS Serapis in the Battle of Flamborough Head.
  • October 1779: The French fleet under Admiral d'Estaing assists in the failed Franco-American Siege of Savannah.

1780

  • August 1780: Arrival of French reinforcements under Admiral de Ternay at Newport, Rhode Island.
  • December 1780: British forces under Benedict Arnold capture Richmond, Virginia, impacting naval operations in the Chesapeake Bay.

1781

  • March 1781: The British fleet defeats a French fleet at the Battle of the Cape Henry.
  • September 1781: The decisive Battle of the Chesapeake (also known as the Battle of the Virginia Capes) where the French fleet under Admiral de Grasse defeats the British fleet, cutting off British General Cornwallis’s escape route by sea.
  • October 19, 1781: The Siege of Yorktown concludes with British General Cornwallis’s surrender, effectively ending major combat operations.

1782

  • April 1782: Battle of the Saintes, where the British fleet under Admiral Rodney defeats the French fleet in the Caribbean, impacting future naval engagements.

1783

  • September 3, 1783: Treaty of Paris is signed, officially ending the American Revolutionary War and recognizing American independence.


Ask Herodotus


herodotus-image

សួរសំណួរនៅទីនេះ




HistoryMaps Shop

Heroes of the American Revolution Painting

Explore the rich history of the American Revolution through this captivating painting of the Continental Army. Perfect for history enthusiasts and art collectors, this piece brings to life the bravery and struggles of early American soldiers.



References


  • Beatson, Robert (1804). Naval and Military Memoirs of Great Britain, from 1727 to 1783. Vol. 4. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees & Orme. ISBN 978-0-8398-0189-4. OCLC 669129181.
  • Benedetto, William R. (2006). Sailing Into the Abyss: A True Story of Extreme Heroism on the High Seas. New York: Citadel Press. ISBN 978-0-8065-2646-1. OCLC 70683882.
  • Brooks, Victor (1999). The Boston Campaign. Combined Publishing. ISBN 1-58097-007-9. OCLC 833471799.
  • Callo, Joseph F (2006). John Paul Jones: America's First Sea Warrior. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-102-0. OCLC 62281463.
  • Campbell, Charles (1860). History of the Colony and Ancient Dominion of Virginia. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. OCLC 2109795.
  • Carrington, Henry Beebe (1876). Battles of the American Revolution, 1775–1781. New York: A. S. Barnes. OCLC 33205321.
  • Caulkins, Frances Manwaring; Griswold, Cecelia (1895). History of New London, Connecticut: From the First Survey of the Coast in 1612 to 1860. New London, Connecticut: H. D. Utley. OCLC 1856358.
  • Chamberlain, Mellen, ed. (1908). A Documentary History of Chelsea: Including the Boston Precincts of Winnisimmet, Rumney Marsh, and Pullen Point 1624–1824. Vol. 2. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society. OCLC 1172330.
  • Charles, Patrick J (2008). Irreconcilable Grievances: The Events That Shaped American Independence. Westminster, Maryland: Heritage Books. ISBN 978-0-7884-4566-8. OCLC 212838026.
  • Coleman, Kenneth (1991). A History of Georgia. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-1269-9. OCLC 21975722.
  • Colomb, Philip (1895). Naval Warfare, its Ruling Principles and Practice Historically Treated. London: W. H. Allen. OCLC 2863262.
  • Daughan, George (2011) [2008]. If By Sea: The Forging of the American Navy—from the Revolution to the War of 1812. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02514-5. OCLC 701015376.
  • Davis, Burke (1970). The Campaign That Won America: the Story of Yorktown. New York: Dial Press. OCLC 248958859.
  • Dearden, Paul F. (1980). The Rhode Island Campaign of 1778. Providence, RI: Rhode Island Bicentennial Federation. ISBN 978-0-917012-17-4. OCLC 60041024.
  • Douglas, W. A. B. (1979). "BYRON, JOHN". Dictionary of Canadian Biography. Vol. 4. University of Toronto/Université Laval. Retrieved 21 November 2016.
  • Drisko, George Washington (1904). Narrative of the Town of Machias, the Old and the New, the Early and Late. Press of the Republican. OCLC 6479739.
  • Dull, Jonathan R (1975). The French Navy and American Independence: A Study of Arms and Diplomacy, 1774–1787. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-06920-3. OCLC 1500030.
  • Duncan, Roger F. (1992). Coastal Maine: A Maritime History. New York: Norton. ISBN 0-393-03048-2. OCLC 24142698.
  • Ferling, John E (2010). The Ascent of George Washington: The Hidden Political Genius of an American Icon. New York: Bloomsbury Press. ISBN 978-1-60819-095-9. OCLC 462908150.
  • Field, Edward (1898). Esek Hopkins, Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Navy During the American Revolution, 1775 to 1778. Providence: Preston & Rounds. OCLC 3430958.
  • French, Allen (1911). The Siege of Boston. Macmillan. OCLC 3927532.
  • Grainger, John D. (2005). The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: A Reassessment. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-137-2. OCLC 57311901.
  • Gruber, Ira (1972). The Howe Brothers and the American Revolution. New York: Atheneum Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1229-7. OCLC 1464455.
  • Howarth, Stephen (1999). To Shining Sea: a History of the United States Navy, 1775–1998. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. ISBN 0-8061-3026-1. OCLC 40200083.
  • Ketchum, Richard M (1999). Decisive Day: The Battle for Bunker Hill. New York: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-0-8050-6099-7. OCLC 40644809.
  • Ketchum, Richard M (2004). Victory at Yorktown: the Campaign That Won the Revolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-0-8050-7396-6. OCLC 54461977.
  • Larrabee, Harold A (1964). Decision at the Chesapeake. New York: Clarkson N. Potter. OCLC 426234.
  • Leamon, James S (1995). Revolution Downeast: The War for American Independence in Maine. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. ISBN 978-0-87023-959-5.
  • Leckie, Robert (1993). George Washington's War: The Saga of the American Revolution. New York: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-092215-3. OCLC 29748139.
  • Linder, Bruce (2005). Tidewater's Navy: an Illustrated History. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-59114-465-6. OCLC 60931416.
  • Lockhart, Paul (2008). The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army. New York: Smithsonian Books (HarperCollins). ISBN 978-0-06-145163-8. OCLC 191930840.
  • Mahan, Alfred Thayer (1890). the Influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. OCLC 8673260.
  • Mahan, Alfred Thayer (1898). Major Operations of the Royal Navy, 1762–1783. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. OCLC 3012050.
    McCullough, David (2005). 1776. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-7432-2672-0. OCLC 57557578.
  • Miller, Nathan (1974). Sea of Glory: The Continental Navy Fights for Independence, 1775–1783. New York: David McKay Company. ISBN 978-0-679-50392-7. OCLC 844299. Retrieved 16 December 2016.
  • Miller, Nathan (1997). The U.S. Navy: A History (3rd ed.). Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-595-0. OCLC 37211290.
  • Morgan, William James (1959). Captains to the Northward. Barre, MA: Barre Publishing. OCLC 1558276.
  • Morison, Samuel Eliot (1999) [1959]. John Paul Jones: A Sailor's Biography. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-55750-410-4. OCLC 42716061.
  • Morrill, Dan (1993). Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution. Baltimore: The Nautical & Aviation Publishing Company of America. ISBN 1-877853-21-6. OCLC 29357639.
  • Morrissey, Brendan (1995). Boston 1775: The Shot Heard Around the World. London: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85532-362-9. OCLC 33042763.
  • Morrissey, Brendan (1997). Yorktown 1781: the World Turned Upside Down. London: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-85532-688-0. OCLC 39028166.
  • Nelson, Paul David (1985). Anthony Wayne, Soldier of the Early Republic. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-30751-4. OCLC 11518827.
  • Nelson, James L. (2008). George Washington's Secret Navy: How the American Revolution Went to Sea. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-07-149389-5. OCLC 212627064.
  • Nelson, Paul David (1996). Sir Charles Grey, First Earl Grey: Royal Soldier, Family Patriarch. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. ISBN 978-0-8386-3673-2. OCLC 33820307.
  • Perkins, James Breck (1911). France in the American Revolution. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. OCLC 177577.
  • Russell, David Lee (2000). The American Revolution in the Southern Colonies. Jefferson, NC: McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-0783-5. OCLC 44562323.
  • Schaeper, Thomas (2011). Edward Bancroft: Scientist, Author, Spy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-11842-1. OCLC 178289618.
  • Sweetman, Jack (2002). American Naval History: An Illustrated Chronology of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps, 1775–present. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-867-4. OCLC 48046120.
  • Thomas, Evan (2004). John Paul Jones: Sailor, Hero, Father of the American Navy. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-5804-3. OCLC 56321227.
  • Troude, Onésime-Joachim (1867). Batailles navales de la France (in French). Vol. 2. Challamel ainé. OCLC 18683121.
  • Volo, James M (2008). Blue Water Patriots: The American Revolution Afloat. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-6120-5. OCLC 209652239.
  • Ward, Christopher (1952). War of the Revolution. New York: Macmillan. OCLC 214962727.

Page last updated: Mon Jul 01 2024

Support HM Project

មានវិធីជាច្រើនដើម្បីជួយគាំទ្រគម្រោង HistoryMaps ។
New & Updated