Support HistoryMaps

Settings

Dark Mode

Voice Narration

3D Map

MapStyle
HistoryMaps Last Updated: 02/01/2025

© 2025 HM


AI History Chatbot

Ask Herodotus

Play Audio

Instructions: How it Works


Enter your Question / Request and hit enter or click the submit button. You can ask or request in any language. Here are some examples:


  • Quiz me on the American Revolution.
  • Suggest some books on the Ottoman Empire.
  • What were the causes of the Thirty Year's War?
  • Tell me something interesting about the Han Dynasty.
  • Give me the phases of the Hundred Years’ War.
herodotus-image

Do you have a question about History?


ask herodotus
History of Chile Timeline

History of Chile Timeline

Appendices

Footnotes

References

Page Last Updated: 01/05/2025


1541

History of Chile

History of Chile

Video

For thousands of years, indigenous groups like the Mapuche thrived in the region of what is now Chile, developing rich cultural traditions and complex societies. Their world changed irrevocably in the 16th century when Spanish conquistadors arrived, claiming the land for the Crown and founding settlements like Santiago in 1541. The Mapuche fiercely resisted colonization, engaging in prolonged conflicts with the Spanish that spanned centuries.


The echoes of revolution swept through Chile in the early 19th century, as the region, inspired by the ideals of independence coursing through Latin America, broke away from Spanish rule. Figures such as Bernardo O’Higgins emerged as leaders of this movement, and by 1818, Chile declared itself an independent republic. The new nation struggled to find stability in its early years but soon embarked on a journey of nation-building, characterized by territorial expansion and economic growth.


The late 19th century saw Chile asserting itself regionally through conflicts like the War of the Pacific (1879–1884), which pitted the nation against Peru and Bolivia. The war’s outcome cemented Chile’s control over valuable nitrate-rich territories, fueling its economy but leaving lingering tensions with its neighbors. This period of prosperity, however, was not without its challenges. By the 20th century, the country faced profound social and economic inequalities, setting the stage for political upheaval.


Chile's modern history has been marked by sharp contrasts. In the 1970s, socialist President Salvador Allende attempted sweeping reforms to address inequality, but his policies polarized the nation. A military coup in 1973, led by General Augusto Pinochet, ushered in a brutal dictatorship that lasted 17 years. Pinochet’s regime was characterized by widespread human rights abuses but also by economic reforms that opened Chile to global markets. These reforms laid the foundation for the country’s modern economy but left deep scars on its social fabric. As the dictatorship ended in 1990, Chile transitioned to democracy, beginning a new chapter of reconciliation and progress.

Page Last Updated: 01/05/2025
14000 BCE
Pre-Columbian Era
Ancient and Early History of Chile
Ancient and Early History of Chile © Pierre Joubert

The precolonial history of Chile traces the story of human settlement and cultural development in the region long before European explorers arrived. This narrative begins with the migration of humans to the Americas, a subject of much scholarly debate. Paul Rivet’s widely accepted theory suggests that these early settlers arrived through multiple routes, including migrations across the Bering Strait from Asia and voyages across the Pacific from Polynesia and Melanesia. Some of these migrants eventually reached the territory now known as Chile.


Early Settlement: Monte Verde and Beyond

One of the most significant archaeological sites in precolonial Chile is Monte Verde, located near modern-day Puerto Montt. Dating back approximately 13,000 to 15,000 years, Monte Verde provides some of the earliest evidence of human habitation in the Americas.[1] Artifacts from this site, including tools and remnants of dwellings, suggest that its inhabitants lived in small, organized communities that relied on hunting, gathering, and possibly rudimentary agriculture.


Regional distribution of pre-Columbian indigenous peoples of Chile. © Anonymous

Regional distribution of pre-Columbian indigenous peoples of Chile. © Anonymous


Regional Societies and Cultures

Over thousands of years, diverse indigenous cultures emerged across Chile, shaped by its varied geography. In the northern regions, the Atacama Desert and Andean highlands were home to the Aymara and Atacameño peoples. By the 11th century CE, these groups practiced agriculture influenced by Incan techniques, cultivating crops such as maize and quinoa and domesticating llamas and alpacas. The Chinchorro people along the coast are particularly notable for their early practice of mummification, predating even the ancient Egyptians.


In the central and southern zones, the Mapuche, Picunche, and Huilliche formed semi-nomadic societies. The Mapuche, in particular, became one of the most prominent and enduring groups, known for their adaptability and fierce independence. Their territory extended across the valleys and forests of central Chile, where they subsisted on a mix of agriculture, hunting, and fishing.


In the austral regions, where the climate was harsher, smaller and more dispersed groups such as the Chonos, Yaghan, Alacalufe, and Ona adapted to their environment by relying on fishing, foraging, and marine resources. These societies often crafted sophisticated tools and boats, facilitating their survival in challenging conditions.


On Easter Island, a Polynesian culture developed in isolation. The island’s inhabitants created the famous moai statues, reflecting a complex society with advanced engineering and a rich spiritual life. This culture continues to influence Rapa Nui descendants today.


Cultural Complexity and Interactions

Throughout precolonial Chile, different groups maintained distinct ways of life while interacting through trade, warfare, and alliances. In the north, some cultures came under the influence of the expansive Inca Empire in the 15th century, particularly in regions like the Atacama. However, farther south, the Mapuche resisted Incan advances, maintaining their autonomy.


As Europeans approached Chile's shores in the 16th century, they encountered a land rich in cultural diversity and deeply rooted traditions, setting the stage for dramatic changes in the region’s history.

Chinchorro Culture

7000 BCE Jan 1 - 1500 BCE

Atacama Desert, Antofagasta, C

Chinchorro Culture
Head of a Chinchorro mummy. © Pablo Trincado

Video

The Chinchorro culture of northern Chile and southern Peru is one of the most intriguing preceramic societies in the world. Emerging around 9,100 years ago (7,000 BCE) and lasting until roughly 3,500 years ago (1,500 BCE), this sedentary culture thrived in the arid coastal regions of the Atacama Desert. Renowned for their elaborate mummification practices, the Chinchorro left behind a legacy that continues to captivate archaeologists and anthropologists.


Origins and Geography

The Chinchorro culture developed in a challenging yet resource-rich environment along the Pacific coast. Freshwater availability in the otherwise arid landscape supported their settlement in areas near modern-day Arica, Chile, and southern Peru. While their core region stretched between Arica and Caleta Camarones, archaeological evidence of their activities extends along the coastline and into inland valleys.


Early sites such as Quebrada Jaguay and Quebrada Tacahuay, dating back to the late Pleistocene (around 11,000 BCE), indicate a gradual evolution from earlier hunter-gatherer communities to the Chinchorro's distinctive way of life.


Lifestyle and Economy

The Chinchorro were expert fishermen, relying heavily on the ocean for sustenance. Their diet was predominantly marine-based, including fish, shellfish, and sea mammals, supplemented by minimal terrestrial plants and animals. Sophisticated fishing tools, such as hooks crafted from shells and cactus, as well as stone net weights, reveal their advanced maritime skills. They also wove intricate baskets and mats, suggesting a community with well-developed crafts.


Mummification Practices

The Chinchorro are most famous for their mummies, which predate those of ancient Egypt by millennia. Their mummification practices evolved over time, starting around 7,000 BCE and reaching their peak by 5,000 BCE. Unlike many other cultures, the Chinchorro did not reserve mummification for the elite. Instead, individuals of all ages, including infants, were preserved, reflecting a deep communal and emotional connection to the dead.


Early techniques involved removing flesh from the body, reconstructing it with sticks, clay, and reeds, and applying pigments like black manganese or later red ochre. These elaborate processes transformed the deceased into enduring representations of their former selves, complete with masks featuring characteristic openings for the eyes, nose, and mouth.


High arsenic levels in the local environment may have contributed to high infant mortality, which some scholars suggest could have inspired these practices as a way to honor and cope with the loss.


Cultural Evolution and Decline

Around 4,000 years ago, influences from the Andean highlands began to shape Chinchorro society. These included agricultural practices, ceramics, and possibly elements of the Tiwanaku and Wankarani cultures. During this transitional phase, the Chinchorro culture gradually integrated with emerging Andean traditions.


By 3,500 years ago, the Chinchorro's unique practices faded as they were absorbed into the broader Andean cultural framework. Mummification ceased, and new traditions emerged in the Azapa Valley and surrounding regions.

Mapuche

600 BCE Jan 1

Araucania, Chile

Mapuche
Mapuche. © Anonymous

The Araucanians, a collective term for the indigenous peoples of south-central Chile, were a fragmented society of hunters, gatherers, and farmers. They lived in scattered family clusters and small villages, engaging in trade and periodic warfare with neighboring groups. Despite the lack of a written language, they shared a common tongue, facilitating communication across the region. Those in central Chile tended to be more settled, employing irrigation for agriculture, while those in the south combined slash-and-burn farming with hunting. The Araucanians include different ethnic sub-groups which included the Mapuche (people of the land), Picunche, Huilliche, et al.


At the time of the Spanish arrival in the 1530s, the Araucanians were one of the largest Native American groups in Chile, with a population estimated at 1.5 million. However, the combination of European conquest and devastating diseases halved their numbers within a century. The Mapuche, in particular, quickly adapted to the challenges posed by the Spanish, incorporating horses and European weaponry into their traditional arsenal of clubs, bows, and arrows. Their adaptability and guerrilla tactics allowed them to raid Spanish settlements effectively and maintain their resistance until the late 19th century. Archaeological evidence places Mapuche culture in Chile as early as 600–500 BCE,[2] making them one of the most enduring indigenous groups in South America.


Origins and Genetic Background

The genetic distinctiveness of the Mapuche sets them apart from other indigenous peoples in Patagonia and South America. Studies suggest a long period of separation or a unique origin. Some researchers propose that the Mapuche descend partly from peoples migrating from the Amazon Basin via two routes: the Central Andean highlands and the eastern Bolivian lowlands through the Argentine Northwest. Other hypotheses, such as Ricardo Latcham's, suggest a migration from the Pampas east of the Andes, although this idea lacks conclusive evidence and is debated among scholars.


Additional theories propose links to coastal peoples like the Changos or even northern groups like the Aymaras, possibly driven south by conflicts in the Andean region. These diverse theories reflect the complexity of tracing Mapuche ancestry, as well as the enduring enigma of their cultural development.


Cultural Development and Linguistic Connections

The Mapuche language, Mapudungun, remains a linguistic isolate, with no definitive connections to other language families. However, various linguists have suggested links to languages such as Pano-Tacanan, Arawakan, or even Mayan. Borrowed words from the Puquina language of the Tiwanaku culture point to cultural interactions during the post-Tiwanaku period (after 1000 CE). These influences likely accompanied the spread of agricultural practices such as raised and canalized fields, as seen in areas like Budi Lake and Lumaco Valley.


Cultural parallels between the Mapuche and Andean civilizations extend to mythologies and cosmologies, suggesting significant exchange or shared cultural roots.


Archaeological Evidence and Settlements

Archaeological finds link the Mapuche to various ancient cultures within Chile. For instance, connections have been proposed between the Mapuche and the El Molle culture in the Norte Chico region. Mapuche presence in areas like southern Diaguita lands predates Spanish colonization, evidenced by toponyms and other cultural markers. These communities likely developed complex social and economic structures, blending indigenous traditions with influences from Andean cultures.


Possible Polynesian Contact

An intriguing aspect of Mapuche history is the possibility of pre-Columbian contact with Polynesians. This hypothesis gained attention when chicken bones found on the Arauco Peninsula were carbon-dated to 1304–1424, predating European arrival. The DNA from these bones showed similarities to Polynesian chickens but remains a topic of debate, as later analyses suggested possible European or Asian origins.


Further evidence includes skulls with Polynesian features found on Mocha Island, once inhabited by the Mapuche. Some scholars have identified similarities in language and cultural artifacts, such as the Mapuche clava hand club, which resembles the Maori wahaika. Words like toki (axe), kuri (black), and piti (small) are shared between Mapuche and Polynesian languages, adding weight to the theory of contact.


The Tiwanaku Influence

The collapse of the Tiwanaku Empire around 1000 CE may have had a ripple effect on Mapuche society. As displaced populations sought new environments, they likely introduced agricultural techniques and cultural elements to Mapuche lands. This influence is evident in the adoption of advanced farming systems and the integration of Puquina loanwords into Mapudungun.


The Mapuche's adaptability and resilience allowed them to establish a distinct identity that has endured for centuries. While their exact origins remain a topic of scholarly debate, the Mapuche culture is a testament to the dynamic interplay of migration, adaptation, and interaction in precolonial South America. Their rich heritage, unique language, and historical contributions continue to shape the cultural landscape of modern Chile.

Diaguita Culture

1000 Jan 1

Jujuy, Argentina

Diaguita Culture
The Ruins of Quilmes were built by the Quilmes, a Diaguita people. © Fernandopascullo

The Diaguita people are an indigenous group with ancient roots in the Chilean Norte Chico and Argentine Northwest, known for their advanced irrigation systems, distinctive pottery, and resistance to foreign domination. Their history reflects complex cultural development, interactions with larger empires, and eventual conquest by the Spanish.


Origins and Early Culture

The origins of Diaguita culture are traced to the El Molle complex (300–700 CE) in northern Chile. This was followed by the Las Ánimas complex (800–1000 CE), from which the classical Diaguita culture emerged around 1000 CE. By this time, the Diaguitas had developed sophisticated irrigation systems to support agriculture in the semi-arid valleys of the Transverse Range and had perfected a pottery style characterized by black, white, and red geometric designs.


Despite shared cultural traits, the Diaguita people were not politically unified. They were fragmented into chiefdoms, and linguistic diversity suggests that dialects or languages varied between valleys.


Interactions with the Incas

The Inca Empire expanded into Diaguita territories in the late 15th century, likely during the reign of Tupac Inca Yupanqui. The Incas were drawn to the mineral wealth and dense populations of the Eastern Diaguita valleys. However, this expansion was met with resistance, and incorporation into the empire came through warfare, leading to significant depopulation in the Transverse Valleys of Chile’s Norte Chico.


Under Inca rule, the Diaguitas adopted certain cultural elements, including pottery designs from Cuzco, agricultural techniques, and metalworking methods. The Incas also introduced kurakas (local governors) and relocated populations (mitmas) to consolidate control. Despite these changes, the Diaguitas maintained aspects of their distinct identity and did not uniformly accept Inca rule.


Colonial Conquest and Resistance

Spanish conquest began in the mid-16th century, with Chilean Diaguitas subjugated by expeditions from Peru and eastern Diaguita territories invaded by Spanish forces from Chile, the Paraná River, and Peru. The fertile valleys of the eastern Diaguitas, such as the Calchaquí Valley, became the site of fierce resistance in the Calchaquí Wars. The Spanish initially struggled to control these areas, and effective domination only came with the founding of strategic cities like Santiago del Estero (1550s) and Londres (1607).


In Chile, Spanish forces under Governor García Hurtado de Mendoza decimated rebellious Diaguita communities between 1557 and 1561. On the Argentine side, the Calchaquí Diaguitas launched a major uprising in 1630, successfully resisting Spanish forces until their final defeat in 1665.


While the Diaguita language Cacán is now extinct, the group’s cultural impact persists in their pottery, irrigation methods, and oral traditions. Modern Diaguitas, numbering about 155,000 across Chile and Argentina, maintain their identity and traditions. In 2006, the Chilean government officially recognized the Diaguitas as an indigenous people, reflecting their enduring cultural significance.

Incas in Central Chile

1470 Jan 1 - 1530

Aconcagua River, Chile

Incas in Central Chile
Inca Warriors. © Angus McBride.

The brief period of Inca rule in Chile, spanning from the 1470s until the Spanish conquest in the 1530s, marked a significant yet short-lived chapter in the region's history. The Inca presence in Chile was concentrated primarily in the northern and central valleys, such as Aconcagua, Mapocho, and Maipo, where they established settlements like Quillota and implemented their administrative and cultural systems. This period brought profound changes to the local societies, including the Diaguita and Mapuche, but also faced significant resistance that limited the Inca Empire's southern expansion.


Inca Expansion into Chile

The conquest of Central Chile by the Inca Empire likely occurred during the reign of Topa Inca Yupanqui in the late 15th century. Archaeological evidence, such as ceramics, suggests Inca influence as early as the late 14th century, but written chronicles place the primary conquest in the 1470s. The expansion into Chile was likely a gradual process involving both military campaigns and administrative integration.


The primary motivation for the Inca expansion into the Transverse Valleys of Norte Chico and further south was economic. The region's mineral wealth, particularly in gold, was of significant interest. The Incas also sought labor for mining and agricultural projects, which led to the forced relocation of populations, such as the Tomatas, from Diaguita lands to other parts of the empire.


Battle of the Maule and Resistance

The Inca's southern push met its greatest resistance at the Maule River, where the Promaucae (or Picunche), allies of the Mapuche to the south, confronted Inca forces. Chronicler Garcilaso de la Vega recounts that a massive battle took place, lasting several days, with no decisive outcome. This encounter symbolized the limits of Inca expansion, as they failed to subjugate the fiercely independent Mapuche and their allies.


Modern historians, like Osvaldo Silva, have challenged the precise location of this battle and its role in halting the Inca advance. Instead, they emphasize the Mapuche's decentralized social and political structure, which made imposing centralized Inca rule exceedingly difficult.


Diaguita

The Inca conquest of the Diaguita in northern Chile introduced significant cultural and technological influences. The Diaguita adopted Inca pottery designs, agricultural techniques, and methods of metalworking. However, the process was not peaceful, as evidenced by reports of depopulation and rebellion. Some Diaguita groups, such as the Churumatas, were forcibly resettled within the empire to strengthen Inca control.


Incorporation into the empire also left linguistic marks, with Quechua toponyms appearing throughout the region. Despite these influences, the Diaguita retained elements of their distinct cultural identity.


Mapuche

The Mapuche's encounter with the Incas had a lasting impact, shaping their collective identity and military strategies. Though they resisted conquest, the Incas introduced new technologies, including metallurgy, and influenced Mapuche architecture with adobe construction. Loanwords from Quechua entered Mapudungun, though some terms previously attributed to Quechua may have older origins in the Puquina language.


Infrastructure: Roads and Fortresses

To maintain control over their Chilean territories, the Incas developed an extensive road network. Two main north–south routes were constructed: the Longitudinal Andean Inca Road, which ran through the high Andes, and a coastal route, which offered more accessible year-round travel. These roads facilitated troop movements, trade, and communication between Inca settlements.


The road system also connected to Inca fortresses (pukaras) that marked the empire's southern frontier. This frontier comprised an inner core of directly controlled areas and an outer zone of allied or subjugated tribes.


Southern Frontier and Final Reach

The precise southern limit of the Inca Empire in Chile is debated. Traditional accounts place the frontier at the Maule River, but some scholars argue it may have been as far north as the Maipo River. Others suggest Inca troops ventured south to the Bío Bío River and beyond, though this remains unconfirmed.


While the Incas likely influenced areas as far south as Osorno through trade or indirect contact, their political and military control was firmly established only in the regions closer to Santiago.


The Inca presence in Chile, though brief, brought significant transformations to local societies, particularly through their administrative systems, road networks, and cultural exchanges. However, resistance from the Mapuche and other groups limited their expansion and set the stage for the region’s subsequent encounters with Spanish colonization. This era remains a fascinating example of the dynamic interplay between empire and indigenous resistance on the southern edge of the Inca world.

Battle of the Maule

1480 Jan 1

Maule River, Chile

Battle of the Maule
Inca Army on march. © Museo Brüning

The Battle of the Maule stands as a pivotal moment in the history of the Inca Empire's expansion into Chile and its encounter with the fiercely independent Mapuche peoples. While traditionally dated to the reign of Tupac Inca Yupanqui (1471–1493 CE), modern interpretations, particularly those of historian Osvaldo Silva, suggest it may have occurred much later, possibly in the 1530s. This battle underscores both the Mapuche resistance and the limits of Inca imperial ambitions in the region.


Traditional Account by Garcilaso de la Vega

According to Garcilaso de la Vega, the Inca general Sinchiruca led a six-year campaign in Chile, expanding Inca control over the northern regions, including Copiapó, Coquimbo, Aconcagua, and the Maipo Valley near present-day Santiago. After consolidating these territories, Sinchiruca dispatched a force of 20,000 soldiers south to the Maule River, encountering the Picunche people, who resisted Inca advances.


The Picunche called upon their southern allies—the Antalli, Pincu, and Cauqui—to form a coalition. Known collectively to the Incas as Purumaucas (Quechua for "savage enemy"), they refused diplomatic overtures for peace and prepared for battle.


For three days, the Purumaucas and their allies, numbering approximately 18,000–20,000 warriors, clashed with the Inca army in a grueling and evenly matched fight. Both sides suffered heavy losses, and by the fourth day, neither army initiated further attacks. Eventually, the Purumaucas withdrew, claiming victory, having successfully halted the Inca advance.


Revised Interpretation by Osvaldo Silva

Osvaldo Silva challenges this traditional narrative. He argues that the Battle of the Maule did not occur during Tupac Inca Yupanqui's reign but much later, possibly in 1532, as part of a secondary Inca incursion into Mapuche territory. Silva suggests that this battle was not decisive but a retreating action during the Inca army's withdrawal northward.


According to Silva, the Incas had likely fought an earlier battle at the Cachapoal River, which allowed them to push deeper into Mapuche lands. However, upon reaching their farthest point of penetration—possibly near present-day Concepción—the Incas faced intense harassment from Mapuche forces. Their retreat north culminated in a defensive battle at the Maule River, where they resisted another coalition of Mapuche forces.


Significance and Outcomes

The Battle of the Maule highlights key factors that limited the Inca expansion into Mapuche territory:


  • Mapuche Resistance: The Mapuche were decentralized, with strong local leadership, making it difficult for the Incas to impose centralized control. Their commitment to freedom and willingness to fight against a state-level adversary like the Incas set them apart from other conquered groups.
  • Logistical and Political Constraints: The lack of urban centers and surplus resources in southern Chile provided little incentive for the Incas to dedicate significant resources to a prolonged campaign. Compared to the immense effort expended in subduing the Chimú Empire, the Mapuche lands offered fewer material rewards.
  • Geographical Challenges: The rugged terrain and relative isolation of southern Chile further complicated the logistics of sustained Inca campaigns.


Legacy

The Maule River is traditionally regarded as the southern boundary of effective Inca control, though some scholars argue the frontier lay farther north, at the Maipo River. While Inca troops may have reached as far south as Concepción, their presence south of the Maule River was limited to sporadic incursions rather than established rule.


The encounter with the Mapuche was a defining moment for both societies. For the Incas, it revealed the limitations of their empire's reach. For the Mapuche, the confrontation solidified their identity as a fiercely independent people, setting the stage for their later resistance against Spanish colonization.

1520 - 1818
Spanish Exploration & Colonization

Discovery of Chile

1520 Jan 2

Chile

Discovery of Chile
Spanish Conquistadors, 1520-1550. © Angus McBride

The European exploration of Chile began with Ferdinand Magellan's passage through the Strait of Magellan in 1520, marking the first recorded sighting of the region by Europeans. However, the title of "discoverer of Chile" is often attributed to Diego de Almagro, a lieutenant of Francisco Pizarro, whose 1536 expedition ventured into the territory now known as Chile. Almagro’s journey set the stage for subsequent Spanish incursions into the region, although it ended in disappointment and conflict.


Magellan's Early Encounter

Ferdinand Magellan, on his quest to find a westward route to Asia, navigated the strait at the southern tip of South America on November 1, 1520. This initial sighting of Chilean territory was not followed by exploration or settlement, as Magellan's expedition continued toward the Pacific and eventually the Philippines. For several years after, the harsh terrain and perceived lack of resources in the region deterred further European interest.


Diego de Almagro's Expedition (1536)

By the mid-1530s, the conquest of the Inca Empire in Peru had brought wealth and fame to Francisco Pizarro and his associates. Seeking to expand his influence and bolster his own legacy, Diego de Almagro, who governed the southern portion of Peru (Nueva Toledo), organized an expedition to Chile. This arduous journey involved approximately 500 Spaniards and several thousand indigenous allies and laborers.


Almagro’s forces faced extreme challenges as they crossed the Atacama Desert and the Andes, enduring harsh climates, scarcity of food, and resistance from local indigenous groups, including the Mapuche. In March 1536, Almagro’s expedition reached central Chile, but the lack of substantial wealth and the hostility of the local population, highlighted by clashes such as the Battle of Reynogüelén, led him to abandon his ambitions.


Disillusioned, Almagro retreated to Peru, only to be drawn into a civil war with Pizarro. Stripped of his authority, he was captured and executed by Pizarro's forces in 1538, ending his brief role in the history of Chile.


Pedro de Valdivia and the Founding of Santiago

Following Almagro’s failed expedition, interest in Chile waned until Pedro de Valdivia, a captain under Pizarro, saw potential for extending Spanish control southward. In 1540, Valdivia led a smaller and more disciplined force into the Mapocho Valley. After subduing the local Picunche inhabitants, he founded Santiago de Nueva Extremadura (modern-day Santiago) on February 12, 1541, establishing the first enduring European settlement in Chile.


Valdivia’s settlement efforts marked the start of the Spanish colonial foothold in the region, though they faced fierce resistance from the indigenous Mapuche, whose defiance would shape the history of Spanish Chile for centuries.


While European explorers "discovered" Chile from their perspective, indigenous peoples, including the Mapuche, had inhabited the land for thousands of years. This reality complicates the notion of discovery, acknowledging the deep human history that predates European arrival. Almagro’s expedition represents a significant but ultimately fleeting chapter in the Spanish conquest, overshadowed by Valdivia’s later establishment of a more permanent colonial presence.

Conquest of Chile

1541 Jan 1 - 1598

Bío Bío River, Chile

Conquest of Chile
Spanish Conquistador in Chile. © Anonymous

The Conquest of Chile was a pivotal period in Chilean history, spanning from the arrival of Pedro de Valdivia in 1541 to the Battle of Curalaba in 1598 and the subsequent Destruction of the Seven Cities (1598–1604). This era saw Spanish explorers establish settlements and attempt to subdue the indigenous Mapuche, marking the beginning of centuries of resistance and conflict.


Background

At the time of the Spanish arrival, Central Chile had recently been under Inca control, with the Aconcagua Valley as their southernmost stronghold. South of the Inca borders, the Mapuche dominated, a decentralized society spanning from the Itata River to Chiloé Archipelago. They lived in scattered hamlets along rivers and had no state-like organization but were connected through shared culture and a resilient road system. The Mapuche had a long-standing cultural identity and a history of limited interaction with Andean civilizations like Tiwanaku and the Incas.


The Spanish were drawn to Chile by the potential for wealth, especially gold, despite early reports of its relative scarcity compared to Peru. Their expansion was shaped by initial struggles, resistance from indigenous groups, and the challenging geography.


Early Expeditions

The first Spaniards in Chile were part of Diego de Almagro’s expedition in 1535, which failed to find riches and left the region with a poor reputation among the Spanish in Peru. In 1540, Pedro de Valdivia set out with limited resources to conquer Chile, establishing Santiago in 1541 after defeating the Mapuche toqui Michimalonco. However, indigenous resistance was fierce, and Santiago was nearly destroyed in a coordinated attack led by Michimalonco later that year.


Valdivia responded with military campaigns to secure the valleys of Aconcagua, Maipo, and Cachapoal. These victories allowed him to expand south, founding La Serena in 1544 to secure communication with Peru and advancing to Mapuche territories.


Expansion and the Arauco War

From the late 1540s, Valdivia and his successors faced mounting resistance as they pushed into Araucanía, the heartland of the Mapuche. Cities like Concepción, Valdivia, and La Imperial were founded, but Mapuche resistance intensified under leaders such as Caupolicán and Lautaro, who adopted Spanish military tactics, including the use of cavalry.


The Battle of Tucapel in 1553 marked a major turning point when Lautaro’s forces defeated and killed Valdivia. This event spurred the prolonged Arauco War, characterized by guerrilla tactics and intermittent Spanish setbacks.


Colonial Challenges

The Spanish conquest relied heavily on indigenous labor, particularly yanakuna from Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador. They also sought to exploit placer gold deposits, especially in Marga Marga and Villarrica, but resistance from Mapuche laborers disrupted mining efforts. The economy of the colony remained fragile, and the Spanish settlements faced constant threats of attack.


Despite initial successes, the Spanish struggled to maintain control over the southern territories. The challenging terrain, logistical difficulties, and the decentralized nature of the Mapuche society made conquest arduous.


Battle of Curalaba and the End of the Conquest

The Battle of Curalaba in 1598 was a catastrophic defeat for the Spanish. Pelantaru and a force of 300 Mapuche warriors ambushed Governor Martín García Óñez de Loyola and his party, killing the governor and nearly all his men. This victory sparked the Destruction of the Seven Cities, as Mapuche forces systematically destroyed Spanish settlements south of the Bío-Bío River, including Valdivia, Osorno, and Villarrica.


By 1604, the Spanish had abandoned all territory south of the Bío-Bío River, establishing it as the effective frontier of Spanish control. Araucanía remained autonomous, and the Spanish shifted from outright conquest to a strategy of containment, relying on fortifications and sporadic military campaigns.


The Conquest of Chile solidified the enduring resistance of the Mapuche and their ability to thwart Spanish expansion. It highlighted the limitations of Spanish colonial power in regions lacking centralized political structures and significant economic incentives. The Arauco War, which continued for centuries, became a defining feature of colonial Chile, shaping its identity and history.

Arauco War

1541 Jan 1 - 1656

Araucania, Chile

Arauco War
The Arauco War. The painting depicts a woman being kidnapped during a malón. © Johann Moritz Rugendas (1802–1858)

The Arauco War was a prolonged and fiercely contested conflict between the Spanish colonial forces and the Mapuche people in southern Chile. Spanning centuries, the war began with the initial Spanish incursions into Mapuche lands in the mid-16th century and persisted into the 17th century, characterized by alternating periods of intense violence, guerrilla warfare, and uneasy truces.


Origins of the Conflict

The roots of the Arauco War lay in Spanish attempts to establish permanent settlements south of the Bío-Bío River, where the Mapuche fiercely defended their autonomy. The Spanish sought to exploit gold-rich regions, particularly in the Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, and intended to use the Mapuche as a forced labor source. However, unlike Andean societies that were accustomed to systems like the mita, the Mapuche had no tradition of coerced labor and resisted enslavement, sparking sustained hostilities.


The Mapuche had a decentralized society but were united by cultural ties and a common opposition to foreign domination. Spanish conquests in the 1540s, led by Pedro de Valdivia, initially succeeded in establishing cities such as Santiago, Concepción, and La Imperial, but these incursions provoked fierce resistance.


Key Phases of the War


  1. Early Conflicts and Mapuche Resilience (1540–1553): Pedro de Valdivia faced Mapuche leader Michimalonco, who led the Destruction of Santiago in 1541. The Spanish rebuilt and expanded their control but faced guerrilla tactics and periodic uprisings. By 1553, the Mapuche under Caupolicán and Lautaro, who had served with the Spanish cavalry, launched coordinated attacks. Lautaro’s victory at the Battle of Tucapel led to Valdivia’s death, a devastating blow for the Spanish.
  2. Mapuche Rebellions and Spanish Retaliation (1554–1561): Lautaro continued his campaigns, sacking cities like Concepción. His death at the Battle of Mataquito in 1557 marked a turning point, but his strategies inspired continued resistance. Successive Mapuche leaders (toquis) like Caupolicán the Younger adapted Spanish tactics, including cavalry use. Meanwhile, Spanish governors like García Hurtado de Mendoza launched aggressive campaigns, temporarily subduing the Mapuche and establishing new forts, but the cost of occupation remained high.
  3. The Destruction of the Seven Cities (1598–1604): The Battle of Curalaba in 1598, where Governor Martín García Óñez de Loyola was killed, triggered a general Mapuche uprising. Over the next six years, Mapuche forces destroyed all Spanish settlements south of the Bío-Bío River, including Valdivia, Osorno, and Villarrica. This marked the effective end of Spanish attempts to colonize Araucanía, with the Bío-Bío River becoming the de facto frontier.
  4. Defensive War and Jesuit Efforts (1612–1626): In the early 17th century, Jesuits implemented a policy of Defensive War, emphasizing diplomacy and conversion rather than military conquest. However, their efforts were undermined by Mapuche leaders’ resistance to Christian prohibitions on practices like polygamy, which were integral to their social structure.
  5. Mapuche Uprising of 1655: A major rebellion in 1655 pushed the Spanish back to the Maule River. This uprising stemmed from resentment over slavery and Spanish restrictions, including a ban on Mapuche carrying weapons. The rebellion caused significant Spanish losses and reaffirmed Mapuche independence.


Tactics and Outcomes

The Arauco War featured brutal tactics on both sides, including pillaging, ambushes, and the widespread capture of women. Spanish use of enslaved Mapuche labor for gold mining was a central cause of resistance. Over time, Mapuche leaders adopted Spanish military techniques, including the use of horses and firearms, creating a formidable force that challenged Spanish dominance.


Despite periodic victories, the Spanish were never able to fully subdue the Mapuche. The Bío-Bío River became a contested frontier, with the Mapuche maintaining autonomy in Araucanía. Spanish colonization southward largely halted, and a pattern of intermittent warfare persisted for centuries.


The Arauco War, often called the "Indian Flanders" due to its protracted nature, profoundly shaped colonial Chile. It underscored the resilience of the Mapuche and the limits of Spanish imperial power. The conflict also gave rise to literary works such as Alonso de Ercilla’s epic poem, La Araucana, which celebrated Mapuche bravery and tenacity.


The war's impact continued into the modern era, with the Mapuche maintaining a distinct identity and resisting cultural assimilation. The Arauco War remains a symbol of indigenous resistance against colonialism in South America.

Founding of Santiago de Chile

1541 Feb 12

Santiago de Chile, Chile

Founding of Santiago de Chile
The Founding of Santiago (1888). The artwork depicts Pedro de Valdivia and Juan Martín de Candia, proclaiming the founding of the city. © Pedro Lira

The founding of Santiago del Nuevo Extremo on 12 February 1541 by Pedro de Valdivia marked the beginning of Spanish colonization in central Chile and established the foundation for the capital city of modern Chile. Valdivia, sent by Francisco Pizarro from Peru, embarked on a challenging journey from Cusco to the fertile Mapocho Valley, where he sought to establish the capital of his governorship, Nueva Extremadura.


Founding of Santiago

Valdivia and his party arrived in the Mapocho Valley on 13 December 1540, camping near the slopes of Tupahue Hill. The area was inhabited by the Picunche people, with whom Valdivia began negotiations. At a meeting with local chiefs, he outlined his plans to establish a city in the name of Charles V of Spain, intending it to be a central hub for governance and expansion.


On the appointed day, 12 February 1541, Valdivia officially founded Santiago, naming it in honor of Saint James, the patron saint of Spain. The city's design, overseen by Pedro de Gamboa, followed a classic Spanish colonial grid plan. At its center, a Plaza Mayor was designated, surrounded by plots for key buildings such as the cathedral, governor’s house, and jail. The city’s layout included wide streets, adobe-walled houses with tile roofs, and interior courtyards.


Destruction of Santiago

Valdivia left the nascent city to lead campaigns against indigenous resistance in southern Chile, leaving Santiago defended by a small garrison of 55 soldiers under the leadership of Inés de Suárez, a prominent conquistadora. On 11 September 1541, a coalition of Mapuche and Picunche warriors led by Michimalonco attacked the settlement.


Despite fierce resistance, the indigenous forces overwhelmed the defenders, burning much of the city to the ground. In a decisive and brutal act, Suárez ordered the execution of captured indigenous prisoners, displaying their severed heads to demoralize the attackers. This gruesome tactic succeeded in scattering the indigenous forces and saving the remnants of the city.


Rebuilding and Struggles

The destruction of Santiago plunged the settlers into severe hardship. Food shortages were acute, as the Picunche strategy of retreating and halting cultivation cut off agricultural resources. The Spanish were isolated and forced to survive on meager rations, sometimes resorting to eating unconventional sources like sea lions, dogs, and foxes. Supplies from Peru were slow to arrive, further compounding the settlers' struggles.


Reconstruction efforts were gradual. Santiago remained the symbolic center of Spanish governance in Chile, though Concepción gained political prominence with the establishment of the Royal Audiencia there in 1565. It was only in 1607, with the relocation of the Royal Court to Santiago, that the city’s role as the capital of Chile was solidified.


Despite its early struggles, Santiago endured as a crucial foothold for the Spanish in Chile. Its founding marked the start of a prolonged and contentious colonization process, particularly in light of ongoing Mapuche resistance during the Arauco War. The city's early resilience laid the groundwork for its emergence as the heart of Spanish colonial administration and, later, the modern Chilean state.

Battle of Tucapel

1553 Dec 25

Tucapel, Chile

Battle of Tucapel
Lautaro. © Pedro Subercaseaux

The Battle of Tucapel, fought on December 25, 1553, marked a pivotal moment in the early stages of the Arauco War, a protracted conflict between the Spanish conquistadors and the Mapuche people in southern Chile. The confrontation not only resulted in the death of Pedro de Valdivia, the Spanish governor and founder of Santiago, but also underscored the resilience and strategic acumen of the Mapuche under their young leader, Lautaro.


Background

By the early 1550s, Pedro de Valdivia had solidified Spanish control over much of central Chile through the founding of cities and the establishment of forts. However, his rapid expansion relied on dispersing his limited forces, leaving Spanish settlements vulnerable to attacks. Among Valdivia’s captives was Lautaro, a young Mapuche who had served as his groom. During his time with the Spanish, Lautaro learned their military tactics, including cavalry warfare. Armed with this knowledge, Lautaro eventually returned to his people, where he used his insights to organize and train Mapuche warriors to resist the Spanish invasion.


As tensions escalated, Lautaro led a series of strategic maneuvers to trap Valdivia. Meanwhile, Valdivia, unaware of the brewing revolt, embarked on an inspection of the forts in southern Chile. With only 50 soldiers, he traveled to Tucapel, a fort previously destroyed by Lautaro’s forces, unaware of the ambush that awaited him.


The Battle

On Christmas Day, Valdivia arrived at the ruins of Tucapel, expecting reinforcements from nearby forts. Instead, he found the area eerily silent. As his forces began to camp, Mapuche warriors, hidden in the surrounding forest, launched a sudden and ferocious attack.


The battle unfolded in waves. Valdivia’s men repelled the initial assault and even mounted a counterattack, but the Mapuche were well-prepared. Using ropes and maces, they dismounted the Spanish cavalry and dragged soldiers from the battlefield. Successive waves of Mapuche warriors, directed by Lautaro, exhausted the Spanish forces, which suffered heavy casualties. Despite his experience as a commander, Valdivia could not overcome the superior numbers and persistence of the Mapuche.


When it became clear that the battle was lost, Valdivia attempted to retreat but was captured along with a priest, Francisco de Pozo. The remaining Spanish soldiers were killed.


Valdivia's Death

Accounts of Valdivia’s death vary. According to some reports, the toqui Caupolicán ordered his execution by lance. Others, such as chronicler Alonso de Góngora Marmolejo, claim Valdivia was tortured, with his arms cut off and eaten by the Mapuche before he was killed. A third version suggests Valdivia was offered the chance to spare his life by promising to evacuate Spanish settlements, but he was ultimately executed by a warrior named Pilmaiquén. A more gruesome legend describes molten gold being poured down Valdivia’s throat, symbolizing his insatiable greed.


Aftermath

The victory at Tucapel emboldened the Mapuche. Caupolicán capitalized on the momentum by besieging other Spanish settlements, while Lautaro moved to monitor and threaten the strategic city of Concepción. The Spanish colony in Chile was thrown into chaos, with disputes over the succession of the governorship. The defeat at Tucapel forced the Spanish to confront the reality of Mapuche resistance, a struggle that would continue for centuries.

Calchaqui Wars

1560 Jan 1 - 1667

Salta, Salta Province, Argenti

Calchaqui Wars
Calchaqui Wars © Anonymous

The Calchaquí Wars (1560–1667) were a prolonged and intense conflict between the indigenous Diaguita Confederation and the Spanish Empire, unfolding over a century in the Argentine Northwest. The wars, driven by resistance to Spanish colonization and the imposition of the encomienda system, were centered in present-day Jujuy, Salta, Tucumán, Catamarca, and La Rioja provinces. The First Calchaquí War (1559–1562) marked the beginning of this sustained resistance.


Origins of the First War

In 1559, Spanish governor Juan Pérez de Zurita founded several settlements, including Córdoba de Calchaquí, with the expectation that local Diaguita communities would submit to Spanish authority and labor exploitation under the encomienda system. This system, which effectively enslaved indigenous populations to provide labor and tribute, faced immediate resistance from the fiercely independent Diaguita people.


A critical figure in this resistance was Juan Calchaquí, a curaca (tribal leader) who initially engaged diplomatically with the Spanish, even undergoing baptism as part of a negotiation led by Zurita. However, upon recognizing the exploitative nature of Spanish demands, Juan Calchaquí organized a rebellion against colonial forces. This marked the beginning of widespread indigenous uprisings.


Indigenous Rebellion

Under Juan Calchaquí's leadership, the Diaguitas launched coordinated attacks on Spanish settlements. The cities founded by Zurita-Córdoba de Calchaquí, Londres (present-day Catamarca Province), and Cañete-were all systematically overrun and destroyed. The rebellion spread beyond the Calchaquí Valley as other indigenous groups, such as the Omaguacas, joined the resistance. They successfully destroyed the city of Nieva (modern San Salvador de Jujuy) and forced the Spanish to retreat.


Faced with united indigenous resistance, the Spanish population in the region was driven to consolidate in Santiago del Estero, a safer stronghold further east. This dramatic setback disrupted Spanish expansion in the northwest and highlighted the resilience and organizational capabilities of the Diaguita Confederation.


Aftermath of the First War

The Spanish losses during the First Calchaquí War were substantial. The destruction of key settlements and the concentration of Spanish forces in Santiago del Estero represented a severe blow to the colonial project in the region. Spanish chroniclers, favoring the colonial perspective, described the war as "one of the worst tragedies of our history," underscoring its significance in halting Spanish progress in the area.


The First Calchaquí War set the tone for continued resistance in the following decades, as the Diaguita Confederation repeatedly defied Spanish attempts at conquest. Their determined resistance left a lasting legacy in the history of indigenous struggles against colonial oppression in South America.

Battle of Curalaba

1598 Dec 21

Angol, Chile

Battle of Curalaba
Battle of Curalaba © Anonymous

The Battle of Curalaba, fought on December 21, 1598, near the Curalaba River in southern Chile, was a defining moment in the history of Colonial Chile. Led by Pelantaru, a Mapuche leader, this decisive victory against the Spanish forces commanded by Governor Martín García Óñez de Loyola marked a turning point in the Arauco War and led to the collapse of Spanish control over much of southern Chile.


Background

By the late 16th century, Spanish efforts to subdue the Mapuche south of the Bío-Bío River had stalled. While the initial phase of conquest in Chile (1530s–1550s) saw rapid expansion, resistance from the Mapuche, coupled with logistical difficulties and harsh terrain, had halted Spanish advances. This resistance had already forced the Spaniards to adapt to a protracted conflict, known as the Arauco War, characterized by periodic uprisings and guerrilla tactics by the Mapuche.


Despite these challenges, the Spanish remained overconfident in their military superiority. Governor Martín García Óñez de Loyola sought to assert Spanish dominance by expanding control deeper into Mapuche territory, leading to his fateful journey in late 1598.


Ambush

On December 21, 1598, Loyola and his party of approximately 50 soldiers and companions camped at Curalaba, near the heart of Mapuche territory. They failed to take adequate defensive measures, despite the known hostility in the region. Mapuche leaders Pelantaru, along with Anganamón and Guaiquimilla, had been tracking the Spanish group with a force of 300 warriors, most of whom were on horseback.


That night, the Mapuche launched a surprise raid on the unsuspecting Spanish camp. The attack was swift and devastating. The Spaniards, caught off guard, were overwhelmed, and Governor Loyola was killed along with nearly all his men. The disaster at Curalaba not only resulted in the loss of a Spanish governor but also symbolized the vulnerability of the Spanish forces.


Aftermath: The Destruction of the Seven Cities

The victory at Curalaba inspired a widespread Mapuche uprising, orchestrated by the toqui Paillamachu. In the years following the battle, Mapuche forces systematically attacked and destroyed Spanish settlements south of the Bío-Bío River. This series of attacks, known as the Destruction of the Seven Cities, led to the abandonment or destruction of Spanish towns, including Angol, Imperial, Valdivia, Osorno, Villarrica, Santa Cruz de Oñez, and Arauco. Spanish colonists fled northward, leaving the territory south of the Bío-Bío firmly under Mapuche control.


Impact on Colonial Chile

The Disaster of Curalaba forced the Spanish Crown to reassess its approach to warfare and governance in Chile. The Mapuche resistance demonstrated the limits of Spanish power and the resilience of indigenous societies. Colonial authorities shifted from offensive campaigns to a strategy of containment, establishing the Bío-Bío River as the de facto frontier between Spanish-controlled Chile and Mapuche lands.


The battle also marked the end of the Spanish conquest period in Chile. From this point onward, the colony of Chile became defined by its struggle to coexist with the autonomous Mapuche territory, setting the stage for centuries of intermittent conflict and negotiation. The legacy of the Battle of Curalaba endures as a symbol of Mapuche resistance and resilience against colonial oppression.

Destruction of the Seven Cities

1598 Dec 23 - 1604

Valdivia, Chile

Destruction of the Seven Cities
The remaining Spanish population withdrew to Central Chile, which became the economic and political heart of the colony. © Anonymous

The Destruction of the Seven Cities stands as one of the most transformative events in Chilean colonial history. It unfolded in the wake of the Battle of Curalaba on December 23, 1598, when the Mapuche leader Pelantaru and his warriors ambushed and killed Spanish Governor Martín García Óñez de Loyola and nearly his entire party. News of this decisive victory spread quickly among the Mapuche and Huilliche, igniting a massive uprising that forever altered the balance of power in the region.


The rebellion targeted the Spanish outposts south of the Bío-Bío River, which had long been vulnerable to Mapuche resistance. In a coordinated campaign lasting several years, the Mapuche and their allies destroyed or forced the abandonment of seven key settlements: Santa Cruz de Coya, Valdivia, Los Infantes, La Imperial, Villa Rica, Osorno, and Araucan. By 1604, these cities were in ruins, their Spanish inhabitants either killed or driven away. Contemporary accounts, such as those of Alonso González de Nájera, described the scale of the devastation, estimating over 3,000 Spaniards killed and hundreds of women and children taken captive. Many captives, particularly women, were absorbed into Mapuche society, contributing to a new generation of mestizos who would bolster Mapuche communities ravaged by disease and war.


The collapse of Spanish control south of the Bío-Bío River reshaped colonial Chile. The remaining Spanish population withdrew to Central Chile, which became the economic and political heart of the colony. Settlements in the region grew, while forests were cleared for agriculture, transforming the landscape. The Bío-Bío River became a permanent frontier, separating Spanish-held territories from Mapuche lands. Concepción rose to prominence as the military capital, serving as the base for the Army of Arauco, which was financed by silver from Peru through the Real Situado. Santiago retained its status as the political capital, but the south was no longer a focus of colonial expansion.


In the south, the destruction of cities like Valdivia led to a strategic vacuum that attracted foreign interest. The Dutch briefly occupied Valdivia in 1643, recognizing its potential as a base of operations. The Spanish, understanding its importance, reoccupied and fortified the city in 1644, transforming it into a vital outpost. Further south, refugees from the destroyed cities sought safety in the Chiloé Archipelago, establishing settlements like Calbuco and Carelmapu, which became isolated and heavily reliant on indigenous militias for defense.


For the Mapuche, the uprising was a monumental victory that reasserted their sovereignty and ensured the survival of their culture. The destruction of the Spanish cities marked the end of the conquest period in Chile and forced the Spanish to abandon their ambitions of subjugating the Mapuche. It established a precarious peace defined by parliaments and truces, but the legacy of this conflict endured, shaping relations between the Spanish and Mapuche for centuries.


This event, remembered in Chilean historiography as the Destruction of the Seven Cities, underscored the resilience and determination of the Mapuche to defend their land. It signified the beginning of a new chapter in colonial Chile, defined not by expansion but by coexistence along a contested frontier.

Kingdom of Chile

1789 Jan 1

Chile

Kingdom of Chile
In 1789, Chile was officially elevated to the status of a Captaincy General, granting it greater autonomy and military authority under a Bourbon-style system. © Anonymous

The Bourbon Reforms implemented by Charles III of Spain in the late 18th century significantly reshaped the administrative boundaries and governance of Spanish colonies in South America, including Chile. These reforms, aimed at modernizing and centralizing colonial administration to improve economic efficiency and military defense, had a lasting impact on the territorial configuration and political structure of Chile.


Map of the Kingdom of Chile in 1775. © Janitoalevic

Map of the Kingdom of Chile in 1775. © Janitoalevic


In 1776, the newly created Viceroyalty of the Río de la Plata absorbed territories historically linked to Chile. The provinces of Mendoza and San Juan, part of the province of Cuyo, were transferred from Chile's jurisdiction to the Río de la Plata. This change reflected the Bourbon emphasis on reorganizing colonial territories to align with economic and logistical priorities, as the Río de la Plata was emerging as a key center of trade and administrative control.


Despite this territorial loss, Chile underwent administrative modernization under the Bourbon system. In 1786, two intendancies—Santiago and Concepción—were established, introducing a more centralized and streamlined governance model. These intendancies functioned under the principles of the Bourbon reforms, with intendants appointed to oversee local governance, tax collection, and military matters.


In 1789, Chile was officially elevated to the status of a Captaincy General or Kingdom of Chile, granting it greater autonomy and military authority under a Bourbon-style system. This new designation recognized Chile's strategic importance as a frontier colony facing the Pacific Ocean and its challenges in dealing with persistent indigenous resistance in the southern regions. The Captaincy General structure allowed for a more effective response to local defense needs while maintaining the overarching authority of the Spanish Crown.


The Bourbon reforms in Chile were part of a broader transformation across Spanish America, reflecting the Crown's attempts to adapt its colonial administration to the demands of a changing geopolitical and economic landscape. These changes laid the groundwork for the evolving political and social dynamics that would later influence Chile's path toward independence.

1810 - 1879
Independence and Republican Era

Chilean War of Independence

1812 Jan 1 - 1827

Chile

Chilean War of Independence
Charge of Colonel Santiago Bueras during the battle. © Pedro León Carmona (1853-1899)

Video

The Chilean War of Independence began in the shadows of global upheaval. In 1808, Napoleon's invasion of Spain shattered the Spanish monarchy, leaving colonies like Chile adrift in a political void. This upheaval reverberated across the Spanish Empire, leaving its colonies without clear leadership. In Chile, a modest and remote captaincy, the death of Governor Luis Muñoz de Guzmán left the colony in the hands of Francisco García Carrasco, whose authoritarian and corrupt governance alienated the criollo elites. As news of Spain’s collapse spread, tensions in Chile grew.


In 1810, inspired by the May Revolution in Buenos Aires, the criollo elites pushed for self-rule. On September 18, Governor Mateo de Toro Zambrano, an elderly interim leader, ceded power to the First National Junta. Though initially loyal to Ferdinand VII, this marked the first step toward independence. The period, later called Patria Vieja, saw political factions emerge, from cautious moderates to radicals advocating full independence. Figures like José Miguel arrera and Juan Martínez de Rozas vied for influence, setting the stage for internal conflict.


The Reconquista: Spanish Retaliation and Suppression

Spain, determined to reclaim its rebellious colonies, launched a counteroffensive in 1814. Royalist forces crushed the independence movement at the Battle of Rancagua, forcing leaders such as Bernardo O’Higgins into exile in Argentina. This defeat ushered in the Reconquista, a grim era of Spanish dominance marked by executions, exiles, and the dismantling of local autonomy. Yet, rather than pacify the population, the harsh reprisals only deepened support for independence.


In Argentina, O’Higgins allied with José de San Martín, whose vision for liberation extended beyond Chile to Peru. Together, they prepared a bold plan to cross the Andes and reclaim Chile.


Patria Nueva: Victory and Independence

In February 1817, the Army of the Andes, led by San Martín and O’Higgins, emerged from a perilous mountain crossing to confront the royalists at the Battle of Chacabuco. Their decisive victory reopened the road to Santiago, where O’Higgins was named Supreme Director. The following year, on February 12, 1818, Chile formally declared independence.


Spanish forces made a final attempt to retake Santiago but were decisively defeated by San Martín at the Battle of Maipú on April 5, 1818. This victory secured the liberation of central Chile, though fighting continued in the south against royalist holdouts and indigenous groups until 1826.


Economic Strain and the Legacy of Independence

The war left Chile economically battered. Trade disruptions and pillaging armies devastated the countryside, while independence debts burdened the fledgling republic for decades. Yet, Chile’s embrace of free trade in 1811 and its strategic position allowed it to thrive in the mid-19th century, capitalizing on global markets during events like the California Gold Rush.


The struggle for independence was not merely a war against Spain but a civil war among Chileans, divided between loyalty to the Crown and the desire for self-rule. By the war’s end, Chile had not only achieved independence but laid the foundation for a new republic, emerging as a resilient and ambitious nation in South America.

Battle of Chacabuco

1817 Feb 12

Chacabuco, Chile

Battle of Chacabuco
Chilean and Argentinean troops going to the Battle of Chacabuco (February 12, 1817) led by José de San Martín. © Pedro Subercaseaux (1880–1956)

Video

On February 12, 1817, the Battle of Chacabuco became a defining moment in Chile's fight for independence. General José de San Martín’s Army of the Andes, in alliance with Chilean patriot Bernardo O’Higgins, achieved a decisive victory over Spanish royalist forces commanded by Rafael Maroto. This triumph set the stage for the liberation of Chile and cemented the battle's legacy in the larger context of South America's independence movements.


Background

By 1814, following the reconquest of Chile by royalist forces, independence leaders like Bernardo O’Higgins and José Miguel Carrera had fled to Argentina. There, they joined forces with General José de San Martín, who envisioned liberating Chile as a stepping stone to freeing Peru, the stronghold of Spanish colonial power. San Martín meticulously prepared the Army of the Andes, consisting of 6,000 men, 1,200 horses, and 22 cannons, to cross the treacherous Andes Mountains into Chile.


The crossing, completed in January 1817, was a feat of strategic brilliance and endurance. San Martín’s misdirection tactics left royalist forces unprepared, but the journey exacted a heavy toll—one-third of the army and more than half of the horses were lost. Despite these setbacks, the patriot forces regrouped and pressed forward. Meanwhile, the royalists, led by Rafael Maroto, prepared to defend Santiago from the advancing patriots.


The Battle

San Martín divided his forces into two contingents: O’Higgins led the left flank, and General Miguel Estanislao Soler commanded the right. Their objective was to encircle the royalists at Chacabuco, cutting off escape routes and attacking simultaneously. However, delays in Soler’s advance forced O’Higgins to abandon the original plan. Overcome with emotion at the sight of his homeland, O’Higgins charged prematurely, engaging the royalists head-on.


The battle turned chaotic but decisive. San Martín ordered Soler to flank the royalist forces, relieving pressure on O’Higgins’ men. As Soler captured a key artillery position, the royalists’ defenses began to crumble. Encircled and outnumbered, the royalist forces retreated to the Chacabuco Ranch, where they made a desperate last stand. Hand-to-hand combat ensued until the patriot forces secured victory. Approximately 500 royalists were killed, 600 captured, and their remaining forces scattered. The patriots suffered relatively light casualties—12 men killed in battle, though an additional 120 later died from injuries.


Aftermath

The victory at Chacabuco was transformative. Santiago was reclaimed, and the royalist government was effectively dismantled. San Martín, hailed as a hero, declined political power and insisted on the appointment of Bernardo O’Higgins as Supreme Director of Chile. This marked the beginning of the Patria Nueva, a period of renewed efforts to consolidate Chilean independence


The royalists, though defeated, retreated to southern Chile, where they maintained a foothold until their final expulsion in 1826. The Battle of Chacabuco also emboldened independence movements across South America, reinforcing San Martín’s vision of a liberated continent.


The Battle of Chacabuco was more than a military victory; it was a symbol of resilience and unity in the face of colonial oppression. It solidified San Martín’s and O’Higgins’ leadership, inspired further liberation efforts, and paved the way for the decisive Battle of Maipú the following year. Ultimately, Chacabuco marked the turning point in Chile’s journey toward independence, a critical chapter in the broader narrative of South America’s struggle for freedom.

Chilean Declaration of Independence

1818 Feb 12

Talca, Chile

Chilean Declaration of Independence
Proclamación y jura de la Independencia de Chile. © Pedro Subercaseaux (1880–1956)

The Formal Ceremony of Chilean Independence: 12 February 1818

The Chilean Declaration of Independence culminated in a grand celebration on 12 February 1818, marking the first anniversary of the Battle of Chacabuco, a pivotal victory in the Chilean War of Independence. The event, meticulously planned and widely celebrated, reflected the triumph of the Patriot forces and the establishment of a sovereign Chile.


Preparations and Proclamation in Santiago

On 9 February, Luis de la Cruz announced the program for the independence festivities in Santiago. Activities commenced on the afternoon of 11 February with cannon fire from Cerro Santa Lucía, setting a solemn and celebratory tone.


The following morning, 12 February, a grand stage was erected in front of the Plaza de Armas in Santiago, where the city's leading authorities and citizens gathered. The ceremony began with a speech by José Gregorio Argomedo, representing the government. Miguel Zañartu, the Minister of the Interior, then read the official Act of Independence, affirming Chile’s freedom from Spanish rule.


After the reading, José Ignacio Cienfuegos, administrator of the Santiago Diocese, swore an oath with the added solemn phrase: _“Y así juro porque creo en mi conciencia que ésta es la voluntad del Eterno”_ (“And so I swear on my conscience that this is the will of the Eternal”). General José de San Martín, along with Zañartu and other officials, followed with their oaths. Finally, Mayor Francisco de Borja Fontecilla swore the oath to the people, completing the formalities.


Festivities in Santiago

The celebrations continued with a Te Deum sung at the Santiago Cathedral on 13 February, followed by a thanksgiving Mass the next day. A speech by Tomás Guido, representing Buenos Aires, congratulated the Chilean people on their independence. Public celebrations lasted until 16 February, with widespread dissemination of the declaration and supporting manifestos penned by Bernardo Vera.


Proclamation in Talca and Other Cities

In Talca, Bernardo O’Higgins presided over the swearing-in of the Independent Southern Army. The event included ceremonial gunfire, a Mass, and public festivities. Similarly, independence was declared in towns across Chile, each hosting local celebrations. In La Serena, the festivities stretched from 27 February to 1 March, while Copiapó celebrated between 27 and 28 March.


Later Proclamations

The oath of independence continued to be sworn in regions still under Spanish control. On 15 June 1820, the coastal city of Valdivia was incorporated into the Chilean nation following Thomas Cochrane’s daring naval capture. The final declaration came on 22 January 1826, in San Carlos, Chiloé, after the Treaty of Tantauco ended Spanish rule in the Chiloé Archipelago.


The formal declaration of independence on 12 February 1818 marked Chile’s transformation into a sovereign state. The ceremonies symbolized unity and resolve, with widespread celebrations echoing the newfound liberty. While challenges remained, including securing territories like Chiloé and Valdivia, the day solidified Chile’s place as a free and independent nation.

Battle of Maipu: Securing Chilean Independence

1818 Apr 5

Maipú, Maipu, Chile

Battle of Maipu: Securing Chilean Independence
The "Embrace of Maipú" between José de San Martín y Bernardo O'Higgins after the victory in the Battle of Maipú, April 5th, 1818. © Pedro Subercaseaux (1880–1956)

On April 5, 1818, the Battle of Maipú marked the decisive end of Spanish control over central Chile. Fought near Santiago, it pitted the patriot forces of General José de San Martín and Bernardo O’Higgins against the Spanish royalist army under General Mariano Osorio. This victory solidified Chile's independence and laid the groundwork for the liberation of Peru.


Background: From Defeat to Redemption

Following their defeat at the Second Battle of Cancha Rayada, the patriot forces appeared fractured. However, under San Martín’s leadership and O’Higgins' organizational efforts, the army swiftly regrouped. In just days, they rallied 5,000 troops, restored their structure, and fortified their resolve to prevent Spanish forces from capturing Santiago.


The royalists, emboldened by their earlier victory, pursued the patriots relentlessly. Yet, the pursuit slowed as they encountered resistance from local populations, giving the patriots time to recover. By early April, both armies prepared for a decisive encounter south of Santiago.


Battle Preparations

The night before the battle, the Spanish forces encamped at Lo Espejo, while San Martín positioned his men strategically along the nearby ridges of Maipú. San Martín's forces were organized into three infantry divisions, supported by cavalry on both flanks and artillery at key points. The Spanish troops, meanwhile, formed a defensive triangular ridge with divisions strategically placed to protect key positions.


The Battle: A Decisive Engagement

The battle began around 11:30 AM with a brief but ineffective artillery exchange. San Martín then ordered an infantry advance, with Generals Las Heras and Alvarado leading assaults on the Spanish flanks. Fierce fighting erupted as patriot forces pushed against the royalist lines.


On the right, Colonel Zapiola's grenadiers countered a Spanish cavalry charge, chasing them into a deadly ambush of patriot artillery and infantry fire. On the left, Colonel Ramón Freire’s Cazadores cavalry routed the Spanish cavalry, securing the flank. In the center, San Martín reinforced the patriot line with battalions from Los Andes, which overwhelmed the Spanish Burgos and Arequipa battalions.


Despite Ordóñez’s attempts to rally his men, the Spanish line crumbled. Osorio, abandoning his troops, fled the battlefield, leaving Ordóñez to organize a desperate final stand at Lo Espejo. Patriot artillery under Blanco Encalada and Borgoño bombarded the Spanish position, forcing their surrender after intense combat.


Outcome and Legacy

The battle was a devastating defeat for the Spanish forces, with 1,500 killed and 2,289 captured. The patriots suffered significant losses—800 dead and 1,000 wounded—but emerged victorious. This triumph ended major Spanish military operations in Chile and freed the patriot forces to focus on liberating Peru, the heart of Spanish colonial power in South America.


The "Embrace of Maipú" between San Martín and O’Higgins symbolized the unity of their cause and the consolidation of Chilean independence. The victory at Maipú not only secured the independence of Chile’s core territories but also reinforced the broader continental liberation movement, paving the way for future campaigns that would ultimately dismantle Spanish rule in the Americas.

Early Republic of Chile: Tumultuous Early Years
Chilean patriots. © Johann Moritz Rugendas (1802–1858)

Bernardo O’Higgins: The Supreme Director (1817–1823)

Bernardo O’Higgins stood at the helm of a fledgling Chilean republic, celebrated as a liberator and nation-builder. His victories over the royalists and his push to modernize Chile, from founding schools to attempting land reforms, earned him both praise and condemnation. His anticlerical stance, which aimed to reduce the political influence of the Catholic Church and promote religious tolerance, clashed with conservative values. Similarly, his efforts to abolish noble titles and reform land tenure provoked the ire of the aristocracy.


O’Higgins’s decision to support San Martín’s liberation campaign in Peru was a strategic move to secure Chile’s independence, yet it drained the country’s resources. His authoritarian tendencies, combined with growing opposition from liberals, conservatives, and regional leaders, culminated in his forced resignation in 1823. Embittered, O’Higgins left Chile for exile in Peru, where he died in 1842.


Civil Turmoil and the Struggle for Stability (1823–1830)

O’Higgins’s departure did not bring peace to Chile. Instead, the nation plunged into years of political chaos, defined by clashes between the Pipiolos (liberals) and Pelucones (conservatives). Liberal leaders like Ramón Freire rose to power but struggled to maintain control in a deeply divided society. The abolition of slavery in 1823 was one of the Pipiolos' most enduring achievements, but their federalist experiments failed to unify the country.


In 1828, Chile adopted a moderately liberal constitution, establishing a unitary government with separate executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Yet this alienated both federalists and conservatives, deepening political divisions. The aristocracy, angered by the abolition of primogeniture estates, added their discontent to the growing unrest.


The Conservative Takeover

The instability of the 1820s culminated in the Battle of Lircay on April 17, 1830. The conservatives, led by the Pelucones, decisively defeated the liberal forces. Freire, like O’Higgins, went into exile, and the conservatives seized control of Chile’s government. Their victory marked the end of the liberal experiment and the beginning of a more centralized and stable governance under conservative leadership.


Legacy of a Tumultuous Era

The years between 1817 and 1830 laid the foundations of Chile’s republic, but they were fraught with conflict and competing visions for the country’s future. O’Higgins’s reforms, though controversial, set a precedent for modernization, while the liberals’ abolition of slavery showcased Chile’s progressive potential. However, the bloodshed and instability of the period underscored the challenges of nation-building, leaving Chile to consolidate its identity under conservative rule.

Chilean Civil War of 1829–1830

1829 Jan 1 - 1830

Chile

Chilean Civil War of 1829–1830
More details Mariano Egaña, was a notable Pelucón; politically he felt affinity to constitutional monarchy as a form of government. © Raymond Monvoisin (1794–1870)

The Chilean Civil War of 1829–1830 was a pivotal conflict in Chile's early post-independence history, pitting the Conservative Pelucones against the Liberal Pipiolos. Emerging from long-standing disputes over the nation's constitutional and political structure, the war ended with the Conservatives' decisive victory and the establishment of a lasting constitutional framework.


Background

After General Bernardo O'Higgins' resignation and exile in 1823, Chile's political scene became tumultuous. Power struggles centered on anticlericalism, regionalism, and governance style. Two dominant factions crystallized: the Conservatives, drawn from the colonial aristocracy and advocating strong central government and Church support, and the Liberals, influenced by European Enlightenment ideals, seeking democratic reforms and reduced Church influence.


During the 1820s, constitutional experiments sought to address these ideological divides. The 1823 Constitution created a centralized system but was short-lived. A federalist attempt in 1826 under José Miguel Infante granted regional assemblies power but failed to stabilize the country. The 1828 Constitution, with its liberal framework and separation of powers, alienated both federalists and conservatives, further heightening tensions.


The Spark: Election of 1829

The presidential election of 1829 brought the conflict to a head. Liberal Francisco Antonio Pinto was elected president, but disputes over the vice presidency led to a constitutional crisis. Congress, dominated by Liberals, bypassed leading conservative candidates and selected Joaquín Vicuña, brother of the Senate president. Conservatives, viewing this as an affront, rallied behind General José Joaquín Prieto, setting the stage for civil war.


Initial Clashes

President Pinto resigned in mid-1829, and a power vacuum ensued. The Liberal Senate president, Francisco Ramón Vicuña, assumed the presidency, further deepening divisions. Conservative forces under Prieto, supported by Manuel Bulnes, moved toward Santiago, defeating Liberal forces led by Francisco de la Lastra at the Battle of Ochagavía in December 1829.


With the government in disarray, a temporary junta led by José Tomás Ovalle sought to mediate, but tensions persisted. Both sides convened separate conventions, escalating the conflict. Francisco Ruiz-Tagle briefly assumed the presidency in early 1830 but resigned under pressure, leaving Ovalle to continue as acting president.


Battle of Lircay

The decisive Battle of Lircay on April 17, 1830, near Talca, marked the war's climax. Conservative forces routed the Liberals, forcing their leader, Ramón Freire, into exile. Freire, once Chile's president and a prominent Liberal figure, retired from politics after his defeat.


Aftermath and Legacy

Following the Conservative victory, Diego Portales emerged as the principal architect of Chile's political future. Appointed as a minister, Portales implemented policies that shaped the country's governance for decades. The Treaty of Cuz-Cuz ended hostilities, consolidating Conservative dominance and initiating a 30-year period of stability under their rule.


The war also led to the drafting of the 1833 Constitution, a conservative document that centralized power, strengthened the executive branch, and provided the framework for Chile's political system until 1925. The conflict symbolized the nation's struggle to balance liberal aspirations with conservative values, a theme that would resonate throughout Chile's history.

Conservative Era: Modernization of Chile
Fiestas Patrias of Chile, 1854. © Gay, Claudio, 1800-1873

Diego Portales was a transformative figure in Chilean history, shaping the nation’s political and institutional framework during the early republic. Despite never holding the presidency, his influence as a statesman from 1830 to 1837 established a centralized and enduring system of governance, often referred to as the "Portalian State."


The Portalian Era

Portales championed an autocratic republic, centralizing power in the national government and the presidency. His policies secured the support of key sectors, including merchants, large landowners, the Church, the military, and foreign investors. A pragmatist, Portales valued the Catholic Church not for personal faith—he was agnostic—but for its role as a pillar of societal stability and legitimacy. He repealed earlier liberal reforms that had threatened Church privileges, consolidating its role in the state.


The Chilean Constitution of 1833, institutionalizing Portales' vision, became one of the most durable constitutions in Latin America, lasting until 1925. It granted expansive powers to the president, including appointing provincial officials and serving two consecutive five-year terms, with the ability to influence the selection of a successor. The constitution also entrenched Catholicism as the state religion and created an independent judiciary. Although it maintained the guise of republicanism, the system was authoritarian, ensuring centralized control and long-term stability.


Portales did not shy away from using dictatorial methods, including press censorship and electoral manipulation, to achieve his goals. These tactics, combined with domestic stability and infrastructure developments such as ports, railroads, and telegraphs, positioned Chile for economic modernization during this period.


Joaquín Prieto's Presidency (1831–1841)

As president, General Joaquín Prieto implemented the 1833 constitution under Portales' guidance. His administration's successes included stabilizing government finances, consolidating central authority, and addressing external threats. Prieto and Portales were particularly wary of Bolivian General Andrés de Santa Cruz, who formed the Peru-Bolivia Confederation in 1836. Fearing the Confederation's expansionist ambitions, Chile declared war under Portales' leadership.


Portales, however, was assassinated by conspirators in 1837, a turning point that intensified Chile's resolve. The war culminated in Chile's victory under General Manuel Bulnes at the Battle of Yungay in 1839, dismantling the Confederation and securing Chile’s regional dominance along the Pacific.


Manuel Bulnes' Presidency (1841–1851)

After the war, Manuel Bulnes was elected president and continued consolidating Chile’s territory and institutions. His administration focused on occupying southern regions, including the Araucanía and Strait of Magellan, while fostering intellectual development. Venezuelan scholar Andrés Bello helped establish the University of Santiago, advancing Chilean education and legal scholarship.


However, tensions between conservatives and liberals led to the Chilean Civil War of 1851, sparked by a failed liberal rebellion. Bulnes' conservative government emerged victorious, but the divisions foreshadowed a shift in Chilean politics.


Manuel Montt and the Liberal Turn (1851–1861)

The last conservative president, Manuel Montt, faced increasing unrest during his two terms. His administration struggled with political dissent, culminating in the Liberal Rebellion of 1859. By the end of his presidency, the liberal faction had gained enough influence to secure the election of José Joaquín Pérez in 1861, marking the end of conservative dominance and the beginning of a new political era in Chile.


Legacy of the Portalian State

The Portalian State laid the foundation for Chile’s political stability in the 19th century, balancing authoritarian governance with economic modernization. While the system fostered growth and stability, it also suppressed political dissent and entrenched inequality, setting the stage for future liberal reforms and conflicts.

War of the Confederation

1836 Jan 1 - 1839

Peru

War of the Confederation
The Peruviana sails under Chilean flag after her capture in Callao by the Aquiles. © Álvaro Casanova Zenteno

The War of the Confederation (1836–1839) was a pivotal conflict in South American history, pitting the Peru-Bolivian Confederation under General Andrés de Santa Cruz against an alliance of Chile and the Argentine Confederation. Sparked by geopolitical, economic, and regional rivalries, the war ended with the dissolution of the Confederation, reshaping the balance of power in the region and consolidating Chile's and Peru's national identities.


Background and Formation of the Confederation

In 1836, Santa Cruz united Peru and Bolivia into the Peru-Bolivian Confederation, alarming neighboring Chile and Argentina. Chile feared the Confederation’s potential dominance over Pacific trade routes, especially given its longstanding rivalry with Peru over the ports of Callao and Valparaíso. In Argentina, Juan Manuel de Rosas opposed the Confederation’s support for anti-Rosas factions and saw its expansion as a threat to his control over northern territories.


Economic tensions further fueled hostilities. A tariff dispute between Peru and Chile escalated when both nations raised duties on key exports—Chilean wheat and Peruvian sugar. This economic rivalry dovetailed with deeper fears of Santa Cruz disrupting the regional balance of power.


Early Hostilities

The war's opening phase saw intrigue and preemptive strikes. Chilean ex-president Ramón Freire, exiled in Lima, attempted a rebellion against Chile with Confederate support but was swiftly defeated. In response, Chile raided Peruvian ports, seizing Confederate ships. These provocations led to Chile's declaration of war on December 28, 1836, while Argentina joined the conflict in 1837, despite internal strife and economic pressures.


Assassination of Diego Portales

In Chile, the war initially faced public opposition. However, the assassination of influential Chilean statesman Diego Portales by mutinous soldiers in 1837 galvanized public support for the war. Portales became a martyr, and the campaign against the Confederation gained national backing.


The First Campaign: The Treaty of Paucarpata

Chile launched an expedition in 1837 under Admiral Manuel Blanco Encalada, but logistical challenges and disease plagued the troops. Surrounded by Santa Cruz's forces near Arequipa, Blanco Encalada signed the Treaty of Paucarpata, agreeing to withdraw Chilean forces in exchange for trade agreements and debt settlements. The treaty was rejected by the Chilean government as a humiliation, and Blanco Encalada faced public disgrace.


The Second Campaign: Naval Supremacy and the Battle of Yungay

By 1838, Chile had achieved naval dominance, critical for transporting troops and disrupting Confederate supply lines. General Manuel Bulnes led a renewed campaign into Peru, engaging Confederate forces in a series of clashes.


  • Battle of Portada de Guías (1838): Chilean forces briefly captured Lima but withdrew upon the approach of Santa Cruz's army.
  • Naval Battle of Casma (1839): Chilean ships decisively defeated Confederate vessels, securing control over the Pacific coast.
  • Battle of Yungay (January 20, 1839): In a decisive engagement, Bulnes’ forces routed Santa Cruz’s army. The Confederation suffered heavy losses, and Santa Cruz fled into exile.


Aftermath and Dissolution of the Confederation

The victory at Yungay ended the war, leading to the dissolution of the Peru-Bolivian Confederation. Peru was reestablished as a unified state under General Agustín Gamarra, while Bolivia faced political instability. Chilean troops departed Peru later in 1839, having achieved their strategic objective.


Santa Cruz’s exile marked the end of his ambitions, and he spent the remainder of his life in Europe. The conflict also strained Chile’s and Argentina’s alliance, as mutual distrust between Portales and Rosas had prevented effective coordination during the war.


Long-Term Impact

  • National Consolidation: The war reinforced Chile’s national identity, portraying its victory as a defense of sovereignty and regional stability. For Peru, the conflict laid the groundwork for a renewed focus on unifying internal factions.
  • Regional Power Balance: Chile emerged as the dominant Pacific power, while Bolivia’s defeat curtailed its influence in the southern Andes.
  • Economic Rivalries: The dissolution of the Confederation reduced competition for Chilean trade dominance but left lingering tensions with Peru and Bolivia.
  • Geopolitical Precedent: The war highlighted the fragility of alliances in South America and set a precedent for regional conflicts shaped by both national ambitions and international diplomacy.


The War of the Confederation was a defining moment in 19th-century South America, reshaping political and economic dynamics and solidifying Chile's position as a regional power.

German Colonization of Southern Chile

1850 Jan 1 - 1875

Valdivia, Chile

German Colonization of Southern Chile
The Chilean colonization project took advantage of the Revolutions of 1848 in the German states to recruit immigrants. © Anonymous

The German colonization of Southern Chile, spanning from 1850 to 1875, brought over 30,000 immigrants to the regions around Valdivia, Osorno, and Llanquihue. This state-sponsored initiative not only transformed the area's economy and culture but also left a lasting mark on Chile’s national identity.


Early Beginnings

The idea of German settlement in Southern Chile emerged as a response to the isolation and underdevelopment of the region. In the 1840s, Bernhard Eunom Philippi, a German expatriate, advocated for colonization. Although his initial proposals were rejected, he partnered with Ferdinand Flindt, a German merchant in Valparaíso, to acquire land for future settlers. The first German families arrived in 1846 but were met with financial and legal challenges, as Flindt went bankrupt, and dubious land acquisitions complicated settlement plans. The immigrants were ultimately settled on Isla Teja in Valdivia, marking the first step in what would become a major colonization effort.


State-Sponsored Expansion

By the mid-19th century, Chilean authorities recognized the strategic importance of southern territories and the potential threat of foreign occupation. In 1845, the Law of Colonization and Vacant Lots was passed under President Manuel Montt, laying the foundation for organized settlement. Philippi, appointed as a government agent, traveled to Germany during the revolutions of 1848 to recruit immigrants. Despite initial resistance from German Catholic bishops, he secured permission to recruit Protestants as well. Most settlers brought their own financial means, while the government provided support to poorer Catholic families, who were settled inland.


Vicente Pérez Rosales succeeded Philippi as colonization agent and oversaw the settlement of the Llanquihue Lake area. Between 1852 and 1875, German immigrants established towns like Puerto Montt, Puerto Varas, and Frutillar, bringing with them advanced agricultural practices, craftsmanship, and industrial skills. By 1861, the region had developed into a formal province, with a growing population and infrastructure.


Economic and Cultural Transformation

German immigrants revitalized Valdivia’s economy, which had been in decline since independence. With their skills in agriculture, industry, and trade, they integrated the region into national and international markets. Timber from the Valdivian temperate rainforest became a key export, and German settlers introduced Chile's first brewery, established by Carl Anwandter in 1851.


The settlers also retained strong cultural ties to their German heritage, shaping the architecture, cuisine, and social life of the region. Towns like Valdivia and Puerto Montt became hubs of German cultural influence, with German-language schools, churches, and publications. Over time, the settlers adopted a dual identity, blending Chilean citizenship with their German roots.


Relations with Indigenous and Local Populations

Initial relations between Germans and the indigenous Mapuche and Huilliche were cordial, with trade and mutual cooperation common. However, as German settlers expanded their territories, conflicts over land ownership emerged. The Sociedad Stuttgart, a German colonization society, acquired large tracts of land under dubious conditions, displacing many Huilliche communities. These tensions culminated in uprisings, such as Mañil’s rebellion in 1859, which sought to assert Mapuche control over their ancestral lands.


Relations between German settlers and Chileans of Spanish descent were also complex. Germans viewed the local elite as lazy and unproductive, while some Chilean intellectuals criticized the Germans for failing to assimilate fully. Despite these frictions, the German community played a vital role in the economic and cultural development of Southern Chile.


Legacy

The German colonization of Southern Chile profoundly influenced the region’s architecture, with timber-framed houses and German engineering practices becoming hallmarks of the area. The settlers also introduced new words and customs, leaving an imprint on the local language and culture. For instance, the word "murra" (blackberry) reflects German linguistic influence.


Economically, the settlers modernized agriculture and established new industries, contributing to Chile's integration into global markets. Despite challenges, including land conflicts and cultural tensions, the German presence in Southern Chile remains a testament to the transformative power of immigration in shaping the country's identity and history.

1851 Chilean Revolution

1851 Apr 20 - Dec 31

Chile

1851 Chilean Revolution
José María de la Cruz, opposition presidential candidate and leader of the revolution © José Gil de Castro (1785–1841)

The Revolution of 1851 erupted in Chile as liberal forces sought to overthrow the conservative government of President Manuel Montt and dismantle the authoritarian framework established by the Constitution of 1833. This uprising, fueled by political frustration and regional tensions, unfolded in a series of violent confrontations that ended in a decisive victory for the conservative government. By late December 1851, the rebellion had been crushed, leaving deep political scars and lasting consequences.


After the Chilean Civil War of 1829–1830, Chile had been governed under a conservative system centralized around a strong presidency. The 1833 Constitution solidified this structure, but it also alienated liberals who sought broader democratic reforms and civil liberties. By the 1840s, a new wave of intellectuals and activists—Francisco Bilbao, José Victorino Lastarria, and others—began organizing through groups like the Society of Equality. Inspired by the European Revolutions of 1848, these liberals were determined to challenge the status quo.


The presidential election of 1851 became a flashpoint for these growing tensions. Conservative forces rallied behind Montt, while liberals and regional dissenters supported José María de la Cruz, a military leader from Concepción. When Montt’s victory was announced, the opposition accused the government of electoral fraud. Tensions boiled over on April 20, when Colonel Pedro Urriola Balbontín led an uprising in Santiago. He and his followers stormed the streets and barracks, hoping to ignite widespread resistance. However, the government responded swiftly, and after five hours of bloody fighting, the revolt was crushed, with Urriola among the dead.


The conflict soon spread to the provinces. In Concepción, José María de la Cruz mobilized an army of 4,000 men, including Mapuche allies led by Chief Mañil, whose participation reflected their opposition to Santiago's growing control over their lands. In La Serena, leaders like Pedro Pablo Muñoz formed revolutionary militias and declared the abolition of the 1833 Constitution. These movements marked the start of a broader uprising, with cities like Valparaíso and Punta Arenas also witnessing smaller revolts.


Despite these efforts, the government maintained the upper hand. The decisive confrontation came on December 8, 1851, at the Battle of Loncomilla, where government forces decisively defeated Cruz’s army. This loss effectively ended the rebellion in the south, leaving La Serena as the revolutionaries’ final stronghold. The situation in La Serena grew increasingly dire as government troops advanced. By late December, the city was captured with little resistance, as many of its defenders had departed to support a new revolt in Copiapó. On January 8, 1852, government forces crushed the last remnants of resistance at the Battle of Ramadilla, bringing the revolution to a definitive close.


In the aftermath, President Montt and his minister Antonio Varas launched a campaign of repression against their political opponents. Dozens of liberal leaders, including Bilbao and Lastarria, were arrested or exiled. The revolution’s failure also divided the opposition, with some liberals advocating for renewed armed resistance while others sought reform through legal and institutional means.


The Revolution of 1851 left Chile with a legacy of bloodshed and division. While the conservative regime emerged victorious, the rebellion highlighted the growing demand for political change. In the decades that followed, liberal ideas continued to gain traction, slowly reshaping Chile’s political landscape and setting the stage for future reform.

Pacification of Araucania

1861 Jan 1 - 1883

Araucania, Chile

Pacification of Araucania
Battle of Quechereguas, 1868. Charge of the Mapuche cavalry, commanded by the chief Quilapan against the Chilean troops under the command of Commander Pedro Lagos. © Luis Rogers

The Occupation of Araucanía (1861–1883), also known as the Pacification of Araucanía, was a transformative period in Chile's history, marked by military campaigns, colonization, and the incorporation of Mapuche territories into the Chilean state. Spanning two decades, this process disrupted centuries of Mapuche autonomy, fundamentally altering the social, political, and economic fabric of Araucanía while leaving a legacy of resistance, displacement, and cultural resilience.


Background and Early Relations

Araucanía, home to the Mapuche people, had long resisted Spanish conquest, maintaining its independence throughout the colonial period. Even after Chile gained independence in 1810, relations between the nascent republic and the Mapuche remained largely peaceful. However, by the mid-19th century, economic pressures, geopolitical concerns, and growing settler interest in Mapuche lands drove the Chilean government to assert control over Araucanía.


Agricultural expansion following the Chilean wheat boom and the California Gold Rush increased pressure on land acquisition. Araucanía, with its fertile lands and strategic location, became a focal point for colonization. At the same time, the Chilean state viewed the Mapuche as an obstacle to national unity and progress, portraying them as uncivilized and in need of assimilation.


Prelude to Conflict

Key events in the decades leading up to the occupation heightened tensions. The shipwreck of the Joven Daniel in 1849, looted by Mapuche tribes, fueled anti-Mapuche sentiment in Chilean society. In 1851 and 1859, Mapuche uprisings, led by chiefs such as Mañil, targeted settlers and military outposts, further solidifying the Chilean perception of the Mapuche as a threat. These uprisings and increasing settler encroachment underscored the urgency felt by Chilean authorities to secure Araucanía.


Colonel Cornelio Saavedra Rodríguez emerged as the principal architect of the occupation. Inspired by U.S. frontier policies, Saavedra proposed a state-led colonization program, combining military advances with the establishment of settlements to ensure Chilean control. In 1861, Saavedra launched the first phase of the occupation, focusing on securing the Malleco River as a defensive line.


Initial Advances (1861–1871)

The Chilean army, bolstered by settlers, constructed forts and gradually advanced southward. Early successes were met with fierce resistance. Mapuche warriors, led by the Arribanos and other factions, avoided large battles, instead using guerrilla tactics to harass Chilean forces. Scorched earth campaigns by the Chilean military devastated Mapuche communities, leading to widespread famine and a smallpox epidemic in 1869. By 1871, however, the two sides entered a period of relative peace.


Resumed Hostilities and Final Push (1881–1883)

During the War of the Pacific (1879–1883), Chile’s reduced military presence emboldened some Mapuche factions, resulting in renewed conflicts. In 1881, as the war in the north wound down, Chile launched a decisive campaign into Araucanía, culminating in the occupation of the Cautín River region and the founding of the town of Temuco. Despite fierce resistance, including the Mapuche uprising of 1881, coordinated Mapuche attacks were largely repelled. By 1883, the region was fully integrated into Chilean national territory with the reestablishment of Villarrica.


Aftermath and Legacy

The occupation devastated the Mapuche population. Thousands died from warfare, disease, and starvation. Many were displaced, losing access to traditional lands and livelihoods. The Chilean government confined surviving Mapuches to reductions, allocating a fraction of their former territory and forcing many into poverty. These reductions, comprising about 500,000 hectares, became centers of cultural resilience but also stark symbols of loss.


Colonization programs brought waves of European settlers—Italians, Swiss, and Boers, among others—who established towns and cultivated land, often at the expense of Mapuche communities. The economy of Araucanía shifted toward agriculture and timber extraction, with Mapuche pastoral practices disrupted by overgrazing on limited land.


The incorporation of Araucanía marked the end of Mapuche territorial autonomy but left a lasting cultural legacy. Despite the harsh conditions, Mapuche traditions, language, and identity endured. The Occupation of Araucanía remains a contentious chapter in Chilean history, symbolizing both the costs of state-building and the enduring resilience of the Mapuche people.

Liberal Era in Chile

1861 Jan 1 - 1891

Chile

Liberal Era in Chile
José Manuel Balmaceda © Fernando Laroche

In 19th-century Chile, political revolts brought little transformation to the rigid social structure inherited from colonial times. Wealthy landowners and the Roman Catholic Church retained significant influence, even as a strong presidency emerged. The political landscape was often shaped by family networks and elite interests, while broader social change lagged behind.


Territorial Expansion and Consolidation

The latter half of the 19th century saw Chile focus on consolidating its territory. In the Occupation of Araucanía, the Mapuche were forcibly subdued, allowing the government to expand Chilean control over the southern frontier. At the same time, territorial disputes with Argentina were settled through the Boundary Treaty of 1881, which secured Chilean sovereignty over the Strait of Magellan but ceded much of eastern Patagonia to Argentina.


In the War of the Pacific (1879–1883) against Peru and Bolivia, Chile annexed significant northern territories, gaining control of lucrative nitrate deposits. These resources ushered in a period of economic prosperity, enabling the country to strengthen its international standing while addressing internal development.


Diminishing Church Influence

By the 1870s, the Roman Catholic Church’s dominance began to wane as liberal reforms shifted certain traditional church functions to the state. Laws enacted during this period transferred the registration of births and marriages to civil authorities, signaling the slow but steady secularization of Chilean society.


Balmaceda and the Civil War of 1891

The presidency of José Manuel Balmaceda, beginning in 1886, marked a departure from earlier liberal policies. Balmaceda pursued ambitious economic reforms, including state-led investments in public works, education, and infrastructure. However, his approach brought him into conflict with Congress, as he concentrated power and ignored constitutional limits, gradually veering toward authoritarian rule.


The tension culminated in the Chilean Civil War of 1891, sparked by Congress’s decision to depose Balmaceda. Refusing to resign, Balmaceda faced opposition led by Jorge Montt and other military figures. The conflict spread across the country, with battles between government and congressional forces determining Chile's future. After Balmaceda’s defeat, he sought asylum in the Argentine embassy in Santiago, where he later committed suicide.


Montt assumed the presidency after the civil war, ushering in a period of parliamentary dominance that defined Chile's political trajectory into the early 20th century. The war left a legacy of deepened divisions between the executive and legislative branches, shaping the nation’s evolving democratic system.

War of the Pacific

1879 Apr 5 - 1883 Oct 20

Peru

War of the Pacific
Battle of Iquique © Thomas Somerscales (1842–1927)

The War of the Pacific (1879–1884) was a transformative conflict in South America, pitting Chile against a BolivianPeruvian alliance. The war was primarily driven by disputes over nitrate-rich territories in the Atacama Desert, alongside deeper economic and geopolitical tensions. It ended with Chile’s decisive victory, territorial expansion, and lasting effects on the region's political and social landscapes.


Origins and Outbreak

The roots of the war lay in unresolved colonial borders and economic rivalries over guano and nitrates, valuable resources for fertilizer and explosives. Bolivia exacerbated tensions by imposing a tax on the Chilean-controlled Compañía de Salitres y Ferrocarril de Antofagasta (CSFA), violating the 1874 treaty that prohibited new taxes on Chilean enterprises in Bolivian territory. When Bolivia seized the company’s assets and auctioned them in February 1879, Chile occupied the Bolivian port of Antofagasta.


Bolivia declared war on Chile on March 1, 1879, invoking its secret defensive alliance with Peru. When Chile demanded Peru remain neutral, Peru refused, leading to Chile's declaration of war against Peru on April 5.


Naval Campaign

The initial phase of the war unfolded at sea, as control of naval routes was critical for supplying troops in the arid desert. The Peruvian navy, led by the ironclad Huáscar, delayed Chilean advances through daring raids. However, in the Battle of Angamos (October 8, 1879), Chile captured the Huáscar, securing naval supremacy. This victory allowed Chile to launch land invasions.


Land Campaigns

Chile's army swiftly occupied the nitrate-rich Bolivian territory of Litoral, effectively making Bolivia landlocked. Bolivia’s forces retreated after the Battle of Tacna (May 26, 1880), leaving Peru to continue the fight alone.


The war moved into Peruvian territory with the Campaign of Lima (1880–1881). Chilean forces defeated Peru in the battles of Chorrillos and Miraflores, capturing Lima in January 1881. Despite the occupation, Peruvian irregular forces, led by Andrés Cáceres, waged guerrilla resistance in the mountainous interior during the Campaign of the Sierra (1881–1884).


End of the War

The war formally ended with the Treaty of Ancón on October 20, 1883, where Peru ceded the province of Tarapacá to Chile. Chile also gained temporary control over Tacna and Arica, which were to be decided by a plebiscite. Bolivia, having withdrawn earlier, signed a truce with Chile in 1884, ceding its Litoral province permanently. The Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1904) later formalized Bolivia's landlocked status, with Chile granting Bolivia access to ports via rail and duty-free zones.


Consequences

  • For Chile: The victory expanded Chile's territory by a third and secured control over lucrative nitrate deposits, fueling economic growth and modernization.
  • For Peru: The loss of Tarapacá devastated its economy and national pride, but guerrilla resistance became a symbol of resilience.
  • For Bolivia: The loss of its coastal territory left Bolivia landlocked, creating a lasting national grievance and shaping its foreign policy.


Legacy

The war left deep scars. Bolivia’s quest for sovereign access to the sea remains a central issue in its relations with Chile. Meanwhile, the conflict fostered lingering tensions between Chile and Peru, despite eventual resolution of the Tacna-Arica dispute in 1929. The War of the Pacific reshaped the geopolitical map of South America, demonstrating the enduring influence of economic and territorial ambitions.

Patagonia Border Question between Argentina & Chile

1881 Jan 1 - 1902

Patagonia, Río Gallegos, Santa

Patagonia Border Question between Argentina & Chile
Argentina sought to prevent Chile from gaining a foothold near Buenos Aires, fearing potential indigenous uprisings fueled by Chilean influence. © Anonymous

In the early 19th century, Argentina and Chile emerged as independent nations with overlapping claims to Patagonia, a vast and largely uncharted region. Chile’s constitution of 1833 declared the Andes as its eastern boundary, while Argentine leaders viewed Patagonia as an extension of their territorial inheritance. Both nations saw the potential for economic and strategic gain, particularly regarding control of the Strait of Magellan. Chile’s settlement efforts in the strait, including the establishment of Fuerte Bulnes and later Punta Arenas, solidified its presence. At the same time, Argentina pushed forward its own expansionist policies, building fortifications like the Zanja de Alsina and launching military campaigns in the Conquest of the Desert.


Chilean Perspective

The Chilean constitution of 1833 defined the Andes as the nation's eastern boundary. Historian Miguel Luis Amunátegui later expanded Chile's claims, arguing the nation inherited Spanish rights to Patagonia extending to the Strait of Magellan. Chile’s strategic colonization of the strait, including the establishment of Fuerte Bulnes (1843) and Punta Arenas (1847), reinforced these claims.


Argentine Perspective

Argentina viewed Patagonia as part of its territory under Spanish rule. Concerns about indigenous groups allied with Chile and raids on cattle in the pampas drove Argentina to fortify its presence with projects like the Zanja de Alsina (a defensive trench) and campaigns during the Conquest of the Desert (1876–1878). These actions aimed to secure control over northern Patagonia and the eastern mouth of the Strait of Magellan.


East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan Dispute between Argentina & Chile (1842-1881). © Janitoalevic

East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan Dispute between Argentina & Chile (1842-1881). © Janitoalevic


The Boundary Treaty of 1881 between Argentina and Chile marked a pivotal moment in the history of South American diplomacy, aiming to resolve the territorial disputes that had simmered since both nations achieved independence from Spain. Signed on July 23, 1881, in Buenos Aires, the treaty sought to define a border in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego based on colonial-era boundaries, an agreement that would shape the modern contours of the two nations.


The Boundary Treaty established Argentina's sovereignty over most of Patagonia, while Chile retained lands west of the Andes. In Tierra del Fuego, the treaty divided the island, granting Chile control of the western portion and full possession of the Strait of Magellan. These provisions reflected a compromise: Argentina’s dominance in the mainland’s interior balanced against Chile’s strategic hold on the strait.


However, the treaty left ambiguities, particularly in Patagonia’s uncharted regions. Disputes arose over whether the border should follow the highest peaks or the continental watershed. In Tierra del Fuego, cartographic errors required corrections to align the boundary with geographical realities. These issues necessitated arbitration in the decades that followed.


This map shows the disputed territories between Chile and Argentina between 1881 and 1902 and its resolution with the arbitration award of the King of the United Kingdom Edward VII. © Janitoalevic

This map shows the disputed territories between Chile and Argentina between 1881 and 1902 and its resolution with the arbitration award of the King of the United Kingdom Edward VII. © Janitoalevic


In 1902, tensions flared once again as both nations disagreed on the precise border alignment. King Edward VII of Britain mediated, and the arbitration resulted in a compromise that divided several Andean lakes, including O’Higgins/San Martín, between the two countries. The decision took into account both natural geography and the preferences of local settlers, such as those in Trevelin, who had been consulted during the process. The treaty and subsequent arbitrations helped avert war and established the groundwork for peace between Argentina and Chile.

Annexation of Rapa Nui

1888 Sep 9

Easter Island, Chile

Annexation of Rapa Nui
"Queen Mother" Koreto with her daughters "Queen" Caroline and Harriette in 1877. © Émile Bayard (1837–1891)

In 1776, Chilean priest Juan Ignacio Molina highlighted Easter Island for its "monumental statues" in his writings on Chilean islands. Centuries later, in 1837, the Chilean Navy’s ship Colo Colo, under Teniente de Marina Leoncio Señoret, became the first Chilean vessel to visit the island during its voyage to Australia.


By 1870, Chilean Navy Captain Policarpo Toro arrived at the island aboard the corvette O'Higgins. Witnessing the devastation caused by piracy, slave raids, and internal strife, which had brought the Rapa Nui population to near extinction, Toro envisioned a future where the island could find protection under Chilean sovereignty. His concern sparked official interest, although initial investigations by Chile in 1870, led by Captain Luis Ignacio Gana, stopped short of proposing annexation.


Concrete actions began in 1887, as Captain Toro took it upon himself to secure the island for Chile. Working alongside figures such as Bishop Salvador Donoso Rodríguez, Toro negotiated the purchase of land from foreign owners, using both personal funds and a 6,000-pound sterling allocation from the Chilean government. Despite traditional Rapa Nui beliefs that lands were inalienable, third-party claims were bought out to eliminate external interference.


On September 9, 1888, the Agreement of Wills was signed between Atamu Tekena, leader of the Rapanui Council of Chiefs, and Chilean representatives led by Policarpo Toro. The Rapa Nui ceded sovereignty to Chile while retaining their rights to land, cultural traditions, and leadership titles. This agreement marked the island’s formal integration into Chile, ensuring an end to slave raids and providing a semblance of stability.


However, the island’s fortunes did not improve immediately. By 1895, the Compañía Explotadora de Isla de Pascua, owned by Enrique Merlet, gained control of the island, following Chile’s failed colonization efforts after the Civil War of 1891. The company imposed strict rules, confining Rapa Nui inhabitants to Hanga Roa and exploiting them for forced labor. Relief only came when the Chilean Navy reasserted control, granting the islanders safe passage across the island.


In 1903, the Merlet company sold the island to the British sheep-farming enterprise Williamson Balfour. This transfer exacerbated hardships for the Rapa Nui, as they were forced to work on ranches for sustenance. Nevertheless, Chilean naval interventions throughout the 20th century gradually improved the situation, though it would take decades for the Rapa Nui people to regain agency over their ancestral lands and lives.

Argentine–Chilean Naval Arms Race
Libertad, seen here c. 1893, was laid down in 1890 as part of the developing naval arms race between Argentina and Chile © Museo Naval de Puerto Belgrano

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Argentina and Chile engaged in a costly naval arms race, driven by mutual distrust and competing territorial claims, especially in Patagonia. Though both nations began with limited naval capabilities, their fleets expanded significantly during this period, culminating in an intense build-up of modern warships.


Early Tensions and Naval Growth

By the 1860s, neither Argentina nor Chile had a significant navy, but geopolitical pressures spurred naval investments. Chile's involvement in the Chincha Islands War against Spain and Argentina's concerns over Brazil's naval strength prompted both countries to acquire modern ships. Chile initially gained an edge during the War of the Pacific (1879–1883), emerging with the most formidable navy in the Americas. This dominance allowed Chile to flex its naval power, such as in 1885, when the cruiser Esmeralda was dispatched to Panama to deter United States annexation efforts.


Meanwhile, disputes over Patagonian territories heightened tensions. Incidents, such as the seizure of ships by both nations in the 1870s, nearly led to war in 1878, avoided only through a hastily signed treaty. However, as both countries focused on internal conflicts - Argentina’s campaigns against indigenous peoples and Chile’s war with Peru and Bolivia - these disputes temporarily subsided.


Escalating Arms Race

In the late 1880s, Chile reignited the arms race by ordering a new battleship, Capitán Prat, alongside cruisers and torpedo boats. Argentina responded with its own battleships and cruisers, funded largely by agricultural exports. This tit-for-tat acquisition pattern persisted into the 1890s. Chile's navy remained superior in terms of ship size and crew experience, but Argentina sought to outpace its rival by acquiring advanced armored cruisers like the Garibaldi-class.


The Chilean Civil War of 1891 further underscored the navy's strategic importance. The victorious Congressional forces relied heavily on naval power, leading to increased funding and prestige for the Chilean Navy. Both nations continued their naval expansion, with Chile ordering additional cruisers and torpedo boats, while Argentina acquired powerful ships like the Buenos Aires and more Garibaldi-class cruisers.


By the late 1890s, tensions peaked, and war seemed imminent. In 1898, both nations agreed to submit their territorial disputes to British arbitration, temporarily easing hostilities. However, the arms race resumed, with Chile ordering new battleships and Argentina planning even larger vessels.


Resolution: The Pacts of May (1902)

Fearing the economic consequences of war and encouraged by British mediation, Argentina and Chile signed the Pacts of May in 1902. These agreements resolved border disputes and included a naval-limiting clause, barring further warship acquisitions for five years unless advance notice was given. Ships under construction were sold off, with Chile’s battleships becoming the British Swiftsure-class and Argentina's cruisers sold to Japan.


Both nations also disarmed existing vessels, retaining only their primary armaments. This marked a temporary end to the arms race, reducing tensions and fostering a period of diplomatic rapprochement.


Aftermath and Renewed Competition

The naval arms race had strained both countries financially. Argentina’s naval purchases were funded through foreign loans, swelling its debt to 421 million gold pesos by 1896. Chile similarly borrowed heavily, depleting its credit and prompting a temporary freeze on loans.


Despite the success of the Pacts of May, peace was short-lived. In 1907, Brazil’s ambitious naval program, including the purchase of powerful dreadnoughts, reignited competition. Argentina and Chile quickly abandoned the naval restrictions and embarked on a new arms race to match Brazil's modern battleships, signaling a shift to a broader regional competition.


Legacy

The Argentine-Chilean naval arms race underscored the geopolitical rivalry in the Southern Cone, with both nations vying for supremacy. Although costly and ultimately destabilizing, the resolution through the Pacts of May demonstrated the potential for diplomacy to temper militarization. Yet, the broader regional dynamics of naval power ensured that this was only a temporary respite in South America’s pursuit of military dominance.

Chilean Civil War of 1891

1891 Jan 16 - Sep 18

Chilean Sea, Chile

Chilean Civil War of 1891
Battle of Concón, Chile. 21 August 1891. © Luis Fernando Rojas

The Chilean Civil War of 1891 was a turbulent chapter in Chile's history, sparked by a rift between President José Manuel Balmaceda and the nation’s congress. This nine-month conflict saw the country divided between the presidential forces, aligned with the army, and the congressional faction, backed by the navy. It marked the end of Chile's Liberal Republic and ushered in the Parliamentary Era.


Rift Between Balmaceda and Congress

By 1889, President Balmaceda found himself at odds with the Chilean congress. The president believed the constitution granted him the authority to appoint ministers without congressional approval, but congress insisted on its power to control the cabinet. The situation escalated when Balmaceda announced his intention to name his ally Claudio Vicuña as his successor, further alienating congress. When congress refused to approve the national budget for 1891, Balmaceda declared that the 1890 budget would remain in effect. This act enraged his opponents, who saw it as unconstitutional.


On January 1, 1891, Balmaceda’s bold move prompted congressional leaders, including Waldo Silva and Ramón Barros Luco, to declare the president deposed. They aligned with the navy under Captain Jorge Montt, who took command of the congressional fleet. With the navy's support, the congressional forces established a rebel base in the northern province of Tarapacá, where they began recruiting an army to challenge Balmaceda.


Early Struggles

In the opening months, the warlines were stark: Balmaceda controlled a large standing army but lacked a strong navy, while the congressional forces had naval superiority but limited ground troops. The conflict soon escalated. The congressional fleet moved north to Tarapacá, capturing strategic ports like Iquique and Pisagua. Despite initial setbacks, the rebels rallied under Colonel Estanislao del Canto, achieving a decisive victory at the Battle of Pozo Almonte in March 1891, scattering Balmaceda’s northern forces.


The Sinking of Blanco Encalada

Balmaceda struck back in April. His torpedo gunboats, Almirante Lynch and Almirante Condell, scored a major victory by sinking the congressional flagship, Blanco Encalada, in Caldera Bay. This marked one of the first uses of naval torpedoes in warfare and dealt a significant blow to the congressional navy. However, it did little to halt the rebel advance, as their forces continued to consolidate in the north.


The Congressional Offensive

By mid-1891, the congressional junta had raised a formidable army of 20,000 men. Under the leadership of General del Canto and German military adviser Emil Körner, the rebel forces were meticulously trained and armed. In August, they launched a bold offensive. Landing at Quintero, just north of Valparaíso, the rebel army quickly moved to engage Balmaceda’s forces entrenched at Concón.


On August 21, the Battle of Concón unfolded. Congressional forces stormed across the Aconcagua River, overwhelming Balmaceda’s troops and inflicting heavy casualties. The victory not only decimated Balmaceda’s forces but also boosted the rebel ranks as captured soldiers defected to their cause.


Final Blow at Placilla

With the road to Valparaíso open, the rebels pressed their advantage. Balmaceda, desperate to stop their advance, consolidated his remaining forces under General Orozimbo Barbosa at Placilla. On August 28, the decisive Battle of Placilla took place. Despite holding a strong defensive position, Balmaceda’s army was outmaneuvered and crushed. The rebels emerged victorious, leaving thousands dead or wounded on both sides.


Valparaíso fell to the congressional forces the same day, and Santiago was occupied shortly after. With his government in collapse, Balmaceda took refuge in the Argentine embassy.


Balmaceda’s Fall and Aftermath

On September 18, the day his presidential term officially ended, Balmaceda, fearing retribution, committed suicide. His death brought an end to the bloodiest conflict in Chilean history, with over 10,000 lives lost. The congressional forces assumed control, establishing a new government and marking the start of Chile’s Parliamentary Era.


This period, while diminishing the power of the presidency, failed to create a true parliamentary system, as the legislature often dominated governance. The scars of the civil war lingered, shaping Chile’s political landscape for decades to come.

Parliamentary Era in Chile

1891 Jan 17 - 1925

Chile

Parliamentary Era in Chile
Picture of the 1915 presidential election in Chile. © Anonymous

The Parliamentary Republic of Chile (1891–1925) emerged after the Civil War of 1891, signaling a shift in political power from the presidency to the National Congress. While not a true parliamentary system, as the executive was not formally subordinate to the legislature, it represented a unique governance structure in Latin America. The president's role became largely ceremonial, with Congress dominating government through its influence over cabinet appointments and fiscal policies.


Political Structure and Instability

In this pseudo-parliamentary system, the Minister of the Interior effectively acted as the chief executive, selected indirectly by Congress. However, the president lacked the power to dissolve Congress, unlike in traditional parliamentary systems, making it difficult to resolve disputes between the executive and legislature. Cabinets frequently rotated, often formed by coalition governments that reflected shifting political alliances rather than stability or ideological unity.


Political parties, dominated by individual caudillos or factional leaders, operated with little internal discipline. The Liberal and Conservative parties often allied with the Radical Party in varying combinations, creating unstable coalitions. Bribery, electoral fraud, and clientelism defined elections, particularly in rural areas, where local bosses controlled the process and often coerced voters.


Economy and Saltpeter Dependency

The Chilean economy during this period heavily relied on nitrate mining, particularly in the northern saltpeter fields. Revenue from nitrate exports formed the backbone of state finances, funding infrastructure projects such as railroads, ports, and roads. However, this dependence left Chile vulnerable to fluctuations in global demand and eventual competition from synthetic fertilizers. The wealth generated by the nitrate trade disproportionately benefited the landed elite and foreign investors, while workers endured exploitative conditions in mining camps and industrial centers.


Social Strata and Urbanization

Chilean society was starkly divided into three classes. The oligarchy, consisting of landlords, politicians, and nitrate entrepreneurs, lived in luxury and wielded significant political influence. The middle classes, including small business owners and professionals, sought political representation through parties like the Radical Party. Meanwhile, the working classes, comprising miners, industrial laborers, and landless peasants, endured harsh conditions. Urban workers lived in overcrowded conventillos, while miners in the north toiled in remote camps under extreme environmental conditions.


Rapid urbanization exacerbated social tensions as the working class grew in size and organization. Labor unrest was common, but governments often responded with repression. By the 1910s, the emergence of labor-oriented political movements, such as the Democrat Party and the Socialist Workers’ Party (later the Communist Party), signaled a shift toward greater worker mobilization.


Achievements and Limitations

The Parliamentary Republic was marked by its democratic stability and relative control over the military, especially compared to later authoritarian regimes. Civil liberties generally remained intact, and suffrage expanded incrementally. New political players, such as the Democrats and Radicals, gained influence, diversifying the political landscape. However, critics of the era point to its inability to address systemic issues like economic inequality, reliance on volatile nitrate revenues, and the challenges of urbanization.


President Ramón Barros Luco (1910–1915) famously captured the laissez-faire ethos of the time, remarking that problems either resolved themselves or could not be solved at all. This passive approach epitomized the government's failure to enact meaningful social or economic reforms, even as inflation and poverty surged.


Decline and Transition

The Parliamentary Republic came to an end with the 1925 Constitution, drafted under President Arturo Alessandri. This new framework reasserted presidential authority, introduced direct presidential elections, and curbed congressional influence. The changes sought to modernize Chile’s governance and respond to the social and economic challenges that had been neglected during the parliamentary period.


Though the Parliamentary Republic was an era of political experimentation and gradual democratic expansion, its inefficiency and elitist nature made it ill-suited to address the demands of a rapidly transforming society. Its legacy remains a subject of both critique and appreciation, highlighting the complexities of Chilean political development.

1900
Modern Chile

Santa María School Massacre

1907 Dec 21

Iquique, Chile

Santa María School Massacre
Domingo Santa María School of Iquique, around 1907. © Photographic Archive of the Historical Museum of Chile

The Santa María School Massacre of 1907 stands as one of the darkest chapters in Chile's labor history, reflecting the acute social tensions of the time. It occurred in Iquique, during a massive strike by nitrate miners demanding better wages and working conditions in the unforgiving desert of the Norte Grande. The massacre marked a culmination of decades of harsh labor exploitation and governmental indifference in the nitrate industry, which was vital to Chile's economy during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.


Prelude to the Massacre

The nitrate industry dominated Chile's economy, employing tens of thousands of workers in harsh conditions. These miners lived in company towns, or oficinas, where employers controlled every aspect of life. They were paid in tokens valid only at company stores, and wages were often withheld for months. Workers sought government intervention, but the Parliamentary Republic (1891–1925) was largely aligned with the elite, showing little interest in labor reforms. Earlier protests, including strikes in Valparaíso in 1903 and Santiago's meat riots in 1905, failed to bring about substantial change.


In December 1907, a general strike erupted in the nitrate-rich Tarapacá Province. Known as the 18 Pence Strike, workers demanded better wages, safer working conditions, and the abolition of the token payment system. Thousands of miners and their families marched to Iquique to present their demands, joined by supporters from across the region. The city became paralyzed as commerce and industry ground to a halt.


Escalation and Government Response

The Chilean government, led by President Pedro Montt, dispatched additional troops to Iquique to suppress the strike. General Roberto Silva Renard was tasked with restoring order. On December 19, he arrived with orders from the Minister of the Interior, Rafael Sotomayor, to use any means necessary to disperse the strikers.


Tensions escalated as workers refused to leave their gathering points, particularly the Santa María School and Manuel Montt Plaza, fearing reprisals if they dispersed. On December 20, troops opened fire on a group of strikers attempting to leave, killing six. The following day, General Silva Renard issued an ultimatum: the strikers had one hour to vacate the school and return to work. When they refused, he ordered the troops to open fire.


The Massacre

At 2:30 PM on December 21, 1907, soldiers began shooting at the workers' leaders, who stood atop the school. The initial volley killed them instantly. Chaos ensued as troops, armed with rifles and machine guns, turned their fire on the crowd of strikers, including women and children. The massacre extended to the school grounds, where soldiers entered classrooms and playgrounds, indiscriminately killing anyone they encountered.


The exact number of victims remains disputed. General Silva Renard’s initial report mentioned 140 deaths, later revised to 195. However, estimates from eyewitnesses and historians suggest a death toll ranging from 2,000 to 3,600. Many bodies were buried in mass graves to obscure the scale of the atrocity.


Aftermath and Consequences

The massacre broke the strike and imposed a climate of fear among labor movements, halting significant union activity for over a decade. The government faced limited backlash; Congress largely ignored the incident, and no meaningful reforms were implemented until the 1920s, when minimum labor standards were introduced. General Silva Renard survived an assassination attempt in 1914 by a Spanish anarchist whose brother had died in the massacre but succumbed to his injuries years later.

Revolution, Reform, and Reaction: Chile’s Interwar Political Turmoil
Arturo Alessandri Palma ( 1868 - 1950) President of the Republic of Chile in two periods (1920-1925, 1932-1938). © Anonymous

The turbulent period of Chilean history from the mid-1920s to the early 1930s marked a transition from military coups to constitutional reforms, economic upheaval, and political experimentation, culminating in the brief establishment of the Socialist Republic of Chile. This era was shaped by the ambitions of political leaders, the challenges of the Great Depression, and the shifting alliances within Chilean society.


Coup of 1925 and Alessandri’s Reforms

In 1925, Colonel Marmaduque Grove led a left-wing faction of the military to depose the September Junta, transferring power to General Pedro Dartnell as interim president. The goal was to recall Arturo Alessandri Palma from exile, but Dartnell instead formed the January Junta. Ultimately, Alessandri returned to power on March 20, 1925, and initiated significant reforms, including the drafting of a new constitution. Approved in a referendum, the 1925 Constitution centralized presidential powers, curbing the legislature's influence. Alessandri also established the Central Bank, signaling a departure from laissez-faire policies.


Despite initial left-wing support, Alessandri's administration soon faced backlash, particularly after brutal crackdowns on labor protests, including the Marusia and La Coruña massacres. This alienated the working class and exacerbated tensions within his cabinet. Colonel Carlos Ibáñez del Campo, a rising figure who had participated in the January Junta, became a rival, eventually forcing Alessandri's resignation on October 2, 1925.


Ibáñez’s Rise and Dictatorship

Following Alessandri's departure, Emiliano Figueroa Larraín was elected president in 1925 with the backing of Ibáñez. However, Figueroa faced increasing pressure from Ibáñez, who, as Minister of the Interior, positioned himself as the de facto power behind the presidency. In 1927, Ibáñez persuaded Figueroa to resign and assumed the presidency after a heavily manipulated election.


Ibáñez’s administration, initially popular, became increasingly authoritarian. He ruled by decree, suppressed dissent, and exiled political opponents, including Alessandri and Grove. His ambitious public works projects, funded by American loans, included infrastructure improvements and the establishment of the Carabineros de Chile (national police). However, the economic collapse following the 1929 Great Depression devastated Chile's export-dependent economy. Public unrest mounted as unemployment soared and Ibáñez’s lavish spending failed to stabilize the country. In July 1931, protests forced Ibáñez to resign and flee into exile.


Socialist Republic of Chile (1932)

The political vacuum left by Ibáñez’s departure saw a series of short-lived administrations. President Juan Esteban Montero, elected in 1931, struggled to maintain stability amid the economic crisis and growing discontent. On June 4, 1932, a coalition of socialists, air force officers, and army personnel led by Marmaduque Grove, Carlos Dávila, and Eugenio Matte staged a coup, proclaiming the Socialist Republic of Chile.


The new government implemented radical measures, including suspending evictions, redistributing pawned goods, and providing free meals for the unemployed. However, internal divisions and external opposition, including from the Communist Party and conservative sectors, quickly undermined the junta. On June 16, Carlos Dávila ousted Grove and Matte, consolidating power as provisional president. His authoritarian measures alienated the military and public, leading to his resignation on September 13, 1932.


Return to Democracy and Alessandri’s Second Presidency

The interim government under General Bartolomé Blanche and later Supreme Court President Abraham Oyanedel organized elections. In October 1932, Arturo Alessandri won the presidency with 54% of the vote, defeating Grove, who remained in exile.


Alessandri’s second administration sought to stabilize Chile politically and economically. He relied on the republican forces to suppress potential coups and addressed the economic crisis through pragmatic policies. Treasury Minister Gustavo Ross implemented measures to reduce fiscal deficits and stimulate economic recovery, including infrastructure projects like the National Stadium. Alessandri also faced challenges from emerging radical movements, such as the National Socialist Movement of Chile and rural uprisings like the Ranquil Massacre in 1934.


Legacy

This tumultuous period left a complex legacy. The 1925 Constitution marked a shift toward a strong executive, but the era also highlighted the fragility of Chile’s political institutions amid economic and social crises. The brief Socialist Republic and the subsequent return to democracy underscored the competing visions for Chile’s future. By the late 1930s, Chile was on a path of cautious reform, with Alessandri navigating a middle ground between conservative forces and the demands of an increasingly mobilized populace.

Radical Governments of Chile

1938 Jan 1 - 1952

Chile

Radical Governments of Chile
Pedro Aguirre Cerda, President of Chile (1938-1941). © Archivo Fotográfico del Museo Histórico

The Radical Governments of Chile (1938–1952) marked a transformative era in Chilean political history, showcasing a blend of progressive initiatives and internal challenges. Emerging from the principles of the French Revolution—liberty, equality, and solidarity—the Radical Party rose to power, championing the middle class and fostering alliances within the Popular Front coalition. These years saw profound strides in industrialization, education, and social reforms, as well as significant political shifts, culminating in internal divisions and external tensions.


Pedro Aguirre Cerda (1938–1941): Governing Is Educating

Pedro Aguirre Cerda's presidency epitomized the ideals of education and progress. Elected under the Popular Front coalition, his narrow victory over conservative candidate Gustavo Ross reflected growing support for leftist reforms. His administration focused on expanding education, creating thousands of schools, and establishing technical institutions.


The devastating 1939 earthquake spurred Aguirre to create the Corporación de Fomento de la Producción (CORFO), which spearheaded industrialization. State enterprises such as ENAP (oil), ENDESA (electricity), and CAP (steel) laid the foundation for Chile's modern economy.


Political challenges arose with the Ariostazo, a failed coup influenced by fascist ideology, reflecting tensions within the military. Aguirre also welcomed 2,200 Spanish Republican refugees aboard the Winnipeg, a humanitarian gesture led by poet Pablo Neruda. Despite his achievements, Aguirre's tenure was cut short by illness, and he passed away in 1941.


Juan Antonio Ríos (1942–1946): Navigating Instability

Juan Antonio Ríos, representing the conservative wing of the Radical Party, faced a fragmented political landscape. His presidency coincided with World War II, during which Chile initially maintained neutrality. Under United States pressure, Ríos broke ties with the Axis in 1943, gaining access to Lend-Lease aid and economic support.


Domestically, Ríos struggled with labor unrest and opposition from both the Communist Party and right-wing factions. The Radical Party's internal demands for sweeping reforms, including recognition of the USSR and cabinet exclusivity, led to tensions. Ríos' refusal to comply alienated his own party, resulting in a cabinet reshuffle and loss of parliamentary support.


Economic challenges, including falling copper prices, compounded Ríos' difficulties. Stricken with terminal cancer, he delegated power in 1946, leaving behind a legacy of strained alliances and unfulfilled potential.


Gabriel González Videla (1946–1952): The Divisive Turn

Gabriel González Videla's presidency highlighted the shifting dynamics within the Radical Party. Aligned with the Communist Party during his campaign, González won the 1946 election with their support. However, his subsequent fallout with the communists marked a turning point. Tensions culminated in the "Cursed Law" (Ley Maldita) of 1948, which banned the Communist Party and exiled prominent figures, including Pablo Neruda. This move aligned González with right-wing conservatives, creating a tenuous coalition.


González faced labor strikes, economic volatility, and opposition from both leftist and conservative factions. Despite these challenges, his government achieved milestones, including the full integration of women into political life, the creation of the Antártica Chilena Province, and the establishment of Chile's Exclusive Economic Zone.


However, political instability and economic discontent marred his presidency. The 1949 parliamentary elections weakened his coalition, and divisions between radicals and conservatives left González with limited power to enact reforms.


Legacy of the Radical Governments

The Radical era was a paradoxical blend of ambitious reforms and political discord. It laid the groundwork for Chile's industrial and social modernization while grappling with the challenges of coalition politics and shifting ideologies. The influence of these governments extended into the subsequent decades, shaping Chile's political and economic trajectory.

Chile during World War II

1939 Jan 1 - 1945

Chile

Chile during World War II
Nazi Insurrection was quelled in Chile. © Anonymous

Chile's experience during World War II reveals a trajectory of initial neutrality, cautious maneuvering amidst geopolitical pressures, and eventual alignment with the Allied cause. At the outbreak of war in 1939, Chile declared neutrality, motivated by strong economic ties to Germany and a broader reluctance to be drawn into the European conflict. However, this stance evolved as global events unfolded.


A significant turning point occurred in September 1938, when a failed Nazi-backed coup in Chile damaged the German community’s reputation and shifted public sentiment against pro-Axis elements. Despite neutrality, the Chilean government began distancing itself from the Axis powers, including dismissing pro-German military officers. Relations deteriorated further following the sinking of the Chilean merchant ship Toltén by a German U-boat in March 1942, sparking outrage and anti-German demonstrations.


On January 20, 1943, Chile severed diplomatic ties with the Axis nations, marking a formal shift in its foreign policy. Fears of Japanese expansion in the Pacific prompted Chile to fortify naval defenses around Easter Island and key ports such as Valparaíso and Talcahuano. Chilean merchant ships collaborated with other Latin American nations in patrolling the Panama Canal Zone, highlighting its strategic importance in securing Allied shipping routes.


Domestically, Chilean authorities interned citizens of Axis nations in the Pisagua prison camp between 1943 and 1945. Newly declassified documents from 2017 revealed that Chile’s Investigative Police had uncovered and disrupted a Nazi plot to sabotage copper mines and the Panama Canal, underscoring the country's role in thwarting Axis espionage in South America.


On April 13, 1945, Chile declared war on Japan, aligning fully with the Allied cause and becoming the last Latin American nation to do so. This marked the culmination of Chile’s gradual transformation from neutrality to active engagement in the global conflict.

Mass Politics and Modernization in Chile
Ibáñez during his second presidency. © Anonymous

Chile entered a transformative period after World War II, marked by economic transition and the rise of mass politics. Industrialization began to eclipse agriculture as the dominant economic sector, reshaping the country's social and economic structures. The political landscape also shifted significantly, with the emergence of centrist forces like the Christian Democrats and the enfranchisement of women, who voted for the first time in the 1952 presidential election. This era saw political instability, ambitious reforms, and the struggles of governments to navigate Chile’s changing social dynamics.


Carlos Ibáñez (1952–1958): The General of Hope

Returning to power after a 24-year hiatus, General Carlos Ibáñez campaigned as an anti-establishment candidate promising to "sweep" away corruption. He won the 1952 election with nearly 47% of the vote, bolstered by a vague platform that appealed to both left- and right-wing voters.


Ibáñez's second presidency was tumultuous. Despite initial support from right-wing and dissident socialist factions, his administration faced parliamentary opposition that undermined his ability to govern effectively. Efforts to curb inflation, including wage and price freezes, led to economic stagnation and rising public discontent. Inflation surged to 83% in 1955 before declining to 33% by the end of his term, aided by the Klein-Saks mission's economic advice.


Ibáñez repealed the controversial Law for the Defense of Democracy, allowing the Communist Party to re-enter politics, but his presidency was marred by labor unrest. A nationwide strike in 1954 and violent student protests in 1957 exposed his waning authority. Attempts by right-wing factions to instigate a self-coup failed, and Ibáñez ended his term isolated and with diminished influence.


Jorge Alessandri (1958–1964): A Technocrat in Turmoil

Jorge Alessandri, son of former President Arturo Alessandri, narrowly defeated Salvador Allende in the 1958 election with 32% of the vote. Representing a coalition of conservatives and liberals, Alessandri was seen as a pragmatic technocrat rather than a traditional politician.


His presidency coincided with major challenges, including economic instability and natural disasters. The 1960 Great Chilean Earthquake, the most powerful earthquake ever recorded, devastated southern Chile, causing thousands of deaths and widespread destruction. The recovery effort required international aid, which came with conditions, including Chile's participation in John F. Kennedy's Alliance for Progress. This partnership initiated land reforms and set the stage for broader socio-economic changes.


Alessandri's economic policies focused on curbing inflation and fostering growth, but strikes by copper miners, teachers, and public workers reflected widespread dissatisfaction. Despite these challenges, Chile successfully hosted the 1962 FIFA World Cup, boosting national morale.


The 1963 municipal elections signaled a shift in political power. Alessandri's coalition lost ground to the Christian Democrats and the leftist FRAP alliance, which consolidated the Socialist and Communist Parties. This realignment set the stage for greater polarization in Chilean politics.


Legacy of the Era

The period between 1952 and 1964 marked the rise of mass politics in Chile, with women’s suffrage, the emergence of centrist forces, and the increasing prominence of leftist movements reshaping the political landscape. While Ibáñez's and Alessandri's administrations struggled with economic and social unrest, they laid the groundwork for the sweeping changes of the following decades. The nation's economic transition and the growing demands of its people for representation and reform highlighted the challenges of governing a rapidly modernizing society.

Valdivia Earthquake

1960 May 22

Valdivia, Chile

Valdivia Earthquake
Earthquake damage to good quality, wood-frame houses in Valdivia, Chile, 1960. © Pierre St. Amand

The 1960 Valdivia earthquake, the most powerful ever recorded, struck southern Chile on the afternoon of May 22, 1960. With a magnitude of 9.4–9.6 Mw, the earthquake lasted a staggering ten minutes, shaking an area stretching from Talca to Chiloé Island. Its effects rippled across the Pacific, triggering devastating tsunamis, landslides, and volcanic eruptions. The destruction left thousands dead and displaced, marking a turning point in Chile's history.


The quake originated from the Peru–Chile Trench, where the Nazca Plate subducts beneath the South American Plate, an area of immense seismic tension. This megathrust event released an unprecedented amount of energy, rupturing an 800-kilometer-long fault and causing an average displacement of 11 meters. The violent shaking and shallow depth of the quake caused widespread devastation in Chile and beyond.


In Valdivia, the earthquake reduced entire neighborhoods to rubble. Forty percent of the city's houses were destroyed, leaving tens of thousands homeless. The city’s flood barriers failed, submerging large areas as the Valdivia River swelled with sediment and debris. Roads, bridges, and public buildings were severely damaged, with the city’s hospital rendered unusable. Coastal towns like Corral and Queule were devastated, their harbors obliterated by tsunamis that followed the quake.


The tsunami’s impact was felt across the Pacific. Waves as high as 25 meters slammed into Chile’s coast, washing away fishing villages and small ports. Thousands of kilometers away, in Hilo, Hawaii, 61 people were killed when waves up to 10.7 meters swept inland. Japan, the Philippines, New Zealand, and even Australia experienced the tsunami’s deadly reach. Closer to the epicenter, submerged towns and stranded ships bore testament to the immense power of the ocean.


The quake caused numerous landslides in the Andes and coastal regions. The most catastrophic landslide blocked the outflow of Riñihue Lake, threatening to unleash a massive flood on downstream communities, including Valdivia. In a race against time, engineers and military personnel worked for weeks to construct channels to drain the rising waters, averting further disaster. This episode, known as the Riñihuazo, became a symbol of Chile’s resilience.


The disaster also triggered the eruption of Cordón Caulle, a volcanic vent in the Andes, just two days after the quake. Lava flows and ash deposits added to the chaos, though the sparsely populated region saw little loss of life from the eruption itself. For many, the eruption underscored the interconnectedness of geological events in this volatile region.


Recovery was slow and costly. The earthquake, tsunamis, and related disasters killed between 1,000 and 6,000 people and caused economic losses estimated at $400–800 million (equivalent to billions today). In Valdivia and other affected cities, entire blocks remained abandoned for decades. Rural areas, dependent on agriculture and fishing, faced enormous challenges as their lands were flooded and their boats destroyed. Yet the disaster also spurred significant reforms. Urban planning incorporated lessons from the quake, and international aid brought much-needed expertise and resources to the region.


The 1960 Valdivia earthquake remains a defining moment in Chile’s history. It reshaped the country’s landscapes, tested its resilience, and provided critical insights into disaster management. Decades later, its legacy endures in both the scars it left behind and the preparedness it inspired.

Montalva Era in Chile: Revolution in Liberty
President Eduardo Frei Montalva (1964–1970). © Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional

The 1964 presidential election marked a turning point in Chilean politics, with the emergence of the Christian Democrat Party as a dominant force. Eduardo Frei Montalva, the party's candidate, faced Salvador Allende of the leftist FRAP coalition and Julio Durán, representing the center-right. Amid fears of a Marxist victory in the context of Cold War tensions and United States opposition to Cuba's influence, the CIA spent millions to support Frei's campaign, leveraging anti-communist rhetoric. Frei triumphed with 56% of the vote, far outpacing Allende’s 39%, and assumed office on November 3, 1964.


Frei's administration was guided by his vision of a "Revolución en Libertad" ("Revolution in Liberty"), a series of reforms aimed at addressing inequality without resorting to Marxism. His government implemented significant social and economic changes. The agrarian reform, building on earlier efforts, sought to dismantle Chile’s entrenched system of latifundios—vast estates owned by a few elite families—by redistributing land to peasants and organizing them into syndicates. By 1970, Frei's government had expropriated over 1,400 estates, transferring 3.5 million hectares to rural workers, though much of this process remained incomplete.


Frei also expanded public education under his "Promoción Popular" initiative, aiming to reduce illiteracy and improve access to schooling. He established "Juntas de Vecinos" (neighborhood associations) to foster community engagement in governance and undertook educational reforms to modernize the curriculum and address Chile’s urbanizing population. Another milestone was granting full Chilean citizenship to the Rapa Nui of Easter Island in 1966, ending decades of isolation and inequality for the island’s residents.


Despite these achievements, Frei faced growing resistance. Leftist groups criticized the slow pace and limited scope of reforms, while right-wing factions denounced his policies as dangerously radical. Political polarization deepened, setting the stage for escalating conflicts in the years ahead.


Chilean Land Reform: Transforming the Countryside

The agrarian reform initiated during Frei’s presidency was part of a broader restructuring of Chile’s rural economy that had begun under Jorge Alessandri. Before the reforms, Chile’s agricultural sector was marked by inefficiency and inequality. Vast latifundios coexisted with impoverished minifundios—tiny plots that were insufficient for subsistence farming. The Catholic Church, the U.S. government through its Alliance for Progress, and Chilean politicians across the spectrum initially supported reform efforts to address these disparities.


Frei’s 1967 Agrarian Reform Law accelerated land redistribution, creating legal syndicates for peasants and expropriating estates deemed inefficient. By 1970, over 100,000 peasants were organized into unions, and significant land holdings were redistributed. These reforms not only dismantled the hacienda system but also aimed to improve agricultural productivity by fostering small-scale farming.


Legacy of Frei’s Presidency

Eduardo Frei Montalva’s government represented a centrist attempt to reconcile the demands for structural reform with the constraints of a market-oriented system. His policies, particularly the agrarian reform, laid the groundwork for profound changes in Chilean society. However, the reforms’ incomplete implementation and the growing influence of polarized political ideologies left the country on the brink of deeper conflict. By the end of his term, the divisions between left, center, and right had widened, setting the stage for the contentious presidential election of 1970.

Presidency of Salvador Allende

1970 Jan 1 - 1973 Sep 11

Chile

Presidency of Salvador Allende
Chileans marching in support of Allende. © James N. Wallace

Salvador Allende’s presidency marked a dramatic and controversial period in Chilean history, as the country embarked on an experiment in democratic socialism under the Popular Unity (Unidad Popular) coalition. Despite his moderate socialist stance, Allende’s term was characterized by intense polarization, economic upheaval, and ultimately, his violent ouster in a military coup on September 11, 1973.


Election and the "Chilean Way to Socialism"

In the 1970 election, Allende narrowly won with 36.2% of the vote against conservative Jorge Alessandri (34.9%) and Christian Democrat Radomiro Tomic (27.8%). In a system where no candidate received a majority, Congress ratified Allende’s presidency after he signed a "Statute of Constitutional Guarantees" to assure his commitment to democracy. His presidency marked the first time a Marxist leader was elected in a liberal democracy in Latin America.


Allende’s vision, dubbed "La vía chilena al socialismo" ("The Chilean Way to Socialism"), sought to implement socialism through democratic means. His policies included the full nationalization of key industries, such as copper mining, a continuation of agrarian reform, and ambitious social programs aimed at reducing inequality. Allende’s government also provided free milk to children and expanded public services, while integrating Chile's educational and healthcare systems into the state.


Economic Achievements and Challenges

Initially, the government’s policies yielded positive results. In 1971, Chile saw significant industrial growth, declining unemployment, and improved wages. The popular milk program provided 50% of children with free daily nutrition. However, inflation persisted, and nationalizing industries without adequate compensation or efficient management caused economic instability.


By 1972, the economy was in crisis. Falling copper prices—the backbone of Chile’s exports—and rising imports exacerbated fiscal deficits. Inflation surged, reaching hyperinflation levels. Shortages of basic goods and the emergence of black markets created widespread discontent. Allende attempted austerity measures, but these failed to stabilize the economy.


Political Polarization and Unrest

The Popular Unity coalition itself was fragmented, with moderates favoring gradual reforms and radicals advocating swift and often extralegal action. Tensions grew between Allende’s government and the conservative-dominated Congress, which increasingly aligned with the National Party and the Christian Democrats to block his initiatives. Right-wing opposition exploited economic instability and fears of a Marxist takeover.


Strikes and protests paralyzed the country, most notably the October 1972 truckers’ strike, supported covertly by the CIA. This strike crippled supply chains and disrupted daily life. Meanwhile, the far-left Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR) and other radical groups carried out illegal land and factory seizures, alarming middle-class Chileans and the military.


Foreign Interference and the U.S. Role

The United States, alarmed by the possibility of another socialist regime in the Western Hemisphere, took an active role in destabilizing Allende’s government. Following Allende’s election, the U.S. cut economic aid, pressured international institutions to deny Chile credit, and covertly funded opposition groups, including the truckers’ strike. Declassified CIA documents later revealed efforts to foment a coup and prevent Allende’s presidency from succeeding.


Road to the Coup

In June 1973, an attempted coup, known as the "Tanquetazo", was suppressed by constitutionalist military leaders like General Carlos Prats. However, tensions between the executive and the legislature reached a breaking point. In August 1973, the Chamber of Deputies passed a resolution accusing Allende’s government of constitutional violations and urging the military to act. Although Allende proposed a referendum to resolve the crisis, the military moved before this could occur.


1973 Coup and Allende’s Death

On September 11, 1973, General Augusto Pinochet led a military coup. La Moneda Palace, Chile’s presidential residence, was bombed, and Allende died by suicide after refusing to surrender. His death marked the end of Chile’s "Presidential Republic" (1925–1973) and ushered in Pinochet’s 17-year military dictatorship.


Legacy

Allende’s presidency remains a symbol of the possibilities and limits of democratic socialism. Supporters highlight his commitment to peaceful reform and social justice, while critics point to economic mismanagement and political turmoil. His overthrow is a pivotal moment in Cold War history, underscoring the impact of foreign intervention and internal divisions in shaping the fate of nations.

1973 Chilean coup d'état

1973 Sep 11

Chile

1973 Chilean coup d'état
The facilities of the National Stadium were used as a detention and torture center after the coup. © Ed. Fundamentos, Buenos Aires.

On September 11, 1973, Chilean President Salvador Allende’s democratically elected socialist government was overthrown in a military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. This marked a violent end to Chile’s 48-year history of constitutional democracy and ushered in a 17-year military dictatorship. The coup was supported, directly and indirectly, by international forces, including the United States, as part of Cold War geopolitical strategies.


Political and Economic Background

Allende, elected in 1970 under the Unidad Popular coalition, pursued a peaceful transition to socialism. His policies included nationalization of industries, land reform, and expanded social programs. However, these efforts deepened political polarization in Chile. A significant fiscal deficit, hyperinflation, and shortages of goods fueled discontent among the middle class, business elites, and parts of the working class.


The opposition, including the National Party and segments of the Christian Democrats, accused Allende of unconstitutional actions and creating a pathway to dictatorship. The U.S. government, wary of a second socialist regime in Latin America, worked covertly to destabilize Allende’s presidency through funding strikes, propaganda, and supporting opposition groups.


Military Tensions and Pre-Coup Developments

The Chilean military, traditionally apolitical, was increasingly influenced by anti-communist sentiment and dissatisfaction with economic and social instability. By 1973, the military high command, led by Pinochet, had begun planning Allende’s removal.


In August 1973, the Chamber of Deputies passed a resolution accusing Allende of breaching the constitution and called on the military to "restore constitutional order." Allende dismissed these claims, accusing the opposition of inciting a coup.


The situation escalated with strikes, most notably the truckers’ strike, which paralyzed transportation and distribution networks. The military's discontent grew, and senior officers increasingly viewed Allende's government as a threat to Chile's stability.


The Coup of September 11, 1973

In the early hours of September 11, 1973, the military launched coordinated operations across Chile. The Navy captured Valparaíso, while the Army secured key locations in Santiago. Radio and television stations were shut down, and military leaders issued a statement declaring their takeover to "protect Chile from Marxist tyranny."


President Allende, aware of the coup, made his way to the presidential palace, La Moneda, with a small group of loyal bodyguards. He refused offers of safe passage for exile and delivered a farewell address to the nation, vowing to remain at his post and defend Chilean democracy.


At 11:00 AM, the Chilean Air Force bombed La Moneda, followed by an infantry assault. Surrounded and outnumbered, Allende reportedly died by suicide in the palace at around 2:00 PM. His final words, broadcast on radio, expressed hope for Chile's future and commitment to democracy.


Aftermath of the Coup

Pinochet quickly emerged as the leader of the four-man military junta, which dissolved Congress, banned political parties, and suspended constitutional rights. The junta established a dictatorship that would last until 1990. Pinochet was officially declared president in 1974 and initiated policies to suppress dissent and implement neoliberal economic reforms.


Human Rights Abuses

The coup and subsequent dictatorship were marked by brutal repression. Thousands of Allende supporters, including politicians, labor leaders, and intellectuals, were arrested, tortured, and executed. The National Stadium in Santiago became a detention and torture center. An estimated 40,000 people were tortured, and at least 3,000 were killed or disappeared during Pinochet’s rule.


International Reactions

The coup drew condemnation and concern from much of the world. However, it was supported by several governments, including the United States, which had covertly worked to destabilize Allende’s presidency. Newly declassified documents revealed that the Nixon administration was aware of the coup plans and had created conditions to facilitate it.


Legacy

The 1973 coup remains a contentious topic in Chilean history. For supporters, it was a necessary intervention to prevent chaos and establish order. For critics, it was a tragic betrayal of democracy and the beginning of a repressive regime. The events of September 11, 1973, and the ensuing dictatorship left deep scars on Chilean society, shaping its political and social trajectory for decades.

Military Dictatorship of Pinochet

1973 Sep 11 - 1990

Chile

Military Dictatorship of Pinochet
U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger with Pinochet in 1976. © Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Chile

The military dictatorship in Chile, lasting from 1973 to 1990, was a transformative and brutal era in the country’s history. It began on September 11, 1973, with a coup led by General Augusto Pinochet, which overthrew President Salvador Allende's democratically elected government. Pinochet consolidated power in the aftermath, ushering in a regime marked by human rights abuses, significant economic shifts, and deep societal scars.


Seizure of Power

Economic instability and political polarization under Allende’s presidency created fertile ground for the coup. Inflation soared to 600% by early 1973, and a series of strikes by various groups, including truck owners and copper workers, paralyzed the economy. With support from the United States, which sought to prevent a socialist regime in the region, the Chilean military staged the coup. Allende, surrounded at La Moneda Palace as it was bombarded by the military, reportedly committed suicide rather than surrender.


In the aftermath, a military junta led by Pinochet dissolved Congress, banned political parties, and suspended civil liberties. Pinochet soon emerged as the dominant figure in the junta, declaring himself president in 1974.


Human Rights Violations

The early years of the dictatorship were marked by severe repression. Political opponents, particularly members of leftist parties, faced arrest, torture, and execution. The Caravan of Death, a military operation in October 1973, resulted in the murder of at least 72 people. Over the course of the dictatorship, an estimated 3,200 people were killed or disappeared, while tens of thousands were imprisoned and tortured. The National Stadium in Santiago became a grim symbol of this repression, serving as a detention and torture center for thousands.


The regime also targeted perceived dissidents, including labor leaders and students, while the Catholic Church emerged as a prominent voice against these abuses. Organizations such as the Vicariate of Solidarity worked to document human rights violations and provide support to victims.


Economic Transformation

Pinochet's government undertook sweeping economic reforms, guided by a group of free-market economists known as the "Chicago Boys." The regime embraced neoliberal policies, including deregulation, privatization, and trade liberalization. These reforms aimed to reverse the nationalization efforts of the Allende administration and integrate Chile into the global economy.


Initially, the reforms caused significant hardship. Unemployment soared to over 20% during the 1982 economic crisis, and social spending was drastically reduced. Many industries were privatized, and foreign investment was encouraged. By the mid-1980s, under the leadership of Finance Minister Hernán Büchi, the economy began to recover, achieving annual GDP growth of nearly 6% from 1984 to 1990. Chile’s export economy, particularly in agriculture, flourished, but income inequality widened, and social services remained underfunded.


Consolidation of Power

Pinochet ruled with an iron grip, enacting a new constitution in 1980 through a controversial plebiscite. The constitution granted him an eight-year presidential term and established mechanisms to prolong military influence. Despite claims of legitimacy, the process was widely criticized as undemocratic.


Internal conflicts within the junta also shaped the regime. Pinochet clashed with other junta members, such as Air Force General Gustavo Leigh, over the concentration of power in his hands. Leigh was eventually dismissed in 1978, and Pinochet’s dominance over the government remained unchallenged.


Opposition and Transition

Resistance to the dictatorship took many forms, from peaceful protests to armed resistance by groups like the Revolutionary Left Movement (MIR) and the Manuel Rodríguez Patriotic Front (FPMR). The FPMR notably attempted to assassinate Pinochet in 1986, though the effort failed. Throughout the 1980s, protests against the regime grew, fueled by economic inequality and ongoing repression.


In 1988, a national plebiscite was held, as mandated by the 1980 constitution, to decide whether Pinochet would remain in power. Despite the regime’s control over the process, 55% of voters rejected an extension of his rule. This result led to democratic elections in 1989, with Patricio Aylwin of the Christian Democratic Party elected president.


Legacy

The dictatorship formally ended in 1990, but its legacy persisted. The 1980 constitution remained in effect, and the military retained significant autonomy. Human rights abuses were gradually acknowledged through truth commissions, such as the Rettig and Valech reports, which documented the regime’s crimes and the experiences of its victims. The economic policies of the dictatorship laid the foundation for Chile’s modern economy but also entrenched social inequalities.


Pinochet’s regime left a profound impact on Chile, shaping its political, economic, and social structures for decades. It remains a subject of intense debate, reflecting the deep divisions it created within Chilean society.

Concertacion Coalition: Transition to Democracy
Pinochet congratulates new President Patricio Aylwin on inauguration day, 11 March 1990. © Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional - Chile

After the military dictatorship ended in 1990, Chile entered a new era of democracy under the leadership of the Concertación coalition.


Transition to Democracy: The Aylwin Administration (1990–1994)

Patricio Aylwin, the first democratically elected president after the Pinochet era, assumed office on March 11, 1990. His administration focused on rebuilding democratic institutions, fostering national reconciliation, and addressing the human rights abuses committed during the dictatorship. Aylwin’s government worked within the constraints of a constitution that still bore authoritarian elements, while facing opposition from a military that retained significant influence.


One of Aylwin’s most notable achievements was the establishment of the National Commission for Truth and Reconciliation, which produced the Rettig Report. The report documented over 2,000 cases of political killings and disappearances during the dictatorship. While Aylwin called for justice, his administration took a cautious approach, balancing the need for accountability with maintaining stability in a society still polarized by recent history.


On the economic front, Aylwin adopted policies that maintained the free-market framework established during the dictatorship but sought to reduce inequality. Social spending increased significantly, with programs targeting education, health, and housing for the poorest Chileans. Between 1990 and 1994, poverty rates dropped from nearly 40% to under 30%. Aylwin’s leadership marked the beginning of a robust democratic tradition in Chile, and his government laid the groundwork for continued economic and social progress.


Economic Modernization: The Frei Ruiz-Tagle Administration (1994–2000)

Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle, son of former President Eduardo Frei Montalva, succeeded Aylwin in 1994. His administration emphasized infrastructure development, economic diversification, and international trade as key pillars of Chile’s modernization. Frei prioritized investments in highways, ports, and telecommunications, transforming Chile into a more competitive global player.


Frei’s administration expanded Chile’s trade relations, negotiating free trade agreements with Canada, Mexico, and the European Union, while also joining Mercosur as an associate member. These initiatives reinforced Chile’s export-oriented economy, particularly in industries like copper, wine, and agriculture. By the late 1990s, Chile had solidified its reputation as one of Latin America’s most open and stable economies.


Despite these achievements, the Asian financial crisis of 1997–1998 posed significant challenges, causing economic growth to slow and unemployment to rise. Frei’s administration responded with fiscal measures that stabilized the economy, allowing Chile to recover more quickly than many of its neighbors. On the social front, Frei increased spending on education and healthcare but faced criticism for not doing enough to address persistent inequality.


Social Progress and International Expansion: The Lagos Administration (2000–2006)

Ricardo Lagos, elected in 2000, was Chile’s first Socialist president since Salvador Allende. Lagos balanced a progressive social agenda with market-oriented economic policies, consolidating Chile’s status as a model of democratic governance and economic success in Latin America.


A cornerstone of Lagos’s presidency was Chile Solidario, a groundbreaking anti-poverty program that provided targeted assistance to the most vulnerable families. Under his leadership, the government also implemented the AUGE healthcare system, guaranteeing coverage for a list of priority medical conditions, significantly expanding access to healthcare for lower-income Chileans.


Internationally, Lagos advanced Chile’s integration into the global economy. His administration signed free trade agreements with the United States, South Korea, the European Union, and China, among others. These agreements helped diversify Chile’s export markets and strengthened its economy, which grew at an average annual rate of over 4% during his presidency.


Lagos also pursued significant political reforms, including the 2005 overhaul of the 1980 Constitution. These reforms eliminated appointed senators and strengthened civilian control over the military, marking the final dismantling of institutional remnants from the Pinochet era. By the end of Lagos’s term, poverty had declined to below 20%, and Chile was widely regarded as one of the most stable and prosperous nations in Latin America.


Broader Impact of the Concertación Administrations (1990–2006)

The three administrations of the Concertación coalition between 1990 and 2006 transformed Chile into a model of political and economic stability. The governments combined free-market economic policies with targeted social programs, achieving steady growth while reducing poverty. By 2006, Chile’s poverty rate had dropped from nearly 40% in 1990 to under 14%.


Democratic institutions were gradually strengthened, culminating in the 2005 constitutional reforms that removed the last vestiges of the dictatorship’s influence. Chile became a respected voice in international forums, known for its commitment to free trade, fiscal responsibility, and human rights. The country’s success during this period laid the foundation for ongoing debates about inequality, social justice, and economic growth in subsequent administrations.

Presidencies of Bachelet & Pinera: Shaping Modern Chile
Michelle Bachelet visits Sebastián Piñera , after the 2010 presidential elections. © Sebastián Piñera E.

Chile’s democratic transition ushered in a period of political stability dominated by the Concertación coalition, which governed the country for two decades. In January 2006, Chile made history by electing Michelle Bachelet, the nation’s first female president. A member of the Socialist Party, Bachelet took office on March 11, 2006, extending the Concertación’s leadership. Her presidency continued the coalition’s commitment to free trade, further integrating Chile into the global economy.


Michelle Bachelet’s First Term: Trade and Social Reforms

Under Bachelet’s leadership, Chile advanced its position as a regional trade hub. She oversaw the implementation of several free trade agreements initiated by her predecessor, Ricardo Lagos. These included deals with China, Japan, and India, and a groundbreaking partnership with the European Union. Chile also became the first Latin American nation to sign a free trade agreement with China, reflecting its expanding economic horizons. Bachelet additionally ratified the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership (P4) with New Zealand, Singapore, and Brunei, further bolstering international trade ties.


Domestically, Bachelet aimed to address social inequalities while managing Chile’s economic growth. However, challenges such as public discontent with education and healthcare systems highlighted the limits of progress.


Sebastián Piñera’s First Term: Crisis and Recovery

In 2010, after 20 years of center-left governance, Chile turned to Sebastián Piñera, a billionaire businessman from the center-right. Piñera defeated former president Eduardo Frei in a contentious runoff election. His presidency began amidst a devastating crisis: the 8.8-magnitude earthquake that struck on February 27, 2010. This catastrophic event killed over 500 people and displaced more than a million. Damage estimates reached between $15 billion and $30 billion, equivalent to up to 15% of Chile’s GDP.


Piñera’s administration managed the recovery efforts with notable efficiency, though the scale of destruction posed immense challenges. Later that year, Chile achieved global acclaim with the miraculous rescue of 33 miners trapped in the San José mine. The miners, trapped 700 meters underground for 69 days, were brought to the surface in a globally televised operation, symbolizing Chilean resilience and ingenuity.


Despite economic stability, Piñera’s presidency faced mounting public dissatisfaction. Protests erupted over education reforms, demanding fairer and more accessible systems. This unrest contributed to a sharp decline in Piñera’s approval ratings.


Michelle Bachelet’s Return: Reform and Scandal

In 2013, Michelle Bachelet returned to power, this time with a renewed mandate for reform. Her agenda sought to address the social demands that had intensified during the preceding years. Key priorities included overhauling the education system, implementing tax reforms, legalizing same-sex civil unions, and abolishing the Binomial System, a vestige of Pinochet-era electoral rules that had limited political representation.


While her second term aimed to foster greater equality, it was marred by corruption scandals that undermined public trust in both the political and business elite. The Penta case, involving campaign finance irregularities, and the Caval case, which implicated Bachelet’s son, cast a shadow over her administration.


Sebastián Piñera’s Second Term: Division and Crisis

In 2017, Sebastián Piñera reclaimed the presidency, defeating Alejandro Guillier, a journalist and representative of Bachelet’s Nueva Mayoría coalition. Piñera’s second term, beginning in 2018, was marked by deepening political polarization and social unrest. His government struggled to address mounting inequality, culminating in the Estallido Social protests of 2019, a period of upheaval demanding systemic reforms.


Legacy of the Bachelet and Piñera Eras

The alternating presidencies of Bachelet and Piñera reflect a divided Chile, grappling with the legacy of dictatorship and the challenges of modernization. While Bachelet’s tenure emphasized progressive social change and global integration, Piñera’s leadership navigated crises and sought to stabilize the economy. Together, their administrations encapsulate the tensions between continuity and change in a rapidly evolving nation.

2010 Chile Earthquake

2010 Feb 27

Chile

2010 Chile Earthquake
In Concepción, the 20-story Alto Río building collapsed as a result of the earthquake on February 27, 2010. © Claudio Núñez

On February 27, 2010, a powerful 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of central Chile at 3:34 a.m. local time. This megathrust quake, caused by the subduction of the Nazca Plate beneath the South American Plate, was one of the strongest in recorded history. Lasting over three minutes, the earthquake and its subsequent tsunami devastated vast regions of the country, impacting 80% of Chile’s population.


The earthquake triggered a tsunami with waves as high as 24.1 meters (79 feet), devastating coastal towns such as Talcahuano and Dichato. The tsunami also reached as far as Japan, California, and the Tōhoku region, where it caused additional damage.


Damage and Casualties

The disaster claimed 525 lives, with 25 people reported missing. Approximately 370,000 homes were damaged or destroyed, leaving tens of thousands homeless. The economic cost was estimated at $15–30 billion. Critical infrastructure, including roads, bridges, hospitals, and airports, sustained significant damage. Santiago's international airport was temporarily closed, and many hospitals in central and southern Chile were rendered unusable.


In Concepción, a newly constructed 15-story residential building, "Alto Río," collapsed, trapping dozens of residents. The city also faced fires, infrastructure collapse, and widespread power outages. Coastal towns bore the brunt of the tsunami, which destroyed entire neighborhoods, displaced fishing boats, and washed away infrastructure.


Emergency Response

President Michelle Bachelet declared a "state of catastrophe," deploying military troops to restore order and assist in relief efforts. Communication breakdowns, logistical challenges, and slow government response drew criticism in the days following the quake. Looting in Concepción and other cities added to the chaos, prompting the imposition of curfews.


International aid flowed in as Chile grappled with recovery. The Swiss Reinsurance Company and Munich Re AG estimated insurance industry losses between $4 and $7 billion. Reconstruction efforts began almost immediately, focusing on housing, infrastructure repair, and disaster preparedness.


Lessons Learned

The 2010 Chile earthquake underscored the country’s vulnerability to seismic events despite its robust building codes and preparedness. Chile’s stringent construction standards, introduced after the catastrophic 1960 Valdivia earthquake, saved many lives. However, the event exposed gaps in tsunami warning systems, emergency communication, and disaster management, prompting reforms in these areas.


The earthquake's legacy is reflected in Chile's continued commitment to seismic resilience and its role as a global leader in earthquake engineering and disaster response planning. The tragedy remains a poignant reminder of the country's place along one of the world’s most active tectonic boundaries.

2010 Copiapo Mining Accident

2010 Aug 5

Copiapó, Copiapo, Chile

2010 Copiapo Mining Accident
Piñera holds the message sent by the miners alongside Mining Minister Golborne (red jacket, blue shirt). © Gobierno de Chile

Video

On August 5, 2010, disaster struck the San José copper-gold mine in Chile’s Atacama Desert. A collapse trapped 33 miners 700 meters (2,300 feet) underground, marking the start of an ordeal that lasted 69 days. Against all odds, the miners’ dramatic rescue became a global symbol of resilience, teamwork, and technological ingenuity.


Collapse and Initial Response

The San José mine, notorious for its unsafe conditions, was owned by the San Esteban Mining Company. Years of neglected safety warnings culminated in a massive cave-in at 2:00 p.m. local time. While one miner escaped, 33 others were sealed inside. They sought refuge in a designated emergency shelter, but the mine’s failure to install required safety ladders thwarted escape attempts.


Rescue teams quickly mobilized, drilling exploratory boreholes in an attempt to locate the miners. Days stretched into weeks without success, and concerns grew over the possibility of further collapses. On August 22, after 17 days of uncertainty, a drill finally reached the refuge. A note taped to the drill bit read, “Estamos bien en el refugio los 33” (“We are well in the shelter, the 33 of us”). This message sparked hope across Chile and the world.


Life Underground: Survival and Leadership

For over two weeks, the miners rationed the shelter’s emergency supplies, intended to last only a few days. Shift supervisor Luis Urzúa emerged as the group’s leader, organizing daily tasks and maintaining order. Decisions were made democratically, with everyone having a voice. Each man supported his comrades during moments of despair, forging a strong sense of unity.


The miners endured extreme heat, humidity, and darkness, relying on minimal water sources and food rations. When communication was established, rescuers sent supplies through small boreholes, including cameras, medical kits, and letters from family members. Video footage showed the miners’ resilience, with Mario Sepúlveda, dubbed “Super Mario,” hosting energetic updates to boost morale. Religious faith also played a critical role, with daily prayers and makeshift shrines offering spiritual sustenance.


Rescue Plan: Ingenuity and Collaboration

The rescue operation, nicknamed Operación San Lorenzo after the patron saint of miners, became a global collaboration. NASA provided expertise on psychological health and environmental challenges, while companies worldwide contributed technology and equipment.


Three drilling strategies were employed, designated as Plans A, B, and C. The breakthrough came with Plan B, using a Schramm T130 drill. On October 9, the rescue shaft was completed, paving the way for the miners’ extraction. A specially designed capsule, the Fénix 2, equipped with oxygen, cameras, and safety features, was used to bring the miners to the surface.


Rescue: Triumph and Relief

On October 12, 2010, the rescue began. The first miner, Florencio Ávalos, ascended to the surface to jubilant cheers. Over the next 24 hours, the remaining 32 miners followed, each emerging to the embrace of family and the applause of the world. President Sebastián Piñera greeted every miner, celebrating their survival as a symbol of Chilean resilience. The final ascent was made by Luis Urzúa, who handed over leadership to Piñera, saying, “I deliver the shift as promised.”


The rescue captivated millions globally, with an estimated 5.3 million viewers watching live. The operation required 39 round trips by the Fénix 2 capsule, which traveled a total of 50 kilometers (31 miles). Despite the prolonged entrapment, all 33 miners were in remarkably good health, thanks to the disciplined efforts of both the men underground and the rescuers above.


Legacy and Impact

The Copiapó mining accident prompted national and international scrutiny of mine safety regulations. In Chile, President Piñera overhauled the mining safety agency, shutting down numerous unsafe operations. The rescue also elevated Chile’s global standing, showcasing its technological expertise and humanitarian spirit.


The miners, celebrated as “Los 33,” became symbols of hope and perseverance. Their story inspired books, documentaries, and the 2015 film The 33. While the physical rescue was complete, the emotional and psychological recovery of the miners was an ongoing journey.

2019–2022 Chilean Protests

2019 Oct 1 - 2022

Chile

2019–2022 Chilean Protests
Protesters in Plaza Baquedano on 22 October. © Carlos Figueroa

Video

From October 2019 to early 2022, Chile witnessed a period of intense civil unrest known as the Estallido Social ("Social Outburst"). Sparked by a modest fare hike for the Santiago Metro, these protests evolved into a nationwide movement against entrenched social inequality, rising costs of living, and the privatization of key public services. The movement culminated in a process to rewrite the country's dictatorship-era constitution, marking one of the most transformative periods in modern Chilean history.


Origins and Escalation

The protests began on October 7, 2019, with a fare evasion campaign led by high school students. By mid-October, the demonstrations escalated as citizens vandalized and set fire to metro stations, disabling Santiago's critical transportation system. On October 18, the government declared a state of emergency and imposed curfews, deploying military forces to the streets for the first time since Augusto Pinochet's dictatorship.


President Sebastián Piñera initially referred to the unrest as a "war against a powerful enemy," a statement widely criticized for its inflammatory tone. Protests spread to cities like Valparaíso, Concepción, and Antofagasta, often accompanied by rioting, looting, and destruction of public infrastructure. By late October, over a million people marched in Santiago, demanding systemic reforms and Piñera’s resignation.


Social Demands and Government Response

The protests brought longstanding grievances to the forefront. Despite decades of economic growth, Chile remained one of Latin America's most unequal countries, with stark disparities in wealth, access to education, healthcare, and pensions. Protesters demanded:


  • Improved wages and pensions
  • Affordable healthcare and education
  • Reversals of privatization policies
  • Resignation of President Piñera
  • A new constitution


On October 22, 2019, Piñera apologized for failing to address public demands and announced a "New Social Agenda," including increases in pensions, reduced electricity tariffs, and higher taxes on the wealthy. However, these concessions were criticized as inadequate.


The protests continued, with major demonstrations, including the "Biggest March in Chile’s History" on October 25, when 1.2 million people gathered in Santiago alone.


The Agreement for Peace and a New Constitution

In November 2019, the Chilean Congress reached a historic agreement to hold a national plebiscite on whether to draft a new constitution. This step was seen as a critical response to the protests, aiming to address deep-rooted inequality enshrined in the 1980 Constitution created during Pinochet's regime.


On October 25, 2020, 78% of voters approved the drafting of a new constitution. Elections in May 2021 selected a diverse Constitutional Convention, with indigenous representatives, activists, and independent candidates playing a significant role.


Violence, Human Rights Violations, and Public Costs

The protests were marred by significant violence and allegations of human rights abuses. Organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch accused Chilean security forces of excessive force, torture, sexual violence, and arbitrary detentions. Protest symbols, such as bandaged eyes, highlighted the brutality of state responses.


The economic impact was also severe. Damages to public and private infrastructure, including the Santiago Metro, were estimated at $3.5 billion, with 300,000 jobs lost.


Pandemic and Waning Momentum

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly subdued the protests, as lockdowns and social distancing measures limited large gatherings. Nevertheless, sporadic demonstrations continued in key areas like Plaza Baquedano, where activists demanded the release of the so-called "Prisoners of the Revolt." The government's perceived mishandling of these protests further fueled tensions.


Constitutional Plebiscite and New Political Leadership

Gabriel Boric, a former student activist, won the 2021 presidential election on a platform aligned with the protest movement's demands. He defeated far-right candidate José Antonio Kast with 56% of the vote, becoming Chile’s youngest president.


Under Boric's administration, a new constitution was drafted and put to a referendum on September 4, 2022. However, the proposed constitution, which included progressive provisions on indigenous rights, gender equality, and environmental protections, was rejected by 62% of voters, reflecting a lack of consensus on its contents.


Legacy of the Social Outburst

The 2019–2022 protests left an indelible mark on Chilean society. They forced the nation to confront systemic inequality and opened debates about the role of neoliberalism in its economic model. While the constitutional process remains unresolved, the movement demonstrated the power of grassroots activism in reshaping political priorities.


The Estallido Social revealed both the resilience of Chilean democracy and the deep fractures within its social fabric, setting the stage for continued efforts to build a more inclusive and equitable society.

Appendices


APPENDIX 1

Why The Vast Majority Of All Chileans Live Near Its Capital

APPENDIX

Chile - History, Geography, Economy and Culture

Footnotes


  1. Dillehay, Tom D.; Ocampo, Carlos; Saavedra, José; Sawakuchi, Andre Oliveira; Vega, Rodrigo M.; Pino, Mario; Collins, Michael B.; Scott Cummings, Linda; Arregui, Iván; Villagran, Ximena S.; Hartmann, Gelvam A. (2015-11-18). "New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile". PLOS ONE. 10 (11): e0141923. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1041923D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141923. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 4651426. PMID 26580202.
  2. Bengoa, Jose (2000). Historia del pueblo mapuche: Siglos XIX y XX (in Spanish) (Seventh ed.). LOM Ediciones. ISBN 978-956-282-232-9, pp. 16-19.

References


  • Amunategui, Miguel Luis (1913). Descubrimiento i conquista de Chile (PDF) (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta, Litografia i Encuadernacion Barcelona. p. 550. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  • Antezana-Pernet, Corinne. "Peace in the World and Democracy at Home: The Chilean Women's Movement in the 1940s" in Latin America in the 1940s, David Rock, ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1994, pp. 166-186.
  • Barros Arana, Diego (1855). Historia Jeneral de la Independencia de Chile (in Spanish). Vol. I-IV. Santiago, Chile: Imprenta del Ferrocarril.
  • Barros Arana, Diego (1884-1902). Historia Jeneral de Chile (in Spanish). Vol. I-XVI. Santiago, Chile: Rafael Jover. ISBN 9780598482334.
  • Bergquist, Charles W. Labor in Latin America: Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela, and Colombia. Stanford: Stanford University Press 1986.
  • Bulnes, Gonzalo (1955). La Guerra del Pacifico (in Spanish) (5th ed.). Santiago, Chile: Editorial del Pacifico.
  • Burr, Robert N. By Reason or Force: Chile and the Balancing Power of South America 1830-1905. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1965.
  • Carvallo y Goyeneche, Vicente (1875). Miguel Luis Amunategui (ed.). Descripcion Historica y Geografia del Reino de Chile Vol. I (1542-1626). Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. VIII (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta de La Estrella de Chile.
  • Carvallo y Goyeneche, Vicente (1875). Miguel Luis Amunategui (ed.). Descripcion Historica y Geografia del Reino de Chile Vol. II (1626-1787). Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. IX (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta de La Estrella de Chile. p. 483.
  • Carvallo y Goyeneche, Vicente (1875). Miguel Luis Amunategui (ed.). Descripcion Historica y Geografia del Reino de Chile Vol. III. Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. X (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta de La Estrella de Chile.
  • Castedo, Leopoldo (1954). Resumen de la Historia de Chile de Francisco Antonio Encina (in Spanish). Vol. 2. Santiago, Chile: Empresa Editora Zig-Zag.
  • Collier, Simon; William F. Sater (1994). A History of Chile: 1808-1994. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Collier, Simon. Ideas and Politics of Chilean Independence, 1808-1833. New York: Cambridge University Press 1967.
  • Cordoba y Figueroa, Pedro de (1862). Historia de Chile (1492-1717). Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. II (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta del Ferrocarril.
  • Cronologia de Chile in the Spanish-language Wikipedia.
  • Crow, John A (1992). The Epic of Latin America (4th ed.). New York: University of California Press. pp. 331-333.
  • Cruz Farias, Eduardo (2002). "An overview of the Mapuche and Aztec military response to the Spanish Conquest". Archived from the original on 6 April 2004. Retrieved 15 October 2008.
  • Diaz, J.; Lüders. R. y Wagner, G. (2016). Chile 1810-2010. La Republica en Cifras. Historical Statistics. (Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Catolica de Chile); a compendium of indicators, from macroeconomic aggregates to demographic trends and social policies, focused on economic and social history; more information; Data can be obtained from: online
  • Drake, Paul; et al. (1994). Chile: A Country Study. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress.
  • Drake, Paul. "International Crises and Popular Movements in Latin America: Chile and Peru from the Great Depression to the Cold War," in Latin America in the 1940s, David Rock, ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1994, 109-140.
  • Drake, Paul. Socialism and Populism in Chile, 1932-1952. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1978.
  • Encina, Francisco Antonio (1940-1952). Historia de Chile: desde la prehistoria hasta 1891 (in Spanish). Vol. I-XX. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Nascimento.
  • Ercilla, Alonso de. La Araucana (in Spanish). Eswikisource.
  • Eyzaguirre, Jose Ignacio Victor (1850). Historia eclesiastica: Politica y literaria de Chile (in Spanish). Valparaiso, Chile: Imprenta del Comercio.
  • Faundez, Julio (1988). Marxism and democracy in Chile: From 1932 to the fall of Allende. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  • Gay, Claudio (1845). Historia fisica y politica de Chile (1564-1638) (in Spanish). Vol. II. Paris, France: En casa del autor.
  • Gay, Claudio (1847). Historia fisica y politica de Chile (1638-1716) (in Spanish). Vol. III. Paris, France: En casa del autor.
  • Gay, Claudio (1848). Historia fisica y politica de Chile (1749-1808) (in Spanish). Vol. IV. Paris, France: En casa del autor. p. 506.
  • Gay, Claudio (1856). Historia de la Independencia Chilena (in Spanish). Vol. I & II. Paris, France: Imprenta de E. Thunot y Cia.
  • Gomez de Vidaurre, Felipe (1889). Jose Toribio Medina (ed.). Historia Geografica, Natural y Civil del Reino de Chile Vol. II. Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. XV (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Ercilla.
  • Gongora Marmolejo, Alonso de (1960). Historia de Todas las Cosas que han Acaecido en el Reino de Chile y de los que lo han gobernado (1536-1575). Cronicas del Reino de Chile (in Spanish). Madrid, Spain: Atlas. pp. 75-224.
  • Gonzalez Camus, Ignacio (1988). El dia en que murio Allende (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Instituto Chileno de Estudios Humanisticos (ICHEH) and Centro de Estudios Sociales (CESOC).
  • Gonzalez de Najera, Alonso (1866). Desengano y reparo de la guerra del Reino de Chile. Coleccion de Documentos Ineditos para la Historia de Espana (in Spanish). Vol. XLVIII. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta de la Viuda de Calero. Retrieved 2013-09-18. History of Chile (1425-1655)
  • Harvey, Robert. "Liberators: Latin America`s Struggle For Independence, 1810-1830". John Murray, London (2000). ISBN 0-7195-5566-3
  • Herring, Hubert (1968). A History of Latin America. New York: Alfred A Knopf.
  • Jufre del aguila, Melchor (1897). Compendio historial del Descubrimiento y Conquista del Reino de Chile (in Spanish) (Universidad de Chile ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Cervantes.
  • Karamessines, Thomas (1970). Operation Guide for the Conspiration in Chile. Washington, D.C.: United States National Security Council. Archived from the original on 2006-11-01. Retrieved 2009-04-12.
  • Kaufman, Edy (1988). Crisis in Allende's Chile: New Perspectives. New York: Praeger Publishers.
  • Klubock, Thomas. La Frontera: Forests and Ecological Conflict in Chile's Frontier Territory. Durham: Duke University Press 2014.
  • Korth, Eugene E (1968). Spanish Policy in Colonial Chile: the Struggle for Social Justice, 1535-1700. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Lovemen, Brian. Chile: The Legacy of Hispanic Capitalism (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Mallon, Florencia. Courage Tastes of Blood: The Mapuche Community of Nicolas Ailio and the Chilean State, 1906-2001. Durham: Duke University Press 2005.
  • Marino de Lobera, Pedro (1960). Fr. Bartolome de Escobar (ed.). Cronica del Reino de Chile, escrita por el capitan Pedro Marino de Lobera... reducido a nuevo metodo y estilo por el Padre Bartolome de Escobar (1593). Cronicas del Reino de Chile (in Spanish). Madrid, Spain: Atlas. pp. 227-562.
  • Medina, Jose Toribio (1906). Diccionario Biografico Colonial de Chile (PDF) (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Elzeviriana. pp. 1, 006. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  • Perez Garcia, Jose (1900). Jose Toribio Medina (ed.). Historia Natural, Militar, Civil y Sagrada del Reino de Chile (Vol. I) (PDF). Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. XXII (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Elzeviriana. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  • Perez Garcia, Jose (1900). Jose Toribio Medina (ed.). Historia Natural, Militar, Civil y Sagrada del Reino de Chile (Vol. II) (PDF). Coleccion de historiadores de Chile y documentos relativos a la historia nacional (in Spanish). Vol. XXIII (Instituto Chileno de Cultura Hispanica, Academia Chilena de la Historia ed.). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Elzeviriana. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  • Pike, Frederick B. Chile and the United States, 1880-1962: The Emergence of Chile's Social Crisis and challenge to United States Diplomacy. University of Notre Dame Press 1963.
  • Prago, Albert (1970). The Revolutions in Spanish America. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  • Rector, John L (2005). The History of Chile. US: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rosales, Diego de (1877). Benjamin Vicuna Mackenna (ed.). Historia general de el Reyno de Chile: Flandes Indiano (1425-1553) (in Spanish). Vol. I. Valparaiso, Chile: Imprenta i Libreria del Mercurio.
  • Rosales, Diego de (1878). Benjamin Vicuna Mackenna (ed.). Historia general de el Reyno de Chile: Flandes Indiano (1554-1625) (in Spanish). Vol. II. Valparaiso, Chile: Imprenta i Libreria del Mercurio.
  • Rosales, Diego de (1878). Benjamin Vicuna Mackenna (ed.). Historia general de el Reyno de Chile: Flandes Indiano (1625-1655) (in Spanish). Vol. III. Valparaiso, Chile: Imprenta i Libreria del Mercurio.
  • Stern, Steve J. Battling for Hearts and Minds: Memory Struggles in Pinochet's Chile, 1973-1988. Durham: Duke University Press 2006.
  • US State Department. "Background Note: Chile" (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 January 2009.
  • Valdivia, Pedro de (1960). Cartas. Cronicas del Reino de Chile (in Spanish). Madrid, Spain: Atlas. pp. 1-74.
  • Vega, Garcilaso de la (1616). Comentarios reales (in Spanish). Eswikisource.
  • Vicuna Mackenna, Benjamin (1868). La guerra a muerte: memoria sobre las ultimas campanas de la Independencia de Chile (1819-1824) (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Nacional. pp. 562.
  • Vicuna Mackenna, Benjamin (1889). Diego de Almagro (in Spanish). Santiago, Chile: Imprenta Cervantes. pp. 122.
  • Vivar, Jeronimo de (1987). Cronica y relacion copiosa y verdadera de los reinos de Chile (1558) (in Spanish). Madrid, Spain: ARTEHISTORIA REVISTA DIGITAL. Archived from the original on 2008-05-26.
  • Whelan, James (1989). Out of the Ashes: The Life, Death and Transfiguration of Democracy in Chile. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway.
  • World Wide Web Virtual Library History Central Catalogue. "WWW-VL: History: Chile" (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 29 February 2008. Retrieved 16 January 2009.